I’m not saying I have a better idea, but the problem is: trying to present facts to people who act as though facts are no better than opinions; you point out that Trump has made a bungled mess of XYZ; they show you a tweet where Trump claims that not only was his handling of XYZ the best that anyone ever did, but that everyone else saw how he handled XYZ and agreed he was the best they ever saw.
Moreover, any reliable source which might be presented as a rebuttal to Trump’s claims are immediately suspect. They would be called out as fake news, deep state actors, and/or political hack jobs. Nothing, and I mean literally nothing that can be presented to a dyed-in-the-wool Trump supporter will convince them; their minds will not be swayed.
If nothing else, every Trump admin official should be identified with the kicker “former Trump administration official” in every mention by the media or in social media for the next two decades. Never forget. Never let them even hope that we’ll forget.
“Mr Bannon — yes, Steve Bannon — expressed doubt about your intial claim, but nevertheless you persisted…”
“You will never again be America’s Mayor, but there still may be time to save some of the cash you pawned your credibility for, should Dominion Voting Systems ultimately leave you with any.”
I dunno, I think the clarity and forthrightness with which the Lincoln Project condemned his behavior is, if not heroic, at least admirable. In recent years the Republicans have been weak-willed about criticizing their own even in the face of clear evidence of wrong-doing. (For some reason I find Susan Collins especially loathsome in the regard, but she’s only one of dozens of examples.) Look at how listless the GOP has been about denouncing Marjorie Taylor Greene, for example.
It truly is remarkable. In addition to the allegations against Weaver – and that senior LP officials were aware of the allegations well before the broke in the press – the organization apparently directed more than half of the funds they raised to consulting firms owned by LP officials.
Political consultants truly are a unique class of charlatans. The entire industry is designed to hoover up as much money as possible from politicians and their donors with no standards of ethics or accountability.
And, so? Did those consulting firms do the jobs they were paid to do? If I needed a good job, I’d hire someone I knew well and trusted.
Look, the ads were produced. They went out over the airways. They hurt trump.
It sez right there in the article: Lincoln Project had been spending on ads against GOP senators, including in critical races in South Carolina and Maine.
Is there any indication that the LP officials were getting rich over this?