The Stars My Destination movie

David DiGilio To Script ‘The Stars My Destination’ Based On Sci-Fi Classic

I’ve been waiting for years for Hollywood to get round to one of the greatest SF writers of all time, the inimitable Alfred Bester. And now not just one but two movies are in the offing!

The first is one of his best novels, The Stars My Destination, aka Tiger! Tiger! in the UK. For those who don’t know this truly amazing book here’s the opening of the plot from Wikipedia.

And then we have his classic novelette Fondly Fahrenheit, being filmed under the title The Juliet.

I became an avid Bester fan in the 60s and he really is one of the most incredible scifi writers ever. Another classic novel of his is The Demolished Man about a society where telepaths form the elite. I cannot wait to see these movies, I just hope they do the works justice.

For those who don’t know Bester here’s a taste, a really funny short story about time travel. (It’s a PDF file.)

The Men Who Murdered Mohammed.

The Stars my Destination is good, yes (though not as good as its proponents make it out to be), but the things that make it good are none of them things that would translate well to the big screen. The only three possible outcomes are that we’ll get something true to the book but incomprehensible, something that works well on the screen but bears no resemblance to the book, or something incomprehensible that bears no resemblance to the book, and the last is the most likely of the three.

I think it could be filmed well, but at the cost of a truly mass audience - barring a fluke. I’d much rather see it adapted at the level of “Predestination” (from Heinlein’s “All You Zombies–”) than “Blade Runner” - the bigger the budget gets and the more key bits of the story get changed.

I confess those are my worries too although I still think it’s worth a shot. As for how good it is we all have a soft spot for the books we loved when young but it was enormously influential, especially on Babylon 5. (On second thoughts that may have been The Demolished Man, but still Bester.)

Yeah, I’m just referring to people who call it “the best SF story ever”, or the like. It’s not that good.

I agree. It’s like all those fans who want Moon is a Harsh Mistress made into a movie.

(A HBO miniseries, maybe, but not a movie)

Between this and “The Demolished Man”, I always preferred the latter.

I’d have to agree with this. It’ll be “I, Robot”.

If you’re talking about the 2004 movie I, Robot, the problem with it wasn’t that they messed up in adapting the book. The problem was that the original script wasn’t adapted from the book at all. It started in 1995 as an original script by Jeff Vintar called Hardwired with almost no resemblance to I, Robot except that it was about robots. It bounced around Hollywood for several years. Finally someone decided that it would be nice to use the title I, Robot, so they bought the rights to the title from Asimov’s estate. They grafted a few ideas from the book onto the script. There was a revision of the script by Akiva Goldman later. In some ways, the story resembles Asimov’s The Caves of Steel more than I, Robot:

I’ve long said that the opening scenes of The Stars my Destination would make a killer opening for a movie. I’ve filmed it in my head many times:

Sudden opening – a stark Chord rivets our attention as a battered space ship appears onscreen in the midst of a starfield. It’s clearly dead. (We don’t know why or how. It’s not important. Clearly something devastating happened to the ship that tore big chunks out of it.) It’s missing big pieces of the ship, the lights are out. The image is tilted slightly askew to help convey the image of it drifting.

The camera moves about the ship, going in through one of the huge gaps in the side to explore the interior. we see broken wires, bashed-in walls and bulkheads. A dessicated body floats by. We see occasional LEDs on panels to show that the power is not completely gone, but there’s no sign of life. We could maybe run credits during this camera exploration of the ship.

The camera approaches a free-standing storage locker head-on, so the audience is clued in that this is significant, for some reason.

The door suddenly bursts open, spilling dust and debris into the ship as the remaining air in the locker blasts out into the vacuum. Gully Foyle in his suit (marked with his name Foyle) emerges, carrying an oxygen bottle. We hear his breathing (a la 2001) which provides the only sound, and which tells or reminds us of his critical need for oxygen. We see him make his way into the ship. He gets to the gas storage area. He checks the gauge on his cylinder. It’s all the way down in the red, marked “Empty”. He stows it in one side and retrieves a cylinder from the other side. He tests the value, and the gauge is in the green. “Full”. We can see there are only so many remaining.

Foyle goes about the shop, checking things, getting more food and water. On a whim, he takes a book from the captain’s cabin. He goes back to the storage locker we saw him emerge from. He closes and seals the door, then cracks open the gas cylinder. An indicator on the wall beeps and turns green with an indication “normal pressure”. Only then does he remove his helmet and take a deep breath.

We see him open the containers and east and drink. It’s a very close and confined space. As he eats, he takes out the book he brought. It contains reports on the personnel. We go past several pages, each with a name and a picture, each indicating a crewmember. All are dead now. We should know this because only Foyle seems to be alive, but maybe he has crossed off their pictures with a pencil. Only his own picture is unmarked. We pan down to the captain’s comments, which indicate that Foyle has potential, but does not fulfill it. He is dull and unmotivated.

