The Trump Administration: The Clusterfuck Continues

HOLY CRAP!

(The link above goes to AOL.)

Trump transition team compiling list of current and former U.S. military officers for possible courts-martial

The Trump transition team is compiling a list of senior current and former U.S. military officers who were directly involved in the withdrawal from Afghanistan and exploring whether they could be court-martialed for their involvement, according to a U.S. official and a person familiar with the plan.

Officials working on the transition are considering creating a commission to investigate the 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan, including gathering information about who was directly involved in the decision-making for the military, how it was carried out, and whether the military leaders could be eligible for charges as serious as treason, the U.S. official and person with knowledge of the plan said.

Who was the Number One Individual involved in the withdrawal? Oh, yes. 'Twas the president who made the agreement with the Taliban in the first place. Yeah, let’s try that twerp for treason.

This is even more proof Trump hates the military.

In my occasional anarchist wet-dreams, this could occur. Then I wake up and I need mom to clean the sheets for me.

We’re going to be farked. (The link goes to Yahoo.)

President-elect Donald Trump has selected Chris Wright, a campaign donor and fossil fuel executive, to serve as energy secretary in his upcoming, second administration.

CEO of Denver-based Liberty Energy, Wright is a vocal advocate of oil and gas development, including fracking, a key pillar of Trump’s quest to achieve U.S. “energy dominance” in the global market.

Wright has been one of the industry’s loudest voices against efforts to fight climate change, and could give fossil fuels a boost, including quick action to end a year-long pause on natural gas export approvals by the Biden administration.

First, one of Trump’s supplicants wants to take away benefits to veterans by de-authorizing the VA, and now these turds want to recall senior military officers to active duty to courts-martial them for ‘treason’ for following legal orders of the Commander-in-Chief? These people don’t seem to realize that many veterans have, as Liam Neeson would say, “a very particular set of skills”, and as a group tend to be better armed than ‘Antifa’ protestors and angry college kids. They also clearly skipped history class the day they talked about the “Bonus Army”.

What a bunch of self-defeating, nihilistic, stupid motherfuckers, just shitting all over themselves and smearing it on the wall just for yucks.

Stranger

I’m not ex-military, but I’m guessing the average Trump-supporting enlisted man can probably be fairly easily convinced that the generals purposely messed up the Afghan withdrawal, and a court-martial is justified. Note: not saying all enlisted men are Trump supporting, but I’d be unsurprised if it were true.

Look at post WWI Germany (and presumably other defeated countries) where “our leaders betrayed us”.

Government which does nothing. Yet another example of four dimensional chess mastery…

Comedian John Mulaney has a bit about how Trump was a hobo’s idea of a rich guy. “One day I’ll have big buildings, with my own name on them in big letters. And I’ll have hair made of gold…”. He jokes Trump heard this hobo rambling and adapted it as his life philosophy.

Maybe, when younger, Trump read about the Chinese philosophy of wu wei… government which does nothing?

wu wei, as found in the Daodejing and Zhuangzi, to denote two different things.

1. An “attitude of genuine non-action, motivated by a lack of desire to participate in human affairs” and
2. A “technique by means of which the one who practices it may gain enhanced control of human affairs”.

The first is quite in line with the contemplative Daoism of the Zhuangzi. Some believe that “contemplative Daoism” came first, and “purposive Daoism” second.

Described as a source of serenity in Daoist thought, only rarely do Daoist texts suggest that ordinary people could gain political power through wu wei. The Zhuangzi does not seem to indicate a definitive philosophical idea, simply that the sage “does not occupy himself with the affairs of the world”.

Meh. On second thought, this seems unlikely.

That is certainly plausible (and the typical contempt that enlisted have for the lack of competence of high ranking officers is often not misplaced) but hobbling the already underfunded and understaffed Veterans Administration is not going to win friends and influence people even among Trump-loving vets. Even Reagan was smart enough not to fuck with veterans’ benefits, and despite a pledge to reduce government size and budget (which he ultimately did not) he actually elevated the Veterans Administration to a Cabinet-level department as a means of assuring Vietnam War vets who were suffering from chronic illness that they would not be abandoned.

Trump and these people he is surrounding himself with aren’t as smart as Reagan, who whatever else you think about him, was not our most intellectually distinguished presidents. But he’s still a fucking MacArthur Genius in comparison to Trump, who has not thought this through or learned any lesson from any history class that he likely snooze through because it wasn’t about him. Or more succinctly, in the cruder parlance of our times, “Fuck around and find out.”

Stranger

As a Canuck, I’d never heard of the US “Bonus Army”. I appreciate the link.

I think most of those who serve in the military are underpaid and often taken advantage of. They generally deserve their benefits, and removing these is unwise.

One of the few positive effects of Trump is it may force Canada to support its own threadbare forces. Certainly we need to be able to defend our Arctic borders in the near future. More than 75% of Canadians think more funding is needed. Canada could use a proper intelligence service too, but only if it has meaningful oversight.

The New York Times has a solid article on why Trump’s picks will prove unpopular (at which point Trump will probably abandon some of them).

Excerpt:

My colleague Ezra Klein, has written, for example, about the power that “the groups” — progressive activist organizations — exercise over Democratic policy. They demand that politicians focus on issues that might be important, but that are often not matters of majority concern. Or, even worse, they demand political fealty to positions that majorities reject.

