Yeah, that must be why we can’t warm up to easy-going charms of Janet Reno.
Come to think of it, could Kerik beat Janet in Demolition Match?
Yeah, that must be why we can’t warm up to easy-going charms of Janet Reno.
Come to think of it, could Kerik beat Janet in Demolition Match?
In a shocking surprise announcement, the Bush camp declares that no one is to blame:
You’ve got to go with the lies you’ve got, not the lies you wish you had.
I agree wholeheartedly. Especially about “siisy jokes” by some cross-dressing types, whose reference to an “intellectual prowess” is but a lucid guise for a woman’s name.
Ummm, dude? This is GD. Direct personal insults are verboten. Might ask your local mod if this qualifies. (I’m not gonna argue about it; that’s their beat.)
Not implying anything, you understand. Just saying.
Sorry I missed that. I was busy on Amazon.com checking to see if Liza Minelli had any new CDs out for Christmas.
Fact is, my screen name = my real name. I’ve made that clear on a few occasions. I’ve got nothing to hide.
Ummm, dude? This is GD. Direct personal insults are verboten.
That is only true if you are bigot enough to consider ‘cross-dressing’ as insult.
I’ve got nothing to hide.
What about your Nanny?
That is only true if you are bigot enough to consider ‘cross-dressing’ as insult.
Please. It’s “differently attired”.
What about your Nanny?
Who’s your nanny? Say it… Who’s your nanny?
Where’s Larry Flynt on this? Why hasn’t he offered the Nanny $100,000 to step forward?
Maybe this nanny is the one and only woman in the US who doesn’t have nude pictures on file somewhere. Seems like whenever a woman gets her 15 minutes of fame these days, it turns out there are nude photos lying around in someone’s office.
Perhaps she will be tapped to offer commentary on “The Nanny” reruns on Nickelodian.
The possibilities are endless!
Please. It’s “differently attired”.
Thank you, yes, that’s what I meant. So don’t scratch my face.
That is only true if you are bigot enough to consider ‘cross-dressing’ as insult.
Like I said, ask a mod if you want a definitive opinion.
In a shocking surprise announcement, the Bush camp declares that no one is to blame:
Breaking News, World News, US and Local News - NY Daily News - New York Daily News
Gonzales must be exceptionally loyal.
Like I said, ask a mod if you want a definitive opinion.
Look, I wasn’t the first to hint about “effeminate” and sexually frustrated people in this thread. If you track back, you might find out who started that. But no matter. In the spirit of pagan holidays approaching, we all are dancing merrily around the fire, just far enough not to get singed, and you are marching in with a big placard, “Beware of Fire!” Why don’t you toss it into the flames and join the fun?
Look, I wasn’t the first to hint about “effeminate” and sexually frustrated people in this thread. If you track back, you might find out who started that…
Yep, it was our friend 'luci who started it, directed at me. Since it’s actually my real name, I could’ve taken it rather personally. I mean, I have no idea what the sexual proclivities of my great, great, great… great grandfather was back somewhere in the British Isles. There is an old family legend though, that the ancestral manse was quite well decorated!
Given all Kerik’s endless litany of shady deals and major problems, it’s probably worth noting that this isn’t the only job for which he should have been vetted. He was also put in charge of Iraqi police training: something that turned out to be a manifest failure (he left early, something that’s been unexplained). Shouldn’t he have been vetted before being put in charge of that rather important assignment?
It never ends:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/
Possibly helpful:
A few days of digging by news organizations have revealed that Bush had planned to entrust one of the most sensitive jobs in his Cabinet to a man who had failed to report lavish gifts he received as a New York City official, had declared personal bankruptcy and was the subject of an arrest warrant in a civil case involving unpaid condominium fees.
Since Kerik withdrew, reports have emerged that he helped a company suspected of doing business with organized crime, and he has been accused of extramarital affairs that his representatives do not deny.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64738-2004Dec14.html
No one in this town believed for more than 10 minutes that Berniegate was just another nannygate.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3339-2004Dec15.html
…five detectives from the Manhattan South Homicide Task Force went to the homes of various suspects, fingerprinted some of them, interrogated all of them and told a few that they would have to take lie detector tests. The horrific crime? The police commissioner’s friend was missing some items…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49827-2004Dec8.html
Can you imagine putting all the law enforcement resources of the entire federal government in this guy’s hands?
I agree wholeheartedly. Especially about “siisy jokes” by some cross-dressing types. . .
Who are we talking about here? I thought Giuliani did the cross-dressing (and is at the heart of the Kerik affair) and Arnie made the sissy jokes? Am I missing something?