My initial take is that he’s trying to string together elements of somewhat common links to form a coherent story, but I have to disagree with him in that there are different factors driving different elements to the ‘war’ that he is propositioning.
I’d have to read it more in depth and take some notes, but it’s a bit late now, and I think I can certifiably put facts against it. . .
Tripler
He’s just got a different point of view, that’s all.