In many administrations, this dynamic results in a kind of tug of war between the activists who demand attention to their pet causes and the political realists who grab the candidate’s arm and tap the sign that reads, “It’s the economy, stupid. And then, every few years, the majority steps back in, determines whether politicians have taken care of prices, crime and peace, and then ruthlessly punishes failure — regardless of whether the activists got what they wanted, and even if they might agree with the activists’ concerns.

With Trump, the dynamic is different. He’s so consumed with his grievances and his base’s grievances that rather than there being a tug of war between activists and pragmatists for the politician’s attention, the activists and the politician are both aligned against the pragmatists.. That was the clear direction of Trump’s first term. At first he surrounded himself with serious people. Think of the contrast, for example, between Jim Mattis as secretary of defense and Pete Hegseth, or between Alex Azar, the secretary of health and human services for most of Trump’s first term, and an anti-vax conspiracy theorist like Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

But the serious people told him no. They tried to block his worst instincts. So they were purged. Throughout the campaign, Trump ran with two messages. On the airwaves, he convinced millions of Americans that they were electing the Trump of January 2019, when inflation was low, and the border was under reasonable control. At his rallies, he told MAGA that it was electing the Trump of January 2021, the man unleashed from establishment control and hellbent on burning it all down.

But here is his fundamental problem: The desires of his heart and the grievances of his base are ultimately incompatible with the demands of the majority, and the more he pursues his own priorities, the more he’ll revive his opposition. He’ll end his political career as an unpopular politician who ushered in a Democratic majority yet again.

The reason goes deeper than ideology (many of his nominees are extremists) or scandal (Kennedy, Hegseth, and Matt Gaetz, each have their own histories of alleged sexual misconduct, for example). Ultimately, it goes to competence: Can you do the job we ultimately hired you to do?

Source:

This article discusses veterans benefits and other potential programs that could be cut by DOGE.

10 programs that could be on the ‘government efficiency’ chopping block

Vivek Ramaswamy, Elon Musk’s partner at President-elect Donald Trump’s planned spending panel, suggested defunding programs that Congress no longer authorizes. Here are some of those.

Limited gift link:
https://wapo.st/40RUgi6

Normal link of same article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/11/16/trump-musk-ramaswamy-doge-program/?itid=hp_mv-top-stories_world-biz-tech_p007_f005

And many suffer lifelong physical injuries, occupational disabilities, chronic illness, and mental health issues due to their service even if they weren’t directly traumatized in combat. Providing health care and other benefits ‘gratis’ is almost the definition of the absolute bare fucking minimum we, as a society, should do for people who have served with the potential for being put in harm’s way. (And yes, I realize that many veterans ‘work the system’ to get the maximum benefits to which they are questionably entitled, to which my response is if we had a more equitable social support network they wouldn’t need to ‘work the system’, and no, I’m not interested in the debate about what that means, please and thank you.)

I don’t want Trump et al to do this to veterans and their families, but I have to admit a perverse desire to see them try because there is no way they are going to be able to blame this on Biden, or Harris, or Nancy Pelosi, or whomever. I want this to go before Congress and GOP members of the House and then the Senate have to vote nearly en bloc to agree to disestablish these agencies and departments, and answer to why they would do such a thing or else get into a tête-à-tête conflict with Trump’s Cavalcade of Cosmic Creeps. And I kind of want one or two Republican senators to dissent so that Susan Collins is actually forced to stand for something for once or otherwise answer for her complete lack of spine.

Stranger

While these cuts are obviously morally repugnant in terms of the vulnerable populations they would target, they don’t even make sense from the “rational efficiency” perspective that these capitalist outsiders are supposedly bringing to government. Congress hasn’t failed to reauthorize these programs because the programs are useless or inefficient – it’s because Congress couldn’t get their shit together. And Congress does de facto authorize these programs every year by continuing to fund them.

This is a middle school civics student’s version of rationalizing government.

Neither one of your links allow viewing the article you cited without subscription for me.

Could you please list the “10 programs that could be on the ‘government efficiency’ chopping block”?

The article quotes this free source from the congressional budget office…

Don’t they actually recruit using “All these benefits” as a major draw? Pure bait and switch to pull the benefits now.

I seem to remember a case where a veteran or retiree sued the government and lost because none of what he was suing about was guaranteed. I think the subject of his suit was healthcare.

Evidently all is not well in Anti-Camelot. (The link goes to Yahoo.)

Trump Rethinking Treasury Pick After Finalist Annoys Him: Report

Read the article. It’s a roller coaster ride. But the key thing to note here is: Don’t piss off the king.

It’s an uncomfortable place to be, hoping that Trump’s ego-driven pettiness, mercurial temper, and general stupidity will be what saves the US from a worst case scenario, but here we are.

Part of me wants all this to be a disaster, in the hopes that the MAGA dipshits will finally see the incompetence and spite. Face leopards and all that.

Unfortunately, the other part of me knows that no matter how bold and direct the line between Trump and failure is, they’ll blame Obama and Soros.

Trump’s pick to head the FCC, apparently, intends to use the Twitter/X/Fox News/OANN/Newsmax model across all media outlets:

What could possibly go wrong?