Dept. of Portation since trans do not exist.
Though I’m holding out for the Dept. of Xportation! Hi Elon!
Now I’m wondering if Trump and Musk have created a clandestine Dept. of Xploitation to fleece money from the country.
I asked ChatGpt for an analysis of the answer, and for its thoughts on the intelligence of the person giving the answer. This was its reply:
That answer is highly disorganized, rambling, and filled with non-sequiturs and digressions. From a purely communication and reasoning standpoint, it shows:
- Lack of clear structure — The speaker jumps from topic to topic (e.g., from team names to quarterbacks’ family members) with no clear logic.
- Repetition and filler — Words and phrases like “uh,” “you know,” and repeated references to people not central to the question indicate difficulty in focusing.
- Vague references — Terms like “they” are used without clarification, making the argument hard to follow.
- Poor articulation of a position — The main point (about team names and heritage) is buried under unrelated commentary.
Based on that:
- IQ Estimate: It would be unfair to assign an IQ score based on a single unstructured spoken response, especially without context like the person’s background, stress level, or speaking style. But the way the answer is delivered would not suggest particularly high verbal reasoning or clarity of thought — qualities typically associated with high IQ.
- College Graduate? Possibly, but not necessarily. The language and structure are not what you’d expect from someone with strong academic training in communication, critical thinking, or public speaking.
- Intelligence? Intelligence is multifaceted — this response shows poor verbal reasoning, but it doesn’t conclusively speak to the person’s intelligence in other areas like social or practical intelligence. However, based solely on this answer, one might not assume the speaker is particularly analytical or articulate.
TL;DR: The answer sounds like it’s coming from someone who’s not especially articulate or focused — not necessarily unintelligent, but certainly not showcasing strong reasoning or communication skills in that moment.
I put in an answer Barack Obama gave during an interview while he was still a Senator. I asked for a similar analysis as well as a comparison to the person who gave the answer to the football question.
This response is a strong contrast to the one about the Washington Commanders, both in content and delivery. Here’s an analysis based on clarity, reasoning, and expression:
IQ and Cognitive Indicators
- High Verbal Intelligence: The speaker articulates complex ideas fluently, using abstract reasoning, analogies, and historical context. This indicates a high verbal IQ, likely in the top quartile (above 120) or even higher.
- Structured Thinking: The response is organized, progresses logically, and connects multiple topics (citizenship, economic disparity, political engagement, foreign policy) into a coherent narrative. That shows strong executive functioning and critical thinking skills.
- Analytical Depth: There’s a clear effort to move beyond surface-level talking points — the speaker diagnoses problems (like political disengagement and dishonest debate), references historical precedents (e.g., Marshall Plan, Truman era), and emphasizes civic responsibility. This is typical of someone with graduate-level education or equivalent intellectual discipline.
Likely Educational Background
- Almost certainly a college graduate, and likely advanced degree holder (JD, MA, PhD, etc.).
- The reference to writing a book and citing historical events with fluency suggests a person who has studied policy, law, or history at a high level.
Comparison to the First Speaker (Football Team Name Answer)
Trait First Speaker (Football) Second Speaker (Citizenship) Clarity Rambling, unfocused Clear, structured Reasoning Repetitive, emotional appeal Analytical, historical context Vocabulary Simple, repetitive Rich, precise Education level Possibly high school or some college College graduate, likely advanced degree Verbal IQ estimate Below average to average (~90–105) High to very high (possibly 125–140+)
Conclusion
The second speaker is very likely an intelligent, well-educated individual, possibly with professional experience in law, academia, or policy. The first speaker, by contrast, displays less clarity of thought and communication skill, which suggests lower formal education or cognitive performance in verbal domains.
If you’re curious — the second response is consistent in tone and quality with someone like Barack Obama in interviews or public discussions.
I miss our pre-clusterfuck times.
We all do.
He did pronounce “Massapequa” correctly. No clue why some High School team on Long Island was part of this string of verbal garbage.
It’s an Algonquin name (as there were many tribes once on Long Island it’s generally okay to consider them all Algonquin). Perhaps close to the majority of town names on Long Island are Algonquin: Montauk, Ammagansett, Quoge and many more. Some few remain with their Dutch names, yet the rest are boring British or American names.
Of course I want to boo the Chiefs. They were a neighboring main competitor against my high school football Team at Farmingdale High, with the not too offensive name ''Dalers"
Whatever drugs Trump is on are not helping. Cognitively he is not all there (I mean…less so…) - in a different way than I saw in Biden and Reagan II.
I don’t know if he has to take the “Quebec Cognitive Test” (man, woman, TV) and what happens if he’s loony toons. His doctor is too. He’s the fittest, healthiest President to ever walk the Earth.
The 25th has only been used for medical reasons: Colonoscopies and such. There is no way it will be used in the way it was meant, which ought to have been recognized by the writers of it.
Essentially, the secondary leadership execute what could be described as a coup d’etat. Any of the “cohorts” could “tell” on the VP and that won’t go over well.
“Captain, you are insane. I am relieving you of duty till the doctor checks you out.”
Even if that could be done, retribution and revenge are trumps favourite dishes to serve. Hot.
Nm, it’s getting late
They’re going to be deporting people from 3rd party countries to Rwanda now.
And (this one is a few months old but I don’t recall hearing about it) they sent a bunch of people from 3rd party countries to a jungle camp in Panama.
Yeah Newsday has long been paywalled. Thanks for the context. Massapequa is the home of the Baldwin brothers - yet Baldwin is another town on Long Island.
So I’ll pick up the fight (just for Long Island)
(dunno the mascot or their anti-native practices)
- Sachem East Arrows
- Sachem North Flaming Arrows
“Sachem” means “Chief”
- Bay Shore Marauders
- Brentwood Indians
- ** East Islip Redmen**
No prob with Marauders, other than that sounds cool. I hope not offensive. Up to Brentwood and East Islip what to choose.
If the NY Regents - if the now leaderless DOGE boys want me to assess team name and offensiveness, they will be invoiced.
There’s been a meme/joke out there for years that whatever the dosage is for the drugs Trump’s taking, it’s either too much or not enough.
Calling Putin “Vladimir” in his post is an odd word choice. Is he really so stupid as to believe he has a personal relationship with him?
I do realize that any question that starts with is Trump stupid enough … can be answered in the affirmative.
It comes off as unnatural at best, and seems really inappropriate. I can’t decide if, as you say, he thinks they’re buds, and he’s showing off? The first time I read it, I heard it in my head as a female voice pretending to ward off her lover, 1950s style.
The article speculates (though without a cite) that Disney may remove the speaking role traditionally reserved for the sitting president.
I’d love to see that happen, if only to watch the faux outrage from the MAGATs, most of whom wouldn’t be caught dead inside the Hall of Presidents anyway, lest they accidentally learn something.
That has been my fervent hope for almost a decade now.
Hehe, a homosexual friend of mine described “Vladimir, STOP!” as “just the faggiest quote”. I hadn’t thought of it that way, but now I can’t help but hear it that way.
Reading this comment, I visualized Trump extending his arm out, his palm facing Putin while tossing his hair as he looks away and breathily says “Stop!” Something like Trump-as-Ilsa and Putin-as-Rick in this Casablanca scene.
Thanks a lot.
Or like Diana Ross. “Stop!.. in the naaaaaame of love”
Did Trump forget the safe word?
It’s camera, TV, woman or …jeeze I forget.
Does Disney still build audioanimatronic Presidents? Or do we need to use Kickstarter?