And it is bad. It is, really, really, really, really bad. This series got a backdoor pilot on an episode of Nancy Drew, and it is to science fiction what the CW’s Nancy Drew is to mysteries. With Nancy Drew, the solution to mysteries is always that a ghost or a witch or a ghost witch did it. On the new Tom Swift, the science/technology is bad enough to make a Star Trek: Discovery writer’s jaw to drop in shock.
I struggled to finish the first episode, and I think I won’t be back for the second.
Sounds very true to the original books, whose science ranged from vaguely accurate to ludicrously absurd. Much like Q’s gadgets for James Bond, whatever weird thing Tom had just invented always ended up being exactly what he needed to save the day.
You will find a lot of things in the Tom Swift books: stalwart heroes, dastardly villains, cringe-worthy comic relief, wildly inventive “science,” racism, sexism, and Tom’s inordinate fondness for switching off the engine of his flying machines in mid-air, so that he could “volplane to earth,” which was his favorite method of landing any aircraft. What you will not find, interestingly enough, are “Tom Swifties.” It just wasn’t really a thing.
Well, in the Nancy Drew backdoor pilot he came looking for a meteorite to turn into rocket fuel for a mission to Saturn. The first episode includes the mission to Saturn (by his father) in a contraption that looks pretty much like a SR-71 Blackbird. It includes zero-delay communications between Earth and Saturn. And in a quest sure to involve the next few episodes if not the entire season
A data capsule launched back from the ship to Earth broke up in the atmosphere on re-entry, scattering debris across the US (in random directions, not just the flight path) and Tom is going to go around the country and collect all the debris so that he can reassemble the capsule and read the data.
I have a whole bunch of the original Tom Swift books, and there is nary a Tom Swifty in them. I was quite disappointed. The name does come from them, but not the joke.
The original books (written by the guy who wrote Uncle Wiggly) were reasonably scientifically accurate for the time. The 1950s - 1960 revisions were scientifically laughable, with immense numbers of impossible machines thrown in.
I have a few of the third series with Tom Swift III in space. Boring, not even amusingly bad…
The examples are of adverbs attached to speech tags. Lots of writers do that (J.K. Rowling can’t get enough of it!). What doesn’t happen is the adverb forming a pun with what’s being said.
TS was a precursor to Elon Musk. I had some of the early books, and I remember asking my mom what a runabout was. From the book, “Tom Swift and his Electric Runabout”.
That’s been my impression, too; that a fair number of people believe that the punning adverbs were a regular feature of the books. I won’t claim that there were never any usages like that (using “hotly” when talking about temperature, for example), but if so, they were very rare and most likely unintentional.
It’s like how some people think that the Sherlock Holmes stories used “ejaculated” for “said” all the time, when in reality it was only done once or twice.
Same here. From the trailers I’d seen I wasn’t sure I was going to like it, and the first fifteen minutes or so pretty much confirmed that opinion. I forced myself to watch the whole episode just in case it improved. It didn’t. I removed it from my DVR recording schedule immediately afterwards.
You may now resume your discussions of the origin of Tom Swifties and the quality of the science in the original books.