Considering that about 90% of Haitians are Catholic, they were already inducted into that one.
Regardless of their guilt this trial has the capacity to tighten charitable purse strings. It would be better for Haitians if the court declared it a mis-communication and threw the group off the island with a warning of what will occur if it happens again. They don’t have the resources to feed themselves let alone a bunch of foreigners. Imagine a group people capable of generating great amounts of negative publicity at a time when the country is desperately seeking aid.
Well, with this non-profit adoption agency, it still over $20,000 to adopt, so there is obviously a market.
http://www.dillonadopt.com/Haiti-A.htm#Adoption_Costs
Ugh. Throwing criminal cases out because you’re afraid that “generous” westerners won’t keep giving you aid? That’s like the worst possible outcome.
But the most probable.
Can you imagine if this happened in the US? If a bunch of Mexican missionaries grabbed a busload of kids post-Katrina and tried to take them back to Tiajuana I don’t think they’d get a very sympathetic response.
I agree that it would be an odious thing to do but in reality the country of Haiti doesn’t exist anymore. It’s gone. they’re lucky it didn’t happen earlier in history because there would have been zero help from the outside world and they would be eating the dead.
Most of the earthquake damage was in Port-au-Prince. One city. Granted, the largest city in the country and the capital, but one city. Haiti is no more “gone” than it was before the earthquake. Government services and functions outside of the capital are unaffected. It’s not like it’s Somalia.
Thanks for pointing this out. Nefarious intent is open to interpretation, and the actions of this group are really hard t justify unless you work from the assumption that one culture or religion has moral authority over another. How about Canadians stealing babies born without health care? The French taking obese kids and bringing them abroad for a chance at a healthier diet?
There have been several stories of people going to Haiti with no real assets or skills, because they felt they had to do more than donate. It just seems so short-sighted and selfish, especially when most if not all of them become drains on resources intended for actual victims. We can’t reward people too stupid to realize someone else may be better suited for a task.
From an economic perspective, the country is gone. They didn’t have much of an infrastructure to begin with and the area most developed is totally destroyed. they only have 1 real airport and even that isn’t saying much considering it’s a single runway with no taxiways. The country didn’t qualify as a 3rd world nation prior to the earthquake. The financial deficits would have to outstrip any tax revenue being generated at this point.
Of course not, that’s why Silby had to go to Haiti.
Don’t know about the NPR coverage, but there definitely have been other instances of overzealous missionary adopters in the news:
From the Onion:
I just thought that was funny, and very appropriate.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/02/11/world/main6197761.shtml
The Haitian judge says he will recommend that they go free.
There is a significant market for young children from developing countries, irrespective of those children’s colour. The number of healthy/non-disabled white kids available for adoption has plummeted to such a degree that parents looking to adopt are either forced to consider taking on an older or more “problematic” child, or to look to the developing world. The large majority choose the latter.
Unfortunately the consequence of this is that there an awful lot of really, really dodgy adoptions going on. The Haitian one is only the best known at the moment, but it’s happening all over the world. See for example a recent UNICEF report about the Vietnamese adoption industry, which found it to be very clearly demand-driven rather than supply-driven. In other words, the more foreign (read Western) parents looking to adopt children from Vietnam, the more “adoptable” children magically appear. It doesn’t take a genius to work out that something’s not right there. Ethiopia is another good example.
Getting back to Haiti, I’m sorry that the judge is letting these criminals go. They are “real traffickers”, even if they aren’t intending to force the children into slave labour or prostitution, and an international example should be made out of them.
Even if we presume the best of intentions of these people, this really does show that rescue, recovery and aid is best left to those who know what they are doing.
Send money and people with skill, not amateurs.
And there should be enough government people left in the affected area to control who comes into the country. If you show up with nothing but a smile then you go back.
Oops, not so fast!
Looks like there might be a little delay in their release.
Oy.
And the question about how Silbey might try to make money off this venture has now been answered.
A Righteous Christian Woman like Laura Silbey dosen’t have to justify her actions to anyone but the Lord!!!
(except maybe the Haitian Criminal Justice system, the U.S. State Department, and the Idaho Attorney General)
Except at this point it’s just the suggestion that someone resembles another person on the planet.