I don’t understand the purpose of this link. It is a link to the thread we are in now.
The post is his cite.
Speaking as a woman, you’re generalization is false.
Resounding no, if he doesn’t have time to meet a woman through the means of a mainstream, Western social life he doesn’t the have time to maintain a mainstream, Western romantic relationship,
Go to a church, it’s an hour a week on a weekend morning, there’s always socializing after and everyone comes up and introduces themselves. If he doesn’t have time to fit that in, then he doesn’t have time for a relationship.
Who cares, and what does it mitigate, that he’s shit at creating work life balance?
It has less than nothing to do with the issue, and offensive to all women that you believe this somehow mitigates his ‘fishing off the company peer’, in clear violation of company policy.
He knew the policy, he ignored it, and lost his job. It’s NOT complicated.
I have no sympathy for someone who is so busy they can’t meet someone outside of work for a relationship. It will take the same amount of time to join these clubs or whatever as it would to actually have a relationship, if not less. Relationships are time-consuming, and if you don’t have the time to find someone, you don’t have the time to date someone.
There is no victim in the OP.
If no one is victimized, who do these policies actually exist?
To prevent conflicts of interest
If this premise is true, and not just a poor excuse dreamed up by someone unable to accept they’ve lost the argument, then busy male executives do not have time for relationships.
Unless of course you are arguing that these company policies are unfairly preventing relationships where a busy executive gets to come home at 10, have sex with their fiancee/employee, sleep five hourse and go back to work, and the fiancee/employee gets to have a very nice apartment to keep clean for the executive.
If there were victims it would be coworkers. In this specific case I have seen no evidence of any victims.
Its a post in a Pit thread that links to this thread. The purpose is to imply that the OP in this thread matches to the topic of the pit thread, and so direct other in this thread to a place where they might be able to more fully express their feelings regarding the OP.
The problem doesn’t have to be an amount of time. It could be a time window is bad. The Rotary Club meets from 6 to 7 on Wednesday night. He has to work then. Maybe he could do 6 to 7 on a Friday. There goes the rotary club.
Jim Peebles, maybe you’re just playing Devil’s Advocate here and I appreciate the perspective, but you’re making me think of Dutch, the detective from The Shield who fucks or attempts to fuck every woman at the police station including the widows of murder victims and the mother of a teenage serial killer, on the rationale that he doesn’t have time for a social life.
What’s a mainstream Western social life? Are all other styles bad?
That’s fiction. You aren’t just worried about real bad apples, but fictional bad apples too.
Aw baby, why you gotta be so infantilized? Come on, give me a smile. I know you got one for me.
Dude. I’m not really “worried” about anything, I’m just suggesting that high-powered businessmen do in fact have more free time than you seem to think.
Pity the poor executive who isn’t smart enough to figure out what clubs meet between 6 & 7 on a Friday night.