That might be an anology if my body was 95% air and supported by a set of interior columns, external columns, and truss systems.
As it stands, I am made of meat. Thus invalidating this ‘analogy’.
Alternatively, if skyscrapers were designed to bend in the middle, like the human torso, his analogy might work. But I don’t recall them installing a giant hinge on the WTC, so I don’t think it works too well.
Are they superhuman, or just efficient beyond all dreams of man?
Oops, looks like Mr. CYPHERE has been banned. Wonder what happened?
Probably took a very hard punch in his buffer floors.
I recommend he take Bufferin for that.
He knew too much.
Obviously, this statement is not even remotely true.
Sorry, but I’ve got nothing to add, except to say this post made me laugh. Thanks for making my day.
I can’t seem to edit my response…to clarify, I just think the post is well written. I didn’t mean any sort of disrespect to victims of 9/11. I thought of the possibility it could be taken that way after rereading my post.
Heh, heh, heh. First we lure you in, then we get your $14.95 USD, THEN we let you edit for five minutes.
But only once, in 1960…
And only because he was deleting testimony that would have linked Oswald to Ruby …
Bastards! 
OK how about this:
He “knew” too much.
Not to rain on your parade any, but I left the discussion because I was strongly persuaded by the evidence presented against the CT, and felt no inclination to defend it anymore…and also had nothing to add on the opposite side of the argument, either. My ‘weak concession’ post is here; it took me a few more hours of reading and stewing on the matter for the last of my stubbornness to dissolve, and since then I’ve been of the opinion that the collapse of the towers was caused solely and entirely by the airplane collisions. (Which were not missles, biplanes, or UFOs, either. :rolleyes: ) Consider my ignorance fought.
I did not ‘move on to the next weak spot’, or find another forum to post on. Sorry to disappoint you.
(Also, sorry for my lack of sentimentality. I’ll try to argue from emotion next time. :rolleyes: )
I don’t believe he was referring to you. You didn’t exhibit the behavior he was talking about.
Hm, perhaps not. But I was the “conspiracy theorist” who started this thread, and I abandoned it shortly after having been ‘debunked’; so I was standing at least somewhat in front of the bullseye he was shooting at.
But it would have taken one of those notorious magic bullets that zig-zag to actually hit you.
Pfft. Everyone knows it wasn’t Wakinyan who was shooting at you, but an unidentified shooter on the grassy knoll.