I agree-the “conspiracy” theory is just about the most non-rational thing ever concocted. You would have to assume that:
-the millions of people (who saw the second plane crashing into the second tower) were duped 9somehow)
-the explosives had to be planted and set off with NOBODY seeing ANYTHING suspicious
-the conspiracy involved hundreds 9if not thousands) of people who have kept absolutley silent
Frankly, Biblical literalism (i.e. the earth is 7000 years old) makes MUCH more sense. I’m amazed that people subcribe to this.
One is reminded of the method Holocaust deniers use. They are not really trying to prove anything, and are not defeated by evidence or logic. The whole point of their argument is to find weak spots where you really can’t prove that this particular photograph isn’t faked, or that that particular room has been used as a gas chamber (though ususally focusing on insignificant details), because if you admit that, yes, you’re right, I can’t beyond all reasonable doubt prove that that wasn’t an ordinary shower, the whole idea of the holocaust begin to crumble in the eyes of the denier (and weak minded hang arounds). If that photograph is a fake, how do we know not all is fake; if that gas chamber is a shower, how do we know that all “gas chambers” in fact aren’t showers, and so forth, and the whole jewish conspiracy is laid open in front of you. Or at least, you can show aspiring young nazis that there in fact is a conspiracy going on (look at this photograph for instance, etc).
That’s why, if you listen to or read a debate between holocaust deniers and people who knows what they are talking about, you notice the same phenomena as you see here: How the denier (or CT guy) without much sentimentality just drops his original argument when debunked, and moves on to the next presumed weak spot, and the next, and the next, until the other side is weared down. OTOH, if the other side holds ground, the denier/CT guy silently moves to another forum.
(Of course, I’m not saying these CT guys are nazis, deniers, or in any other way [except method of argument] resembles them top of the line nutjobs, nor that they in any way share those kind of believes, etc.)
That just means that Silverstein did it (Jew. Need I say more?) The theory is that Silverstein did it for the insurance money. He would want them to fall straight down so clean up would be easier. Or it was Bush. Or both. It depends on which kooky theory fits with which evildoer, even if it contradicts the last kooky theory.
Why bother, indeed?
Funny how they always come in three’s. Here’s the 411. 
I’m not on it, am I?
And the footage was shot by Stanley Kubrick, who like JFK and Elvis isn’t really dead.
Or maybe it was Walt Disney, who isn’t really dead either.
Let me take this piece by piece, then I’ll catch up on the rest of the thread.
Not likely if as claimed, there were “buffer” floors used for maintenance in towers 1 and 2.
Not likely if as claimed, there were “buffer” floors used for maintenance in towers 1 and 2.
Not likely if as claimed, there were “buffer” floors used for maintenance in towers 1 and 2.
I bet 10 people could have done this, and 9 of them are dead now. So who’s blabbing?
REALLY!
Except the towers collapsed exactly where the planes hit, which were occupied floors. So even if there were buffer floors (which there weren’t) it wouldn’t match up to what we observed.
OK. Let’ s try an analogy:
If I punch you VERY HARD in the stomach, will you,
a. Bend over double, groaning in agony. or
b. Crumble to the floor in a tidy heap.
I know which one my money’s on! Anyone betting with me? 
I’m not a skyscraper.
Use your imagination then. Have you got one, or do you just run all these
relevant “facts” through your brain, like R2D2 and, respond appropriately? 
I have it on good authority that there were actually buffers used in the towers. Here’s a photo of one:
Why, the backwards lettering in that photo convinces me it was faked. As does the vanishing cord on the right. And the suspicious lack of background scenery…
But, of course, that was all done on purpose by the government to make me think it was faked. My god, it must be real!
Answer is C: Your midsection would burst into flames and black smoke would come billowing out of all your pores. Your internal organs would leap from your body via the nearest available orifice, regardless of how high off the ground.
After 20 or 30 minutes, your head would come crashing down through your body. Each section of your body would be pulverized by the weight of the crumbling sections on top. You would indeed end up as a pile of smouldering body parts on the floor.
Then George Bush would send Dick Cheney over to break LOUIS CYPHERE’s neighbor’s kneecaps and set his house on fire.
Another fool who think’s he’s got a full-tank, but is unaware his fuel-pipe is leaking.
It really is quite sad. 
Direct personal insult are not permitted in this Forum.
Do not do this again.
[ /Moderating ]
OK. Sorry! But can I just throw this in;
“No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.” Eleanor Roosevelt
So why are you so against name-calling then, the majority of people on here do
not even use their real names. Surely there must have been some funny slanging
matches on here before you went all wussy?
Name-calling disrupts the discussion because it results in posters trying to one-up their opponents for nasty names (ands generally indicates that one’s arguments are insufficient and that one’s only recourse is to call people names).
The rule has been in place since the first days of this message board; it is not a change or recent development.
If you would like to challenge the rule or discuss a change to it, please use the The BBQ Pit Forum which is established as
[ /Moderating ]