The web is public domain? Thanks for the info, Cooks Source magazine!

[Inner_Stickler]

@Derleth

Meh. I’m not on any social media websites, either.

Maybe we can start up a No Social Media Websites social media website. You can join that thing only if you never join those things.

head explodes

[Shot_From_Guns]

@Martini_Enfield

If it makes you feel any better, apparently the general social consensus now is that anyone who isn’t on Friendface* is some sort of antisocial weirdo with no friends. It gets tiring trying to refute it, too.

What the fuck does that have to do with anything? My comment was about the internet in general, not networking sites. I couldn’t give a flying fuck if you’re not not now, have never been, and have no intention to be on MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc. The point is that anybody with an ounce of exposure to the internet should have been able to recognize a massive pileon of hyperbolic mockery without asking, “Gee, is this what those kids call a ‘Googlebomb’?” :rolleyes:

[bdgr]

Facebook is the platform reality now runs on. If it isn’t on facebook, it doesn’t exist.

[Bosstone]

@bdgr

Facebook is the platform reality now runs on. If it isn’t on facebook, it doesn’t exist.

Wait, really? Oh sh

[Swallowed_My_Cellphone]

@The_Hamster_King

“Don’t cry, Ceiling Cat doesn’t judge.” made me lol.

That and the “…articles on kaiser, yogurt and crepes…” matched up so perfectly, I started choking on my tea.

However: Cooks Source can not vouch for all the writers we have used in the past, and in the future can only check to a certain extent. Therefore, we will no longer accept unrequested articles, nor will we work with writers or illustrators unless they can prove they are reputable people, provide their sources, and who, in our estimation, we feel our readers and advertisers can trust and rely on for accuracy and originality

Oh, come on! They are trying to pass the buck and say “freelance writers submitted copyrightedd stuff without our knowledge!”

[Peremensoe]

It sounds like the Cooks Source people imagine the publication still has a future.

[bup]

See, those lousy hackers turned their advertisers away from them.

Oh, you fucking hackers.

[Derleth]

@bup

See, those lousy hackers turned their advertisers away from them.

Oh, you fucking hackers.

Hey, it’s more fun than blowing up trucks.

[Martini_Enfield]

@Shot_From_Guns

What the fuck does that have to do with anything? My comment was about the internet in general, not networking sites. I couldn’t give a flying fuck if you’re not not now, have never been, and have no intention to be on MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc. The point is that anybody with an ounce of exposure to the internet should have been able to recognize a massive pileon of hyperbolic mockery without asking, “Gee, is this what those kids call a ‘Googlebomb’?” :rolleyes:

It has to do with someone snarking someone else who basically didn’t get a joke largely happening on Facebook and asked where the humour was in the situation, and if it was some sort of thing which happens on Facebook only or was part of a larger trend.

[MsWhatsit]

@Martini_Enfield

It has to do with someone snarking someone else who basically didn’t get a joke

The rest of your statement is irrelevant. It has nothing to do with assuming that everyone should be on Facebook or whatever. The venue of the joke has nothing to do with the humor. The snark was about someone not getting what was pretty obviously a joke; nothing more, nothing less.

[Martini_Enfield]

@MsWhatsit

The rest of your statement is irrelevant. It has nothing to do with assuming that everyone should be on Facebook or whatever. The venue of the joke has nothing to do with the humor. The snark was about someone not getting what was pretty obviously a joke; nothing more, nothing less.

Regardless of that, there’s no need for the unnecessarily hostile “DURRR You’re THICK” responses, especially to someone who’s (at least from what I can tell) generally fairly well thought of on the boards.

And the venue of the joke does matter. The SDMB is full of “jokes” that make no sense out of context; you might think it hilarious I if snuck a “Once, For Twenty Minutes, in 1960” joke into an article I was writing, but the rest of the readers would be thinking “WTF??? ”

[Snowboarder_Bo]

@Martini_Enfield

Regardless of that, there’s no need for the unnecessarily hostile “DURRR You’re THICK” responses, especially to someone who’s (at least from what I can tell) generally fairly well thought of on the boards.

