Cecil doesn’t use that as an explanation – the word clearly predates that story – but he doesn’t say the story is untrue. (He just implies it.)
Snopes, on the other hand, explicitly says that those “to insure promptness” boxes just didn’t exist, and puts the word’s earliest use at around 1610.
Obviously, the word isn’t an acronym. But is the Johnson story or a variation thereof at least partly true? Etymologists have been busy since 1976 – hell, we know where “OK” and “The Big Apple” came from now – so what’s new in the origins of “tip”?
Also, what’s the origin of the acronym explanation for “tip”? Where does this bogus explanation come from?
(This is prompted by last night’s trivia quiz, where the quizmistress asked what “tip” originally stood for. Thankfully, even though we knew the story was untrue, we knew what she thought she was asking for.)
A mad desire to fill in all the empty spaces in etymology with spurious acronyms appears to have arisen during the 20th century, possibly as a result of the acronym-happy Second World War.
Acronymic Citations Rarely Or Never Yield Much Sense
Anyway, I have to hand a copy of Brewer’s Dictionary of Phrase and Fable, and here’s what is has to say on the matter:
“cant” is cross-referenced, the meaning being “The specialized vocabulary of a particular group of people, such as thieves, lawyers or journalists.”
So basically, it is related to the other meaning of “tip”, in the betting sense.
I know the acronym origin story is bogus. I wasn’t as clear on that as I should’ve been.
(The OED gives the 1610 date as the earliest citation for “tip” as “To give; to hand, pass; to let one have; to put on, present, or exhibit the character of: usually with dative of person.” 1706 is the earliest citation for “To give a gratuity to; to bestow a small present of money upon (an inferior), esp. upon a servant or employee of another, nominally in return for a service rendered or in order to obtain an extra service; also upon a child or schoolboy.” Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to access the OED site through the Seattle Public Library when I first posted this thread.)
I guess my real question is: who came up with the acronym origin? When does it date to? As John W. Kennedy says, lots of acronym origins sprang up after WWII, but there’s still got to be someone somewhere who came up with this particular story at a particular time, and I’m wondering when that is.
The “Word Detective” article goes astray on one point, though. “In-” and “en-” were pretty much interchangeable in the 18th century. Quibbling on “ensure” vs. “insure” in period is useless.
“Rare” is not “nonexistent”. Medieval Judaism was very fond of acronyms, and back-acronyms are far from unknown. (For example, the word “cabal”, actually derived from Hebrew via mediaeval Latin, was explained in the Restoration as Clifford, Arlington, Buckingham, Ashley, Lauderdale, five lords who pretty much controlled the government of Charles II for some time, and the myth that this was the actual origin of the word lasted at least into the 1950’s.
Everyone at the time who used ‘cabal’ to describe Clifford, Arlington, Buckingham, Ashley and Lauderdale knew that it was an older word - that’s what made the joke (vaguely) amusing - and, as several of the best-known memoirs of the time explain it, there was never a time thereafter when the correct explanation had been completely forgotten. Macaulay knew it was older, as did the compilers of the first edition of the OED.
Sure, the people who invented it knew better, and scholars knew better. But I actually remember being taught that “Clifford, Arlington, Buckingham, Ashley and Lauderdale” was the true orgin.
It doesn’t matter how stupid something is. Put it in print, and people will believe it.
This is a good point, and another of my questions. No doubt “tips” predate the “to insure prompt service” box story. But did those boxes exist, with T.I.P.S. written on them, explained by the acronym? Or are the boxes themselves as bogus as the explanation?
I’ve posted my 1895 “find” to the American Dialect Society Mailing List. Perhaps in the next few days we’ll have some info from some experts about the origin of acronyms in the 19th Century.
If you want an educated opinion, …NO, there were never any “tip” boxes.
The idea that there was even a discussion of acronyms at that point was of surprise to one of the list members who is one of the experts.
If I don’t report back in a few days, someone jog this thread.