The (on-again, off-again) Travis McGee movie

I am so out of touch with general industry news that I didn’t know that the long-simmering Travis McGee franchise had been greenlighted last year. It’s been a pet project of Leonardo DiCaprio, who had planned to star in a series of movies made from the John D. novels, but now has apparently stepped back into a producer’s role.

Which is too bad. My first thought was of Babyface Jack mangling the iconic role, but having seen him in some late movies, I started to see him as McGee without no trouble at all.

So “The Deep Blue Goodbye” is greenlighted and in preproduction, with… Christian Bale as McGee. I am way back to “meh” on this, remembering all too well the 1980 horror with that era’s can’t miss manly-man star, Sam Elliott. I just don’t see Bale bringing anything to the role but, well, Christian Bale. While DiCaprio and Bale are both too short (6 foot; McGee is famously 6’4"), at least Leo has blue eyes that could pass for McGee’s “spit colored” gray. Maybe they plan on contacts rather than letting the actor redefine the role.

Anyway, production is on indefinite hold because Bale just destroyed his ACL and can’t do anything like the physical moves needed for such a film. So all the pre and planning may go up in smoke like it has for most of the last decade’s efforts.

But there was a last-minute casting decision that made me sit up and think. The role of Meyer is a difficult one - very much second banana, very defined, very nuanced, very very easy to cast with a generic slightly-Jewish wise-ass old man. But the producers made a swing for the fences with a piece of casting that first seemed bizarre (and again, choosing someone in a white-hot phase, which often bombs):

Ha, ha, I’m going to popup-proof this - [Peter Dinklage].

At first, I said, O U Gotta B F’in Kiddin’ Me. But then it sank in… he’s the perfect actor for the role, and there’s nothing about the novel character of Meyer that wouldn’t dovetail perfectly with his, um, shortcomings.

If Leo would just step back into the main role, I could get excited about a decade of McGee films.

ETA: The problem, of course, is that Meyer doesn’t even exist for the first four novels, including DBG, and is a minor figure for two more. So they are going to be rewriting the story considerably, and I still haven’t heard whether they will stay in-period (early 1960s to start) or be updated (which would completely unravel many of the best stories). But they do have 21 novels to pick and choose among and combine and rebuild for maybe 5-6 movies total.

The difference in height and eye color is going to be completely overshadowed by the much more significant difference: the one between 1964 and 2015.

If they try to portray the character faithful to the original, he’ll be badly outdated. And if they try to modernize him, they’ll offend the fanbase.

I think the McGee series is a perfect followup to Mad Men, showing the character and events in period, and evolving over 10-15 years. It would be a huge mistake to either be slavishly faithful to the books or try to make the setting generically “now.” Detective novels of that era are among those that would be irrevocably short-circuited by cell phones, unless you pull ST:TOS-level technobabble nonsense.

I’m almost ready to give up on seeing my novel characters on the big screen.

Tom Cruise as Jack Reacher. Brutal.

Titus Welliver as Harry Bosch. Not one hell of a lot better.

I’m re-reading the series and I’m on book number five now (Bright Orange for the Shroud). Some of that early stuff is way misogynistic (or perhaps just way antiquated toward women) and hard to take. I don’t know how they upgrade much of that, or bring it to 2015.

Well… part of that is because writers make their characters stand out; if the guy’s 6’4", that makes him very tall by any standard, and probably one that makes it hard to find a competent, established actor to play.

I personally tend to accept actors who get the sort of character zeitgeist down, even if they’re not temporally in the right time, or don’t exactly physically look the part. For example, Paul Bettany is way too handsome, tall and pale to be Stephen Maturin, but he nails the part- he gets the fundamentals of the character, so I was happy with him even if he doesn’t look the part.

Why does it have to be an established actor? Why couldn’t this be a breakout role for an as-yet-unknown actor (the way, say, Superman was for Christopher Reeve, or Han Solo was for Harrison Ford)?

That’s taking method acting to a whole new level…

I thought Rod Taylor was adequate in the TV movie Darker Than Amber. the actor i would most like to have seen in the role (please don’t laugh much) was Fred Dryer, in terms of casting to type (circa his TV show Hunter). And it doesn’t seem to me McGee will really require much acting chops, as written J. D. M. I wonder how Adam Baldwin (Jayne of firefly fame) would look blond?

Sorry, I just found this reply. applause

Not sure why they’ve never tried casting Tom Selleck as Travis McGee.