Government can’t legitimately hold property any more than the mafia can.
Besides that though, there are countless hackers all over the world, but yet they spend so much energy getting the one who hasn’t stolen anything from anyone. Poor priorities at the very least.
Legitimacy is defined by society, not you, and society has decided government can legitimately hold property. But that aside, you didn’t explain your enigmatic answer. Is “non-authoritarian” law enforcement only possible when it includes physical trespassing? Seems to be what you said.
From link: “A Quinnipiac poll of Democrats likely to seek the 2020 presidential nomination found Gabbard was the choice of less than 1% of voters surveyed.”
Why not? Does the name Piyush “Bobby” Jindal ring a bell? Born and raise a Hindu, convert to Catholicism. Though he’s still Indian and plenty of good old boys would and still see him as a Hindu. He’s a GOP politician. First Indian American governor of Louisiana for 8 years. Also a congressman.
"She announced for Congress in May 2011. By the end of 2011 and the beginning of 2012, she was developing strong, strong ties — before she’d won the primary — to Hindutva organizations based in the U.S. which are the U.S. chapters of organizations back in India. This was before Modi came to power and before the BJP, his political party, came to power. It was while they were mobilizing, trying to get him into power in 2014. These organizations found Gabbard, and they latched on to her, and they identified Gabbard as somebody that could be used as a figurehead to help advance their agenda of whitewashing Narendra Modi and his record and whitewashing the BJP and its supremacist agenda of Hindutva. And they did that…
‘This is just the tip of the iceberg. There’s a lot more beneath the surface. The RSS and its Hindutva affiliates are the KKK of India. Gabbard has spent the past six years serving as America’s handmaiden of Hindutva. She not only empowers India’s religious extremists, but she’s a danger to the entire free world.’"
I just surfed this thread because I have been bingeing on you tube vids to day. And I had Tulsi Gabbard ads pop up 4 times, so I did a search here to see what the community thinks.
I’m well to the left of most members here, and I like many of her views. That being said, I don’t think I can overlook her previous anti-gay activism, particularly given that she’s an older Millennial/young GenX. I don’t even see any lip service towards the LGBT community on her campaign website. She’s near the bottom of my list for that alone.
Gabbard throws the Democrats under the bus. “I think it’s fair. I don’t — I don’t support open borders,” Gabbard answered. “Without secure borders, we don’t really have a country. And while some of the other Democratic candidates will say, ‘Well, that’s a conservative argument and that’s not really what’s being advocated for.’ If you look at the practical implications of some of the things they’re pushing for, it is essentially open borders.”
None of them. But Republicans will come along soon to misstate their positions to make it appear that they have, or that that’s what they really want, and people will fall for it.
It says “Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii[…] has become a favorite of the sites Moscow used when it interfered in 2016.” Sputnik and RT giving her more time than anyone else.
And “The language used to laud Gabbard is reminiscent of Russian media promotion of Jill Stein, the U.S. Green Party candidate for president in 2012 and 2016. Stein received favorable coverage from the same outlets and also benefited from Russian troll accounts.”