The story of the Jews escaping slavery in Egypt and wandering the desert is fiction, right?

I have a Jewish heritage on my mother’s side, but she didn’t practice the religion, and neither do I. I have, however, sat in on a few Seders in my lifetime (the last in college, more than 25 years ago).

As a result, I am familiar generally with one of the foundational stories of the Jewish people: that they were slaves in Egypt, and that Moses (aided by God) led them to freedom, where they wandered the desert for 40 years.

It’s all fiction, right?

I mean no disrespect at all, but it’s my understanding that there is no record of Jewish slavery, or an Exodus, in Ancient Egypt (and they kept good records). The pyramids weren’t even built by slaves.

And we can expect a clear archeological record of a nomadic people, yet it is my understanding that there is no evidence for Jewish nomads for several decades.

Am I wrong? Is there some historical record that does match (however vaguely) the biblical story of the Jewish people’s origins? Or is it indeed mythology, no more accurate that the story of. Romulus and Remus suckling on a she-wolf.

My understanding is that your understanding understands history correctly. It’s all myth, compiled and interleaved from multiple ancient source documents. Some later events do have historical backing, but a good bit of myth is, so to speak, larded among the known wars and kings.

Moses?
Not so much.

It’s allegorical. I was raised Reform Jewish and was taught that it was allegorical.

That is a mighty big allegory that is taken to be fact by a lot of believers.

I can only speak for my particular upbringing. Biblical literalism and how many people follow that is probably out of scope for this debate but it’s not anywhere close to a majority of humanity.

I didn’t say humanity, and I didn’t say majority.

Moderating: You’re going off-topic pretty early @Czarcasm. Please refrain.

Given how long ago it was, I don’t think you can disprove the thesis that some group of proto-Israelites escaped slavery in Egypt in ways that they perceived to be miraculous, and then built a religion around the experience.

But clearly it can’t be literally true as written. By the Biblical account, there were about 2 million Israelites leaving Egypt, and certainly we’d expect a group that size to have left clear archaeological evidence. And it’s hard to imagine that at least the more dramatic Plagues wouldn’t have been noted by Egyptian historians; “hey, remember that time when it was pitch dark for three days and then a whole bunch of people died for no apparent reason?”

I don’t think fiction is correct word. The historical consensus is they are a set of myths that have some basis in real events (though the basis could be “ancient Egypt was a real place, and it was ruled by a pharaoh, and they had some interactions with Semitic Canaanite people from the the regions described in Genesis and Exodus, during a time period loosely corresponding to when the stories where meant to have taken place”)

Historians being historians there are some who reject even that and say the entire thing was actually fiction made up completely during the Babylonian exile. But that’s a minority view.

It’s a comforting mythology for the Israelites as God’s chosen people. “If Egypt couldn’t wipe us out, no one can. That’s the power of our God.”

Summary

But I do believe Israel is God’s chosen people. A lot of Christians believe that. They just screw up all the time, like they did in the Bible with the golden calf, and like they’re doing in modern times with the Palestinian genocide. But if Hitler couldn’t wipe them out, no one will.

And they’re wrong about Jesus, of course. He really is the son of God. But not the Jesus that conservative Christians try to fit into their worldview. The biblical Jesus.

ETA: Sorry, got off-topic.

The bulk of your post belongs in a different thread. It is the perfect jumping off post for a complete hijack of the OP.

I’m going to hide most of it.

Moderating:

Egypt definitely ruled over the land where the Israelite culture emerged just before it did. I can see how a story of conquest by Egypt would easily morph into a cultural foundation story where the people were literally enslaved in Egypt.

I’m reasonably sure there is a general consensus that Egypt did have semitic people serving as slaves or servants. So that would also add to the story. No proof the proto-Israelites were held in Egypt, but related tribes at least and it is not unlikely that some descendants ended being Israelites.

The Egyptians certainly kept slaves from the Middle east. Lots of them in fact, depending on the period. They didnt differentiate them by religion.

Right. More myth than legend, but likely some small kernel of truth there. But they werent really recognized as “The Jewish people” until much later, around 1200BC and likely somewhat earlier.

Note that the Stele mentions “Carried off is Asqaluni” and that means “carried off into slavery”, and that region is well within Israel (Ashkelon). So, yeah, Semitic peoples carried off into slavery- maybe proto Jewish? or when they bragged " Israel is laid waste—its seed is no more;" they also looted slaves- which was standard practice.

So saying “there is no evidence the Ancient Egyptians had slaves from that region” is totally bogus.

Make sense.

So as I said- more myth than legend, but likely some fairly well educated people, whose ancestors were captured as slaves- made the trek “back home” during one of the 'weak pharaoh" periods.

“Wandering for 40 years” is highly doubtful, since the OT was full of numerology, instead of real numbers.

I concur.

Some scholars feel that the earlier Plagues would have been read by the original audience as parodies of everyday inconveniences of Egyptian life. A modern equivalent would be a story about an escape from New York City in which the LORD cursed New York with traffic jams, and weakened the hearts of their football teams so they could not play well.

Also, AFAIK there is no other people in the world whose origin myth has them starting out as slaves, so (assuming that it’s true), that’s further evidence for some kernel of historical fact in the myth.

To be clear, the Bible does not have Hebrews building pyramids. I think the pyramids were built sometime like a thousand years before any Hebrews were in Egypt.

I’m sure I recall a Straight Dope column on this, but can’t find it. I did find some related threads while searching; this 2015 one seems most relevant:

Why was Jewish slavery and exodus from Egypt fabricated?

Also, it would leave plenty of evidence, much of which would still exist in a desert environment even after so long.

Right, the Bible says they were building “storehouse cities”, which the commentators interpret as “cities with storehouses for grain”. I mention this mainly because it gives us one more opportunity to laugh at Ben Carson, and point out that pyramids were not used to store grain.