This was posted in the other thread:
I figured this would be well mentioned in this thread started by Covfefe, who probably won’t be coming back here either.
For the record, I am not at all a fan of that other Pit thread.
I’m not copying here iiandyiiii’s empty moral grandstanding or lazy abdication of intellectual responsibility, where he’s “not sure” about some of the posts. Sheer laziness and stupidity. Many of the posts are completely awful. They are self-evidently awful. You have to be willfully obtuse to pretend to ignore that, and it’s another layer of inanity to cover that obtuseness in a veneer of moral righteousness. It is pathetically shallow behavior.
But I still don’t like that Pit thread at all.
I don’t like the animus in that thread not because Huey doesn’t deserve the more intelligent criticisms he’s receiving (it’s indisputable that he does) but because the very fact that he deserves the better criticisms opens up some sinister racial undertones to the lower-quality criticisms that I do not like at all. The attitude I’m picking up, whether fair or not, is: “HERE’s a black guy who FINALLY deserves what’s coming to him! It’s OPEN SEASON on this one!” And so all of the rhetorical guns come out. It feels like all the previous times when people had to bite back their tongue when they didn’t want to be challenged by a black guy built up a lot of pressure, and now that there’s a “deserving” target, that entire reservoir of animus can come out at once. I do not like it. Fair or not, that’s the attitude I think I’m picking up, and I do not like it.
Now, it’s a legitimate response to say, “Anybody who posted such appallingly malicious shit deserves to be pitted, and in fact would be pitted on this board.” I don’t disagree. The pitting is well deserved, and if it were anyone else being such a gigantic jerk, exactly the same thing would’ve happened. That’s not my criticism. My point is simply that there is a horrific racial history in this society, and that history changes the context of interpretation for every possible conversation. Including a Pit thread. The extended length of that thread, and its repeated beating of a dead horse, leaves itself open to more interpretations than the similar tedious length and bruised horse corpse habits of other similar threads, which would not suffer the deeper questions about motives. We interpret things in context. That’s just a fact. Fair? No. But who cares? The racial history of this country wasn’t very fuckin fair either, was it?
“But my motives are pure!” Fine. Sure. I’m not going to argue with you. There are plenty of posters who are making nuanced, intelligent criticisms, including especially Riemann (whose posts are pretty much always nuanced and intelligent). I’m not trying to read minds here, and say that the specific motives of specific posters are impure. I’m saying that it feels like, to me, that the social context of this thread matters. “We always beat dead horses like this!” Yes. True. But beating a dead horse so long in this context looks much worse than in other contexts. It raises darker questions in this context that it wouldn’t in other contexts.
I think it was absolutely, totally worth starting that Pit thread to highlight the worst behavior, so that people who didn’t know what a useless jerk Huey was could finally see that. But also I think the best thing to do now is to let it go. Just let it go. This particular dead horse doesn’t need the usual beating that most similar horses receive. Even if it quite thoroughly “deserves” it. Especially if it deserves it. The case has been made. It is not in dispute. (Or at least, it’s not in dispute to anyone who hasn’t deliberately shut their brain off.)
The pitting was fully justified. But continuing it? I really don’t think so.