Not exactly plagiarism, but this story deals with an idea possibly being lifted from my writing - or not, who knows?
I’ve been a comic book fan for over half a century now. Back in the 1980s, I didn’t care for the direction the industry was going in. Rather than telling stories in individual comics magazines, as they always had, the stories were being stretched out over multiple issues and subsequently collected into trade paperback volumes - much as is still being done today. Back then, it was a fairly new innovation, though. Continued stories had been common since the 1960s, but the idea of story arcs and later collections is what was new. And I didn’t care for it. I missed - and still miss - the days when you could buy a used comic book at a bookstore or thrift store and be pretty sure that you would get a whole story in the book (or possibly more than one, but they would be complete stories with beginnings, middles and ends). It seemed to me that the comics companies were taking advantage of their readers by, in effect, trying to sell them the same story twice. Also, it seemed to me at the time that there had come to be a new emphasis on fancy, pin-up style artwork with a corresponding de-emphasis on telling good stories, which I also disliked.
Anyway, at some point I became concerned enough about the trends to write a letter to the editors of the weekly newspaper, Comics Buyers’ Guide, which, at the time, was probably the primary source of news and information for comics fans. The letter was published, the editors responded, and that was that. I had had my say. But in my screed objecting to the new practice of releasing stories in multiple parts in the comics magazines only to later release the same stories complete in single volumes, I said something like the following: “It seems to me that if the writers and artists want to tell a story that will eventually be released as a book, then they ought to skip the magazine serialization and just release it as a book in the first place. After all, when Stephen King writes a new novel, he doesn’t release it in several parts first, and then later as a whole book in one volume.”
Now I knew that Stephen King read CBG; he had even had letters published in it himself from time to time.
And, about a year, maybe a little more, after my letter was published, Stephen King released the novel, The Green Mile. In six parts, at first, then later in a single volume.
I don’t *know *that he got the idea from me, but I’ve certainly wondered about it all these decades.