[QUOTE=Liberal]
For people who claim not to believe in God, He sure seems to piss a lot of you off. I’ve never understood this. I don’t believe in the Invisible Pink Unicorn, and so whatever the IPU might be alledged to have said would not disturb me in the least.
[/QUOTE]
To atheists, we don’t hear religious claims as coming from a higher source, we hear them as personal beliefs camouflaged of a supernatural power.
Do I hate the website “http://www.godhatesfags.com”? Well, no. A website never hurt anyone, it’s ultimately nothing more than electricity, copper wire, and scratches on a magnetic disk. I am, however, greatly offended by statements that I read from that website, because those statements reflect beliefs that come from very real people.
Here’s an idea: “Paperclips were invented by gays to further the jew liberal cause.” Like the website, the paperclip idea isn’t anything real or authentic, physical, it’s floating free between us. It’s just an idea–are you in the slightest bit offended by it? Of course not, because no one believes it.
To be brief (and catchy!), a belief is an idea in action. When you hear someone say “I believe paperclips(…)”, it doesn’t matter that godsaidit or they read it in the clouds, the end result is still that a person’s behavior will be guided by that hateful belief.
You would be equally as frustrated with an “I read it in the clouds” response as an atheist would be with “godsaidit”, because neither of you accept the justification for discriminating against gays and jews as sufficient.
Personally, I find the statement “god never gives you more than you can handle” offensive for a number of reasons. Most importantly, it makes a claim that is demonstrably false. People die every few minutes from circumstances far beyond their control. I don’t see “never getting more than you can handle” being construed to be anything less than an out and out lie to placate someone going through rough times. That the person telling me that thinks I will believe it in the face of overwhelming conflicting evidence strikes me a condescending attack on my intelligence.