Ask and ye shall receive. And in under three hours.
Please quote the part where Kaus says that. Because I sure don’t see it.
That’s right, PROVE I didn’t secretly hire a nameless illegal nanny off the books leaving no paper record. Just go on and PROVE it!
Guilani runs hot and cold with me. He brought on some really good people (Bratton) and did some really good things as far as cleaning and reforming up NYC, but he also brought in unprecedentedly incompetant nepohires (even after campaigning against this practice). It looks like Kerik was one of the latter in the end: someone who got carried along way past his station by slavish devotion to Guilani’s apron strings.
All this and we still don’t know the reasons behind his aborted run in Iraq or his potentially transformation of the manpower and public resources of the Department of Corrections into a RNC campaign office.
Lighten up, F.U.
The Swiftvets were able to produce a copy of a signed arrest warrant supporting their charges?
They ought to have mentioned that in their ads, methinks.
If the party is going to endorse conservative moral standards as an element of public policy, they most certainly should be held to them. That includes celibacy for the unmarried.
The nanny should have a name, which should be verifiable by other sources. Check SS records or other public records. I don’t think it should be that hard.
But then he’d be confirmed! Is that what you want? Do you want Robespierre for National Security Czar? I like my national politics with a good dose of buffoonery, thank you very much!
It’s pretty hard if we just never find out things like her name, her… wait: Social Security? Isn’t the whole problem that she was an illegal alien and WASN’T going to get SS?
Yes. There would be no SS records for her. Or at least none from her employment by Kerik.
Look, just so everyone has the context, this is why an affair with Judith Regan is deliciously amusing to many (observation and quotes taken from Atrios):
CUE VIOLINS:
CUE CLIPS OF FOXNEWS BABBLING-HEAD FEEDS FROM THE POST-CLINTON ERA:
Yummy!
AND THE VIOLINS EXPLODE WITH CORNY PASSION!!!
Well, then I’ll get right on finding things that don’t exist! Shouldn’t take too long to track them down! Why, having a name or even a country of origin to go on would just GET IN MY WAY!
That’d be a novelty for the Republican Party.
Anyone else remember Dan “Clinton is a scumbag” Burton and his illegitimate son whom he pretended didn’t exist for fifteen years?
You know, I have to blame Clinton for this funny, funny situation. Seriously. Every new crazy detail that comes up about this guy just brings a wash of errie Lewinsky scandal nostalgia. If bedding now absurdly hypocritical morality scold Regan wasn’t enough, he apparently bedded her in an apartment overlooking the 9/11 pit that was donated to help weary rescue and repair workers.
And just in time to be relevant to the fact that homosexuals are destroying marriages comes word that Kerik is an experienced hand at marriage, with three under his belt and counting (though he, apparently, only counts two).
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ny-nywife144083539dec14,1,6738827.story?coll=chi-news-hed
None of this, in my mind really disqualifies him from the job he was slated for. But it IS pretty damn rich on so many levels. Given that there is a seeming unending pit of oddball revelations about this man, he certainly has a pretty major MOTIVE for making up a nanny-backout once he saw that all this could be headed down the pipe at him.
On the other hand, his already best-selling autobiography should see a pretty major bump, which would make him a rich man… if he wasn’t already incredibly wealthy that is.
On the other hand, using a sacred 9/11 space to carry on his extramartial trysts whislt his men were working their butts off in the pit below definately complicates his image as a big 9/11 figure.
You are forgetting that Sex might be just another diversion. Take Clinton, do you really think it was about Lewinsky charms?
Oh, this is rich. A Republican is caught up in a sex-and-corruption scandal and somehow it becomes Clinton’s fault.
What the heck are you talking about? Are you suggesting that Clinton’s sexual infidelity was not about sex at all? Perhaps it was part of a complicated scheme to betray the American people. Yeah, that’s it. :rolleyes: