The Flying Morons - another plane delayed by a fucking idiot

“World wide derision”? HAHAHAHA. You’re a hoot.

You can’t even get the analogy right, hacky sack. She’s the idiot that reported somebody for doing math-it was the professor, the rest of the passengers, the crew and the airport that got “burned” for two hours, wasting ghod knows how much money and making people miss connections all over the fucking place.

Aren’t you the idiot that thinks she didn’t give her side of the story to the press because we talked about it here on this little board days later, hacky sack?

Why are you so interested in a 9 year old, die perversen?

No. I’m the person suggesting that there is another side to this story that hasn’t been made public yet. You’re the wanna-be internet bully who condemns a woman for daring to report suspicious activity to the aircrew. How dare she!

I see you’re still jumping to conclusions based on your misogynistic behavior.

Soooo, you think it was suspicious, too? Were the numbers too big and scary, or maybe it was fact that he used a sharp pencil instead of a crayon? What was suspicious about a man doing math, hacky sack?

You call being hauled into a room and interrogated by federal agents for 2 hours an inconvenience? I’d be wondering if I was going to be taken away somewhere without even a trial.

I’ll bet if it ever happened to you you’d consider it a lot more than an inconvenience.

Still going with that, are you? I don’t care what sex she is, and I’ve already said that I think you’re even dimmer than she is because at least she knew when to stop digging, and I don’t even know what sex you are.

USATODAY
Professor suspected of being a terrorist because of a math equation
U.S.

The Sun
Professor questioned by airline staff for doing MATHS on a flight
U.K.

Chinatopix
Economics Professor Labeled Terrorist for Writing Math Equations Aboard Airplane
China

And clocks are used in bomb timers, and algebra is use to calculate time, ergo . . . better call in Doorhinge.

Since she saw algebra, which is not suspicious, she should not have said anything, just as you should not be reported because you are using a Latin alphabet.

Le Monde
Le « terroriste » dans l’avion était un économiste avec une équation différentielle
France

Repubblica.
Guido Menzio: “La mia equazione su quell’aereo accusata di Jihad… Una barzelletta”
Italy

The Daily Mail
Italian Ivy League economist pulled off flight and interrogated for ‘mysterious’ scribblings flagged up by another passenger… which turned out to be MATH
U.K.

RT DEUTSCH
Weil er Differentialgleichungen berechnete: Mathematikprofessor löst Terroralarm in den USA aus
Germany

A woman saw/heard something that she thought was suspicious. It was her choice, not yours, to say something. You chose to attack a woman for speaking out as Obama’s DHS suggested that she should. “Bad woman, bad, bad woman”, howled the wanna-be internet bullies.

(post shortened, underline added)

Gotcha. :wink: Women should not decide for themselves if they think they’re seeing something suspicious. Life in the meadow must be so peaceful.

Trolling, OTOH…

Jesus.

I invoked Occam’s Razor earlier on, to suggest that the most likely explanation here is that the woman’s report was completely unwarranted.

But i focused on the wrong issue.

What i should have realized was the fact that, in any given discussion, the argument made by doorhinge is the one most likely to be completely without reason or logic. I think that’s the safest assumption in just about any thread where the question is more complex than “Vanilla or chocolate”?

Why do you keep stating “Obama’s DHS”? Is that a different DHS than the one I know?

It’s more like “Dance, monkeys, dance”, typed the internet troll.

(post shortened)

The wanna-be internet bullies have decided that they do not need to hear the woman’s version of this incident before deciding that she’s a moron. Why not wait for the whole story? Apparently there are some who do not want to let facts get it the way of an old fashion tar and feathering?

I prefer to wait to hear the whole story before condemning any of the parties involved in this incident. You may prefer to heat the tar and pluck the chickens before all of the facts are known.

She’s the one who declined to tell her side. And you’re condemning him without the full story.