Miss Scott’s wardrobe makes little sense. The fashion of never wearing the same ensemble twice was a privilege of the .01%, but since I started noticing in episode 2, Miss Scott has worn at least 4 completely unique outfits. (Imagine the trunks from Pennsylvania!) And these are the superstructured styles of the day which required at least one servant to help dress the wearer.
I think iirc that she didn’t have a lot of clothes and Baranski told her to get more on her dime, lots of “bright colors” and not to continue to wear her mourning outfits.
But I have no knowledge as to the rest of your points and presume you’re correct in your analysis.
I love the show. I love a fancy dress, period soap opera. I got really annoyed and frustrated with DA as it wound down, to the point I never even saw the movie. I hope HBO can rein in some of JF’s … lesser choices… better than PBS could. (Or whatever the producing network was). I didn’t even know it was JF when I started watching it. I was in it for Baranski and Coons and pretty dresses in a setting we don’t often see.
If I had to nitpick, I don’t like that it’s doing too many of the same tropes as DA. The maid and the Master of the house, the shy kitchen maid. But at least they’re not doing it exactly the same, even if these tropes were also done in Gosford Park in yet a third way.