I endorse this post, and this mirrors pretty much what I was going to reply. So instead let me put it a slightly different way.
Trump’s first term was an unmitigated disaster that seriously undermined the confidence that nations were willing to place in US foreign policy, and undermined America’s prestige and diplomatic “soft power” in the world. It literally killed thousands if not hundreds of thousands of Americans due to gross mismanagement of the COVID pandemic – actual human beings who would be alive today if Trump had not been elected.
The only reason – the only reason – that Trump’s first term wasn’t much, much worse was that so much damage was mitigated by his gross incompetence: he was completely incapable of doing the horrible things he wanted to do because he was an idiot, and also concerned with being re-elected. The only real “accomplishment” he had was just rubber-stamping the Supreme Court appointments favoured by far-right extremists like the Federalist Society, acting as their hapless puppet, and the consequences of that are something that America will have to live with for generations.
But Trump’s second term, if it comes about, will be his final term, whether it lasts for just four years or whether he uses his newfound immunity powers to stay in office for life. Either way, it will be a term without any constraints by considerations of ethics, democracy, tradition, political niceties, or anything else. Trump is a deranged lunatic who has explicitly stated that his main priority will be to wage a reign of terror against his perceived enemies. Legal protections for his victims will no longer mean anything as the Supreme Court has already ruled that a president is above the law (at least, if the president is Trump). Trump’s pal Steve Bannon already stated – while being escorted to jail – that everyone responsible for prosecuting him, Trump, or any of Trump’s allies will be pursued to the ends of the earth, and if they try to flee the country will be extradited.
Trump isn’t truly interested in immigration issues one way or the other, nor does he even understand them, but to appease his Nazi acolytes he’ll make attempts to round up innocents and their families and children – people who are in the US legally and working productive jobs – and pull them from their jobs, break up families, and remove them from the US where they have legal safe refuge. (When this failed to work well enough for the Nazis, that’s when the concentration camps went into high gear.)
Just a sampling of Trump’s second term.
This is not a normal election. It’s a national existential crisis.
And that is why we now have Project 2025. The fascist assholes are prepared if Trump gets into office to maximize their power grab and push their agenda. It’s a roadmap, it is public and yet most people think it is somehow just a joke or a lark.
Whether it’s Elmo, Bezos, the Kochs, Peter Thiel (who I still say bears a remarkable resemblance to Joseph Goebbels) there appears to be no end of billionaires willing to sell out their country just to get more and more billions, because no amount of billions is enough. Yay for unrestricted capitalism! MAGA!
This was a gutless, cowardly move by Jeff Bezos, an affront to good journalism and to the legacy of what is still one of America’s great newspapers. I’d cancel my subscription but it runs until July and there are still too many things on the WaPo that I enjoy reading every day.
If it runs to July then they already have the money for the subscription until then. If you cancel you still get to read it till next July. Then it will not renew.
If they give you a refund for the unused months then it may cancel immediately but I’d be shocked if they gave a refund.
Yes, I know. Cancelling is only symbolic…and what good is that? Once you are subscribed, you can still read it until your subscription runs out. We got it at a really cheap introductory rate, then a week before that ended, they reminded me that if I wanted to renew, it would be the full rate. I cancelled, and they immediately gave it to me at the cheap introductory rate again.
That’s fine (and expected). The endorsement hopefully comes with some reasoning from the editorial board of the paper and one would expect some papers will differ. Then we can read their reasons and make our own choices.
I’ll have to lookup the New York Post’s endorsement. I am curious how they rationalize Trump for president.
ETA: I looked up the New York Post’s endorsement. It’s not good at all and can be easily picked apart by anyone who has been paying attention. You’d think an editorial board would do better but…it’s the Post so maybe not.
I didn’t actually have a problem with your initial comment. I mean, I think it’s ill-informed, but you’re entitled to your opinion. And people can point out why you’re wrong.
But posting to make fun of people for being upset? That’s trolling, and puts your sincerity in question.
It’s not. To them. “Them” meaning the plutocrats who control what the media ownership allows them to say.
To slightly paraphrase David Frum (the sort of old-school conservative that you could have intelligent debates with), when the policies of right-wing neo-Nazis cannot bring them to power through the democratic process, they will not abandon their policies; they will abandon democracy.
Lol. Totally not a troll reply! You just have an awesome sense of humor of course! And cleverness! Its the cleverness that stands out so much and puts your contribution into the stratosphere of the wise, rational bystander.
OK so the election of Trump may not lead to the end of the American experiment. The fact that this is even a question make him utterly unqualified to be president. Here have a bottle of strycnine, you seem like a pretty healthy guy I doubt you’ll die. Feel like taking a swig?