Foyle closes the book and continues to eat and drink, mechanically, just staring ahead. It’s clear that, even with imminent death staring him in the face when his oxygen runs out, he is unmotivated.
Blackout

Latyer. Foyle bursts forth from his locker again, as before. He makes his way through the ship and repeats his actions from before. As he’s on his way back, h looks through a breach in the ship’s side and sees something. It’s a ship! It gleams brightly and with the promise of rescue. Foyle clumsaily makes his way to a small storage unit labeled “Flares”. He pulls out a Flare Gun and a couple of Flares. He loads one into the gun, taking several tries to do it as he tries to make his way quickly back to the breach.

The Ship is still there! In fact, it’s closer now, looking the derelict over. Foyle aims his flare out through the side and pulls the trigger. The Flare leaps out and creates a bright and blinding swath of signal that cannot possibly be missed.

The ship has clearly seen it. It suddenly changes course and comes close, inspecting the damaged ship and the place where the flare came from. We see only black ports in the side, no sign of life. The ship stops, We see it reflected in Foyle’s faceplate, and can read the name backwards in the reflection –

Vorga

We see Foyle’s face. He smiles, and starts making his way out. we hear his accelerated breathing as we look from his POV at the ship. He’s about to be rescued!

Suddenly the ship starts, turns away, and accelerates off.

we look back at Foyle from the outside. We see his startled expression as this chance at life is pulled away from him. We don’t hear the implied “No!”

The ship disappears to a point.

We look back through Foyle’s faceplate. He is transformed. He is mouthing words we cannot hear in the vacuum of space. His expression changes from surprise to fear to anger to intense loathing.

Suddenly we’re back inside that helmet. We hear his heightened breathing. He says clearly and with intensity:

“I kill you deadly, Vorga!”

THEN we see him immediately turn to the task of getting the ship moving again, as Bester describes. He tries and fails and uses his ingenuity to get the ship moving. Foyle has found his Purposwe in Life.

THAT’S how you film the opening to grab everyone by the scruff of the neck and keep them watching. I think a skilled writer and director can keep that pace up for the whole movie. It’s not necessary to film every damned detail of the book. You don’t need voice-overs, crawls, and narration. It’s better if you don’t have them.

I’ve had the feeling, by the way, that the film Event Horizon has something to do with The Stars my Destination. Even though the film is utterly different in plot, characters, and tone, you’ve got a derelict ship and you’ve got the image of the Burning Man. I get the feeling that someone wanted to film TSMD, but couldn’t get the backing or the approval or a usable script or something.

As I see it, the problem with adapting The Stars My Destination for film is that it’s really two books in one. On one hand, it’s the Count of Monte Cristo in space; on the other, it’s an exploration of what the world would be like if everyone could teleport. In a novel, there’s plenty of time to flesh out both ideas. In a film, you would have to spend so much time explaining the whole “everyone teleports” scenario that the story would suffer.

Why would you have to spend time explaining it? You can leave out 90% of it as completely irrelevant to the story. You don’t even have to include the stuff about Jaunt if you didn’t want to, but I can see how you could work it in.

Remember, just because Bester included all the nifty stuff about the social implications of jaunting and its ramifications doesn’t mean that you, the filmmaker, have to put it in. Audiences are familiar enough with the concept of teleportation that all you really need to do is make clear to them the rules in this situation. (You don’t need a Star Trek-like Transporter, different people can teleport to different ranges; not everybody can do it; etc.)

In the time constraints of a movie, either you explore the concept and have no time for anything else, or you leave it unexplored, with all of your audience scratching their heads about all the obvious implications you ignored.

Of course, people never make movies leaving obvious implications unexplored.

To say that you HAVE to explore everything, and that since you can’t, the movie can’t be made, is twaddle.

I didn’t know all that! That certainly explains a great deal.

“Gee, Professor, I know you done told me, but how DOES the Dimension-Buster Valve work?”

:slight_smile:

It could have been worse, they could have used that script for Bug Hunt at Outpost Nine that was also floating around at about that time.

Love it!

I’ve shot the trailer in my mind many times… the Foyle actor, who has a voice like Tom Waits doing Alan Rickman, or the reverse, simply reads the four lines of the quatrain, intercut with action shots. (ETA: final version.)

The ending would have to be left alone. At most, use the same model as Avatar: close in on Foyle, sleeping, and a beat and a half later than expected, his eyes snap open. Smash to black. This might work a little better if the film establishes some sort of eye effect for jaunting, and this time he has it turned up to 11.

I prefer “filthy”. But otherwise spot-on.