Ehh, I think the jury is still out on that one, which is one reason why natural cork won’t be going away anytime soon.
There is extensive testing and developing being done in the wine industry, but so far, nothing has shown screw caps can preserve a red wine beyond say 10 or 15 years. For the average wine drinker, that’s not really a concern anyway, since most wine is meant to be drunk ‘young’ or within a few years of production/release. For people that cellar/collect those rare wines with real long term potential, natural cork is still the main stopper they’ll find. You can’t argue the fact that it’s worked for hundreds of years.
Still, 10-15 years is a pretty decent stretch, and you’re greatly reducing the chance of TCA. Like I said, there are a few wineries out here putting some high quality, cellar-worthy wines in screw caps. Many winemakers prefer them, but wineries are reluctant to make the switch because there is still that ‘cheap wine’ stigma attached to them by some consumers, and the ‘ritual’ of wine that many consumers aren’t willing to let go of. Some larger wineries (like Bonny Doon) are taking the ‘trailblazer approach’ and hoping the technology catches on with general consumers. Some smaller, high-end wineries are making the switch and not really making much fuss about it, assuming that their loyal, wine-educated consumers are already well aware of the advantages of the packaging and will still buy their libations.
With the screw cap (Stelvin, actually, there are other kinds/brands/etc.) it’s really the liner underneath the cap that the winemaker chooses and the pressure when the cap is applied that determines how much gas permeability the package has. Great improvements have been made in the last couple of years that allow vintners to apply a screw cap in a way that would closely resemble the extraordinarily minute permeability levels of natural cork. But the debate on whether that is even necessary is still going strong. Many believe there is enough oxygen in the wine and bottle to allow sufficient aging, and that much of a wine’s development is anaerobic anyway.
Synthetics are not doing well in studies for aging, again, which is why you’ll generally find them in whites and ‘drink now’ reds. They don’t seem to be as popular with oenophiles or winemakers. They are hard to pull out, some are impossible to get back in, and unlike the screw cap, they still require a tool for opening the bottle.
If you are really interested there are a few studies available online, as well of plenty of articles and debates on various wine websites.
Hogue Cellars Studies (pdf - certainly not the only winery to conduct a study, but as of right now the only one to release their findings to the public.)
Australian Closure Fund paper (pdf - kinda techie, here’s a nice summary)
Stelvin (Right now the big player in screw cap technology and advances.)
May 2004 article on AZ Central
(Sorry for the hijack.) :smack: