The Liberation of Iraqi Women: How's That Working Out?

Not so well, apparently.

GWB, 3/12/04:

Fast-forward to the present.

Iraqi women are being forced out of their jobs by religious terrorists:

And all too many women who leave the country have to go into the sex trade to support themselves or their families:

So both in Iraq and in exile, the liberation of Iraqi women proceeds apace, just as Bush said.

Ah well, at least Saddam’s “rape rooms” are gone, so it’s all good, right?

What should we do about it? Are Iraqi women going to be more liberated when we leave?

Well, we could stop saber-rattling at Syria (I’ve never understood quite why we were doing that in the first place) long enough to provide assistance to Iraqi refugees in that country.

Can’t do much for the women still inside Iraq that I can see. Some things are so fucked up, they’ve long since ceased to be unfuckupable.

Saber rattling at Syria is causing distress to Iraqi women?

They were a lot better off before we came. This should be another class of Iraqis we give asylum to. It might be a good time to start a program, so there won’t be quite so many trying to jump into helicopters in the Green Zone when we finally leave. But I suppose resettling refugees here would be an admission that the Administration screwed up.

We should be taking in way more than a token couple hundred of Iraqis per year. I hear there’s a lot of room out in Montana.

A legitimate suggestion. I find it a lot more helpful than “haha, look how the Bushies screwed up”.

The real question is would Iraqi women WANT asylum in America on any major scale? I can definitely see educated, professional women wanting to get the hell out, but my guess is that situation isn’t even a tiny fraction of the women being oppressed in Iraq.

That’s unclear, even if some are worse off. I haven’t seen poll data broken down by gender, but when asked, more Iraqis say life is better overall than say it’s worse (2007 compared to 2003) Link (warning: PDF)

Much/somewhat better: 43%
Same: 22%
Much/somewhat worse: 36%

I agree that we have done a piss poor job in allowing displaced Iraqis to come to the US. We should be doing a lot more. Do the Democrats have this on their radar screen? I haven’t heard anyone in either party talk about doing something.

I’d not be at all surprised if relatively more religious members of the Shia population would feel they were better off. I doubt very much that the educated female population would.

It looks like it is become column fodder. I’d guess someone is commissioning a poll even as we speak. :slight_smile:

You’re kidding, right??

But let me retranslate the following for you:

Saber-rattling at Syria makes it diplomatically difficult for us to help Iraqi women who have escaped to Syria.

I think that’s pretty far fetched. Are you suggesting that if we stopped “saber-rattling” at Syria, that we could somehow influence how Syrian criminals are treating Iraqi women? The only way we could realistically help them would be to let them come here, which we generally aren’t doing no matter where they were. If we were willing to take them in, I suspect the Syrians would be happy to let us have them, saber rattling or no saber rattling.

It says they polled 2000 people. I’d love to know what percentage of those people were women. In America, probably about 50% would be women, but in post-invasion Iraq the women tend to stay home and be wary of talking to foreigners and strangers.

Not Syrian criminals, no. But I think one could make a case that if we had better diplomatic relations with Syria, we could influence how the Syrian government is treating Iraqi women. As RTF’s third linked article notes:

If we want to help Iraqi women in Syria (short of helping them by making their own country a safe and livable place to return to, which we don’t seem able to do so far), I think the only way to do it is through agreements with the Syrian government.

Don’t get me wrong-- I’m all for toning things down and improving relations with Syria. But we have excellent relations with Saudi Arabia, and I don’t see that helping out women in that country.

OK, let me say it A THIRD TIME:

You mean if we gave them money there so that they didn’t have to prostitute themselves just to survive, they’d still be forced to prostitute themselves? Maybe I’m missing something here.

It’s really simple:

  1. Chances are the Syrian government doesn’t really give a flip one way or the other about the welfare of Iraqi refugees in Syria.

  2. However, to the extent that a million or so refugees puts a burden on their society, they do give a flip about that. So

  3. If we were willing to stop threatening them long enough to help them deal with the refugee problem we’ve foisted on them, they’d probably let us help the refugees. Refugees with money to spend is less of a drag on the economy than refugees who don’t have money to spend. The Syrian government would probably like some of the aid to flow through them so they could skim some off the top, but what the hey.

Well, we wouldn’t give them money in any case, but there isn’t anything stopping us from giving them aid, even with the saber rattling. Hell, we offered Iran aid when they had an earthquake in 2006 (they turned us down, IIRC).

And there is no way in hell we’d let money or aid be channeled thru the Syrian government. I hope you’re not implying that we should.

If you think people are going to automatically assume that assistance = money, you’re mistaken. Note that **Kimstu **didn’t interpret your post that way either.

While Iraq had a lot of problems before ,women were far better off. Over half the college students were women and over half the civil service workers were women. They did not have to dress according to any religious code .
I have been reading blogs by Iraqis for a couple years. I get the info from the.
http://afamilyinbaghdad.blogspot.com/
This blog started during the invasion and will describe what has gone on in the country for the last 4 years.

NPR aired an interview today with Yanar Mohammed on the state of women in Iraq In Iraq, Activist Struggles as Women's Rights Shrink : NPR .

I found it sad.

Islam as a theocracy is just horrible toward women. Our invasion of Iraq has resulted in driving their power structure toward Islamic fundamentalists and among the many tragedies of that wretched way of thinking is the utter decimation of women’s rights along with their humanity…it’s enough to make even an old geezer like me turn into a feminazi. There is no hope for those people. They are totally screwed no matter what any external power does at this point, and the women are the worst off.

Saying any more would probably get me cast into the pit.

We could move the state of Israel there and be done with a whole lot of strife in the area, but we’re also talking about individuals with (supposedly) inalienable rights.

Say, isn’t that the same argument for not rebuilding/resettling New Orleans? It’s in an unsafe area, so it shouldn’t be rebuilt/should be moved?

What inalienable rights? Do you doubt that the Iraqis who have helped us wouldn’t love to come here, given the chance? I suspect a purely voluntary program would have plenty of takers.