I have always liked Ecclesiastes. Solomon (one can only assume he’s the author) was asking many of the same questions. It’s light, but GOOD reading, and can easily be polished off in an evening.
I particularly liked the “rain falls on the righteous and the unrighteous” and such. Some see it as depressing. I always saw it as honest, yearning, and ending in a positive and balanced message.
And beyond that, those who falter - even a little - can end up feeling judged for being “morally” weak.
A balanced look at why-bad-things-happen-to-good-people can be hard to find in some places.
If it helps… there is no prohibition against working as hard as you can to ensure the greatest amount of health - including surgery, meds, etc… assuming you aren’t Seventh Day or Jehovah’s Witness.
FWIW, the New English Bible uses ‘tested’ where the linked translation uses ‘tempted.’ Maybe the original Greek has overtones of both, but that’s strictly a WAG.
I don’t know of anybody who says you’re supposed to be excited to die. Look, if I were moving to someplace completely different, even if it were someplace way better than where I’m leaving now, I’d still be sad about everything and everyone I was leaving behind.
Well, if you see someone struggling or suffering, there’s several ways you can respond:
You can go out of your way to try to help them, to do whatever you can to lighten their burden. But that might be difficult; it might cost you something.
You can empathize with them and share their pain. But then you’d feel bad.
Or you can say to them, “The Lord only gives you as much as you can handle.” That way you don’t have to do anything to help them, because it’s nothing they can’t handle on their own. You don’t have to feel bad for them, because, hey, they can handle it.
Looked at in one light, it seems to make some sort of coherent sense, especially as he follows it up with an observation that such people appear to manifest an unusual amount of anger towards an entity that supposedly does not exist.
Yes, I do. If I claim I don’t believe there are ghosts in my house, but I spend a good deal of my time complaining about them, it is different from not believing there are ghosts in my house.
Ah, then I see the problem. Your analogy must be modified so it’s not the fictional ghosts that anger you, but the people around you who talk about ghosts, who want to teach ghost facts in schools and who want laws passed based on common beliefs about ghosts. This would be a more accurate reflection of atheists and atheism. While they’d be happy to never have to talk about ghosts again, the ghost-boosters are prevalent and aggressive and eternally keeping an eye on them is the cost of liberty.
Anyway, it’s unclear that God, assuming he exists, ever said anything along the lines of “I only give you what you can handle.” Certainly some people like to say God said this but surely this has to be viewed with the same suspicion as any hearsay evidence - even more so since the original speaker is not known to exist.
As with “God works in mysterious ways”, I see it as an attempt to reconcile claims of an all-powerful, all-loving diety with a world where a lot of painful and nasty crap does and always has existed. For Biblical justification, I’d suggest the OP is pretty much bang-on when invoking the Book of Job. Verse 40:14 seems relevant.
I understand that. But if they’re in my house and they bother me, I can kick them out. What’s the point in arguing with them? And if they’re gathered somewhere yacking, what a dumbass I would be to saunter up to them and open my mouth. If you want to be free to pursue your own happiness in your own way, then stop supporting either left-leaning or right-leaning authoritarianism.
ETA:
Incidentally, there are plenty of people who fit the analogy I gave, though I also understand yours.
Once when I was going through a rough patch a neopagan-witch assured me, “The Goddess never gives you more than you can handle.” Not based on any scripture (there is none in Wicca), but it was still good to hear.
The more Christian response would be the first one. If someone is hungry, you feed them. If they’re cold, you clothe them. If they’re sick, you try to heal them. If they’re lonely, you befriend them. What you don’t do is give them empty platitudes that only sound good when you aren’t the one who is suffering.
That’s the lesson I take away from Job. In addition to blaming him for his problems (and giving him bad advice), Job’s friends were only interested in hearing themselves speak rather than helping him feel better. That’s why they were bad friends.
Another reason why I don’t think the bromide is very Christian is because it presumes that God is the one who gives us our problems. I thought he was supposed to be the problem-solver, not the problem-maker.
“Life’s rough, wear a helmet” makes as much sense as any of these other platitudes. It’s all bullshit designed to try to let us rationalize the terrible things that happen. I have no idea why shit happens, I have to assume there really is no point, it’s just random. I have seen way too many bad things happen to good people, and way too many bad people seemingly skating through life.
Which is why I’m having a faith struggle lately. The meek inherit the earth but I guess we’re supposed to get walked all over and crapped on in the mean time
I stopped struggling long ago. I have faith in myself and I can count on myself to be there when I need me! I know I’m real. I’m able to look at myself in the mirror everyday.