Now this is why I love you guys!
Other forums on the internet have reacted with words like “Wow, bet knowing that the true Queen of England is an American drives the Royal Family nuts!”, but (like me) you people are incurable sceptics, and say “What a load of crap!”. Still, I wondered if I was just being WAY too negative about this.
It’s just that her “proof” seems so ludicrous. Like the “Genealogy Chart”, which shows that James Kenneth, the son of Mrs Kelman was born on Ernest Simpson’s 55th birthday. I mean, what the hell does that prove? All of the highlighted coincidences in date and name add up to nothing at all. Also, in the photo section, note the obvious posing of the grandson in order to recreate the look of Prince Albert - how many young men had mutton chops in 1996?
Then there’s the matter of the dates on the charms and jewels. She’s claiming the charm with the 3 on it was to commemorate the three of them, Edward, Wallis and child. Yet the date she’s singled out of the three (March 12 1934) is nearly three months before the date she claims their child was born on. Why would it be significant? Then they claim that June 1-4 1934 on another charm is the dates Wallis spent in hospital after the birth. In the 50’s my grandmother was kept in hospital for around 10 days after giving birth. It seems unlikely that Wallis would have been released so quickly to me. Then there’s a charm that says “I doo too July” and it looks like the letters OK, but they say it’s a baby (turn your head to the side). Why would they have a baby charm inscribed with July if they thought their baby died in June?
As for the photographs, I believe they’ve mistaken resemblance in style, fashion and pose for resemblance in looks. There’s no similarities between the Royal family and the Kelman family that I can see, although perhaps YMMV. All I see is photographs showing people with similar hair styles and wearing similar clothes. All photos from 1996 on are obviously staged to look like the royal shots - that’s when Elizabeth Kelman recieved her divine revelation.
I had also found the notion that the US Government was dragged in to cover up the birth laughable. I’m afraid it seems that many Americans are unable to believe that other countries have their own intelligence and defence agencies. If this story was believable in every other detail, I would still find it hard to swallow the idea that King George had to get America to make his baby grandchild disappear for him. Something like this would have to be handled by closest and most loyal aides, involving as few others as possible. And why America? Wouldn’t King George be a little sick of all things American after his son and heir managed to knock up a married American woman who already had one divorce behind her?
Please, I’d love to hear more insights on this story. Are there any “facts” left unchallenged? Any more blatant lapses in logic that haven’t been exposed? Let’s defeat this woman totally, lest she spread her ignorance to others.