As someone who has practiced Zen meditation on and off for the last 20 years, I find this article distressing. It suggests that real psychological harm can come from meditating for long periods (more than 30 minutes per day) and that meditation might trigger psychosis in some individuals. This flies in the face of a fairly large body of research demonstrating the psychological benefits of meditation.
A 2014 study from Carnegie Mellon University subjected two groups of participants to an interview with openly hostile evaluators. One group had been coached in meditation for three days beforehand and the other group had not. Participants who had meditated reported feeling less stress immediately after the interview, but their levels of cortisol—the fight-or-flight hormone—were significantly higher than those of the control group. They had become more sensitive, not less, to stressful stimuli, but believing and expecting that meditation reduced stress, they gave self-reports that contradicted the data.
Meditators also reported diminished emotions, both negative and positive. “I had two young children,” another meditator said. “I couldn’t feel anything about them. I went through all the routines, you know: the bedtime routine, getting them ready and kissing them and all of that stuff, but there was no emotional connection. It was like I was dead.”
In 2017, Britton and her team published their findings in PLOS One, a prominent scientific journal. The report presented a taxonomy of “meditation-related difficulties,” including anxiety and panic, traumatic flashbacks, visual and auditory hallucinations, loss of conceptual meaning structures, non-referential fear, affective flattening, involuntary movements, and distressing changes in feelings of self. Some of the study participants were new to meditation, but nearly half had at least ten thousand hours of practice. The majority of the sample—forty-three out of sixty meditators representing Theravada, Zen, and Tibetan traditions—had experienced moderate to severe impairment in their day-to-day functioning. Ten had required inpatient hospitalization.
What’s most unsettling is that I find meditation to be a pretty stressful experience. I have a number of mental health issues including anxiety and PTSD and that shit seems to always come up when I sit down to meditate. While I have found it helpful, I’ve often encountered a lot of resistance to sitting and doing it because of how distressing it can be.
Any Zen teacher would argue that this is how it should be. The idea that meditation is supposed to be relaxing is kind of a new one. You’re just supposed to sit with all of that and be uncomfortable and observe it. And that’s fine. On the whole, I feel like I do better when I meditate regularly (I rarely go over 25 minutes.)
But am I really doing better? And am I playing with fire? I’ve been a proponent of Zen because the evidence points to it being helpful for most people, because meditation causes neurogenesis and can improve baseline mood, and because it’s been integrated with many evidence based treatments (ACT, DBT) so I haven’t felt like I’m engaged in some kind of woo spiritual practice. This is the first time I’ve really seen contradictory evidence (and if anyone has more, please do share.)
This is a bit of a crisis of faith for me. It suggests that the goal of non-attachment - so central to the Buddhist philosophy - is maybe not a good thing.
Thoughts?