This is really irrelevant. Qin Shi Huangdi, you asked for a cite on the Dominionist issue and you got one. The whole topic may be irrelevant, but if you don’t care about it in the first place, it doesn’t make sense to continue on the tangent AND drag Obama into it.
Ooh, months! A little slow for the people in the bonfires.
Yup, debated until, … um was it 1926?
Ok, I’m going to ask YOU for a cite about what Ayers sees as uptopia. Not what someone else claims he says, but what HE says.
Oops, read this too late, and I have to say I agree. Forget it, Qin, we a re hijacking a thread.
Considering the personal problems I’ve had with evangelicals, combined with how annoying they became when encouraged by W, I would not have voted for Huckabee unless he were running against Satan Himself.
Now that he is no longer threatening to hijack our political system, well, he is kinda cute isn’t he?
You’re a baptist preacher (former or current), you shouldn’t be allowed to run, vote or raise a family. You have the right to keep your delusion, you DON’T have the right to force it on other people, even “at gunpoint”, and you’re not allowed to futz up the education system either. Just let people who can think for themselves take care o’ that, preacher.
I’ve never been more happy to hear he’s not running THIS time, but just wait for 2016.
By 2016, he’ll make Chris Christie look like Kate Moss.
Religious people shouldn’t run for office. Gotcha. Too bad. I liked Obama.
I’m sure that Locrian is trying to whoosh somebody, but I’m not sure whom. I mean, surely he doesn’t think that religious people (or maybe just Baptists) shouldn’t be allowed to raise a family.
That was intended to big big whoosh wasn’t it? I sure hope so.
Also, folks; program one of your function keys to type “Qin Shi Huangdi is on record as not caring about evidence” with a link to that post. I’ll save time by enabling you to focus on people who are actually interested in ideas.
Really? You’re hanging you hat on the notion that we should pay attention to people who take “months” to arrive at the conclusion that any rational person reaches immediately, and find it necessary to continue “debating” a point that is settled in modern enlightened civilization.
Good luck with that…
He wanted to run but his friends Jesus and Ted Nugent said not to, so whatcha gonna do?
Sorry, dude; in these parts the goalposts are shot with tranq darts and shackled before the debate begins. They ain’t going nowhere.
When Ayers was involved in his last bombing, Obama was living in Indonesia and was going to school. He was 9 years old.
When Obama was a political organizer in Chicago many many years later, Ayers was a rehabilitated expert on education. He was instrumental is setting up the classes and schools for poor. He was a respected author and organizer. That is a terrorist in QINland?
Little Mr. Stalin aren’t you? You’re a bigot pure and simple.
He hasn’t apologized or expressed any regret for his terrorism, indeed he continues to insist on the righteousness of his cause. He is rather comparable to Kurt Waldheim.
The subject of this thread is Mr. Huckabee. Has Mr. Huckabee apologized or expressed any regret?
He hasn’t done anything to apologize for. He has not murdered anyone, committed terrorism, say offensive remarks, indeed he is along with Ron Paul one of the most blameless politicians.
I’m referring to the advocacy of terrorism* mentioned earlier in the thread. Please try to keep up with the class.
*definition: violence directed against noncombatants for political purposes
Huckabee hasn’t personally advocated the death penalty for homosexuals or idolaters or whatnot.
Save the personal commentary for the Pit. It’s not appropriate for this forum.