And the venue of the joke does matter. The SDMB is full of “jokes” that make no sense out of context; you might think it hilarious I if snuck a “Once, For Twenty Minutes, in 1960” joke into an article I was writing, but the rest of the readers would be thinking “WTF??? ”

They’d get that the phrase was funny, tho. Except the exceptionally dim people. They’d be posting on message boards asking if it was a joke, then being butthurt that they didn’t get it.

[Shot_From_Guns]

@Martini_Enfield

Regardless of that, there’s no need for the unnecessarily hostile “DURRR You’re THICK” responses

There was a need for it because that was how I wanted to respond to it, and the question was asked in a forum where I have no need to censor myself when people ask stupid questions. End of discussion. If your reaction to mild snark is ever “Why are you so meeeeeeeeean? :(:(:(” you need to go the fuck back to MSPIMS.

[YogSothoth]

I, for one, love this. Rest assured that as soon as I heard about this controversy, I went over to the page and posted some shit on it.

[Sleeps_With_Butterflies]

@MsWhatsit

The snark was about someone not getting what was pretty obviously a joke; nothing more, nothing less.

I don’t see how anyone can read what Una originally said in post #83 and come away with this conclusion.

The question (to me) seemed to be whether or not this was some kind of established meme (on FB or some other place) or an effort to be funny to flood the search engines or just plain old stupidity. I don’t think that Una didn’t get it was a “joke”* only that she didn’t understand the intent (as in more than just being funny) or origin.

For the record, I like Shot From Guns quite a bit. She’s one of my favorite posters here, but I thought her every reaction to Una here has been over-the-top and really disproportionate to all of Una’s comments in this thread.

*I put joke in quotes because if that’s the kind of shit that passes for funny I’m starting to understand how there are people out there who laugh at people Jeff Dunham and Gallagher.

[LouisB]

@Derleth

Meh. I’m not on any social media websites, either.

Maybe we can start up a No Social Media Websites social media website. You can join that thing only if you never join those things.

How much does it cost and to where do I send the check? Assuming you accept my application, of course.

[Czarcasm]

@LouisB

How much does it cost and to where do I send the check? Assuming you accept my application, of course.

Just send the check. If you don’t hear back you’ll know you were accepted.

[Projammer]

Looks like they’ve updated their site again with some mediocre apologies and half assed excuses.

I was stupid to even answer her that night, her email to me was antagonistic and just plain rude and I was exhausted. But I got suckered in and responded. She doesnt say that she was rude, she doesnt say that I agreed (and did) to pay her. It was my plan to contact her after deadline and have a good discussion about it.

OMG! I stole from her and she was mean to me!

But one night when working yet another 12 hour day late into the night, I was short one article… Instead of picking up one of the multitude of books sent to me and typing it, I got lazy and went to the www and “found” something. Bleary-eyed I didnt notice it was copy written and reordered some of it. I did keep the author’s name on it rather than outright “stealing” it, and it was my intention to contact the author, but I simply forgot, between proofreading, deliveries, exhaustion.

It was an accident. It really was! So were the 166(currently) others on the Google Docs Spreadsheet. I’m really not a bad person!

The bad news is that this is probably the final straw for Cooks Source. We have never been a great money-maker even with all the good we do for businesses. Having a black mark wont help…and now, our black mark will become our shroud.

I’ll be leaving the country now before all the corporate lawyers can catch up with me.

The internetz is all a bunch of meanies.

[Projammer]

ETA: quotes copied without permission. The internet is all public domain anyways.

[Labrador_Deceiver]

@Projammer

Looks like they’ve updated their site again with some mediocre apologies and half assed excuses. OMG! I stole from her and she was mean to me!
It was an accident. It really was! So were the 166(currently) others on the Google Docs Spreadsheet. I’m really not a bad person!
I’ll be leaving the country now before all the corporate lawyers can catch up with me.

The internetz is all a bunch of meanies.

It is astounding how clueless this woman is.