The Secret Lives of Kelp Bass

The jibber-jabber at the local fisherman’s bar goes like this…

The problem is housing.

Kelp bass (calico bass) are ambush preditors and as such are territorial and populations are determined by available habitat and that “habitat” extends up and down the size/age range.

Smaller/younger fish are competing with each other for the available “small fish” niches and so on up to the big daddies. Everyone is competing with their neighbors no matter which size/age neighborhood they’re in.

Seems reasonable enough.

So it is said that when it comes to sport fishing regulations, fish like these should have maximum size limits and not minimum size limits. The thinking being that the largest and most mature fish should be left to reproduce and the medium sized fish should be the ones harvested as it opens up habitat for the more numerous smaller fish to move up. Of course that would be true for any size of fish, wouldn’t it? So I don’t get that.

I’ve also heard it said that size limits are bad science because catch and release is a joke and that the vast majority of caught and released fish die from their injuries/trauma. You may as well keep any fish you catch because you’ve more than likely killed it anyway.

One group thinks the only way to manage shoreline fisheries like these is by periodically closing areas to all fishing and managing the habitat like rotating agricultural fields in that some of them you work and some of them you leave to recuperate.

Is any of this real? Is their any science on this stuff?

I took a fisheries class in college and remember a lecture about catch size and regulations. The idea was that fish are always competing for food and mates, and older/larger fish have an obvious advantage over smaller/younger fish. For a healthy population you want a mix of older and younger fish, but it’s important to remove the older fish so that younger more productive members can move up. By having minimum size catch limits you can ensure that younger fish aren’t being taken, which will presumably increase the overall vitality of the population. I didn’t say this was true, it was just what we were taught, and this was over 30 years ago.

As for whether fishermen actually abide by these regulations is another story. Where I live there are heavy fines for keeping undersized fish, but very few fish and wildlife authorities to enforce the regulations. You can probably guess what often happens.

You’re talking about Crappies, right?

No. I’m talking about saltwater kelp bass.

“Calico bass” is one of the popular names for what we call the crappie in this region. I’ve read that the crappie (pronounced "croppie in these parts) it is a true bass.

Please allow me to walk that back some. The fresh-water calico bass is a crappie, but the marine calico, or kelp bass is quite a different animal. You can see in images of the two fish that the fin structure is quite different.

Wow. Our freshwater crappie is called a bunch of different names, many with “bass” in the name, depending on who you talk to. But I couldn’t figure out how you could work “kelp” into the name.

Freshwater crappie are called black bass, calico bass, and paper mouths around here.

After Xmas people take their trees to lakes that are frozen over. Chain a few tree trunks to some concrete blocks and leave them where you want to add fish habitat. When the lack thaws, the structure goes to the bottom. And you know a place to check out the next time you fish the lake.

After Xmas people take their trees to lakes that are frozen over…

Christmas here is usually in the 60’s and the only frozen things are the margaritas. Dumping dead trees in the ocean is illegal.

Hopefully someone will come along that knows about saltwater kelp bass.

I hope it’s not bad form to answer your own question (in a dead thread) but I couldn’t let this go so I kept digging and not surprisingly, it turns out the California Department of Fish and Wildlife has done the studies and lays it all out beautifully. I found it a pleasure to read and thought others may as well.

Kelp (Calico) Bass (Paralabrax clathratus) Status of the Population (.pdf)

If habitat is the limiting factor (IOW there are plenty of young fish born but nowhere for them to occupy and they subsequently die), then you aren’t really helping at all by removing young fish to make way for other young fish. You can’t grow a population if there’s not enough habitat to support them; kind of like continually evicting residents from an apartment building to make room for new tenants; you still only have X-number of units to occupy.

Size and bag limits are heavily influenced by harvest pressure; in the case of this species harvest seems to be mainly driven by angling pressure by people (the linked PDF describes over 1.5 million fish harvested annually). When you have high enough angling pressure you start to impact the age structure of a population, and you can get into trouble if you influence it the wrong way (even if you leave high overall numbers).

Managers need to have specific goals as to how they want to manage the populations; there’s not “1 right answer” as to management. There are different types of fisheries and they are not all compatible with each other; two general types are trophy fisheries and harvest fisheries. Generally speaking, you can manage for big fish or abundant fish, but you can’t have both at the same time.

If your goal is to have a trophy fishery (abundant large fish), you generally have to have very low (or no) harvest, and as little angling pressure as possible - since even C&R angling removes some fish via hooking mortality. If you want a harvest fishery (to fill your freezer with), you’ll need to protect your up and coming young fish until they can spawn a time or two. Harvest fisheries (with a few exceptions) will usually not be able to produce many big fish.

Maximum size limits would target young fish for harvest, and if angling pressure is high enough (as it sounds like it could be approaching for these types of species), you can end up in a situation where the majority of young fish are taken out and not enough of them survive to become large fish. Also, you’ll still be impacting the large fish by hooking mortality even if you release them. Minimum size limits are set to allow fish to spawn at least once, maybe more before they are targeted. You don’t need trophy sized fish to sustain a population, but you do need minimum recruitment and taking out your next generation can very risky from a management perspective.

No, size limits are not bad science nor is C&R a joke. Mortality from C&R angling varies by species, environmental conditions, and experience of the angler. For fresh water lotic and lentic species I work with it’s generally predicted to be about 5%, plus or minus 2-3%.

It heavily depends upon the amount of angling pressure the area/s experience. If angling pressures are low enough you can keep them open and still maintain sustainable fish populations. If you have very high angling pressure however, closing certain areas doesn’t help much because that angling pressure will simply shift 5 miles down the coast and decimate the fish in open areas.

There are numerous books, modeling systems, and decades of research on fish population management, and more is known than people realize. A difficulty however is that most of the people who talk about the topic don’t understand how it’s actually done nor seek that knowledge out, and subsequently spread a lot of bad information based on their assumptions.