After breaking from the Democratic Party in 2022, although she had been moving that direction for a while already, Gabbard was an independent. Now she is officially a Republican. The funny thing in that she has made these decisions claiming the Democratic Party was racist and not accepting of dissenting views. I have a lot of issues with the Democratic Party but I never have thought that Democratic leadership were racist and the Republican Party is the one that tells me if I am pro-choice, pro-public schools, believe not everyone is their birth/genitalia gender, support EV cars, &c. that I’m not a real Republican.
She did get something out of it be being co-chair of Mr. Trump’s 2024 transition team. My questions are: was she a DINO just so she could be elected to public office in Hawaii? What is here future now as an admitted MAGA? Do Hawaiians see this as a betrayal? They saw this all along? Or they don’t care since she’s out of office? Lastly, by waiting until now, did she blow her chance to be Trump’s running mate or was that never in the cards?
In general, I’d say that she is and always has been a true crazy person. There have always been plenty of crazy people among the left - hippies, commies, etc. - and, in general, that’s the traditional native home of crazies. There wasn’t much room for them on the right outside of some gun nuts.
The parties have swapped sides on worker protectionism, abortion rights, scientific backing, etc. There’s really nothing to be surprised about that as the Democratic party becomes Lincoln, Teddy, Ike, and Reagan’s Republican party, the crazies move the opposite direction.
For the record, I did not tag this thread with “trump” and I don’t know who did. Although the topic is tangentally related to Donald Trump, I wanted this thread to be about Gabbard and not yet another “rant against Trump”. God knows we have more than enough of those already. With that in mind, could a mod remove that before this goes off the rails?
Not a mod and I didn’t mention Trump but, it should be pointed out, your OP does mention El Cthulhu Naranja so that seems like a poor way to avoid him.
Not trying to avoid him necessarily since he does enter to the discussion. What I am trying to avoid is the thread turning into a series of anti-Trump rants completely missing the OP.
Not in the primaries IF she were a DINO. But that my be part of the bigger question, why are incumbents almost always 100% in winning primaries/generals even if they don’t represent their constituents?
Not asking why she won against the Republican candidate; asking why she won the Democratic primary.
What did Democrats, the solid majority of voters in Hawaii, see in her in the first place? Had she presented herself as not batshit successfully then? If so was it only when she tried to get a national presence that she focused on the insane vote?
The party will miss her as much as I miss a zit on my butt that I popped in high school. Maybe now she’ll make a couple White House runs as a Republican and be the first totally irrelevant person to run in two parties.