Last I recall, it was about 20% of the population. So, unless it’s changed substantially in the past year, that puts Republican tea-baggers at ~2.5 the concentration of the general public.
Depends. I hope you’ll consider what it says instead of just copying some blog?Consider:
Your own cites keep proving it.
Nope, alas, Gallup/USAToday appears to have fucked up on that one (and to nitpick, you wrote “four percent” when you meant “four percentage points”, but that’s a quibble).
The poll that you linked to claims that 79% of self-identified Tea Party supporters, as compared to 75% of the total population, falls in the category “Non-Hispanic white”.
But they apparently misread the demographic data for the total population, which indicates that the “75% white” figure INCLUDES Hispanic and Latino whites.
EXCLUDING Hispanics and Latinos from the US white population brings the white population down to only 65% of the total.
So if the self-identified Tea Party supporters are in fact 79% non-Hispanic whites, that makes them about FOURTEEN percentage points “whiter” than the general population, not four percentage points.
Well, thats damned white of them.
How you figure? If blacks make up 6% of the self-described tea-party supporters, and if the tea-party supporters make up 28% of the US adult population, then that makes about 1.7% of the US adult population that is both black and pro-tea-party.
Whereas if black adults are 11% of the US adult population, and if 65% of eligible black adults voted in 2008 (assuming for convenience that “black adults eligible to vote” equals “all black adults”), and 90% of those black voters voted for Obama, then that’s about 6.4% of the US adult population who are black Obama voters.
1.7% plus 6.4% equals only 8.1%, which leaves nearly 3% of the US adult population that is black but neither a tea-party supporter nor an Obama voter.
So the claim that black tea-party supporters must overlap with black Obama voters seems to be total bollocks. I think you must have forgotten that “90% of black voters” doesn’t equate to “90% of all blacks”.
So seventy percent of a fiscal conservatism movement identify as conservatives? This is hardly some great revelation. It’s practically a tautology.
The pretense is that it’s a widespread, populist movement. The right wing media would desperately like people to believe it contains a lot of disenchanted Obama voters when in reality it’s virtually all McCain/Palin voters having a temper tantrum because they lost.