Careful there - you certainly **can **get pregnant from anal sex. It’s much less likely, but semen from the leaking santorum can and does enter the vaginal canal on occasion. One of my friends, a sweet Christian girl who was “saving herself” enjoyed frequent and raucous anal sex with her boyfriend for the very reason stated in the OP. Result? Matthew Joseph. Cute kid. Shotgun wedding. 18 years old. (The groom was 43 and a Grade-A jerk. It was quite the scandal.)
Y’know, I was going to have breakfast…
Where’s that vomit smilie?
I think Catharine Maria Sedgwick’s definition of a “puritan” applies here: Someone who insists that good be done, even if evil ensue.
I have to call you out on your so-called “facts” here. You’re wallowing in illogic. Think about it: If teenagers have sex for thousands of years, then they’re not going to be teenagers anymore, right? Instead they’ll be really really old people having sex. [Lady’s Man]OK, that’s digustin’[/Lady’s Man].
Anyway, learned years ago that if you want to have hot monkey sex of the most perverted and satisfying nature, seek out Catholic girls. Fastest growing religion in the world, dude!
I haveto assume that the abstinence only crowd is motivated by religeous beliefs. So what part of the Bible is the readon for the belief that there shouldn’t be any humping before marriage?
To put is less succinctly then, my point was that there might be a “Law of Unintended Consequences” effect from all that abstinence-only stuff, and to show how a hypothetical degenerate would find it appealing.
That good enough for ya? 
Ah, the “hypothetical degenerate”… I have this “friend”, see… nudge nudge
Just joshin’ with you, Evil. Actually making fun of this board’s hypersensitivity toward references to underage sex (which, given what little I can glean of some recent bizarre happenings, is actually understandable).
Hey! Better that evil should ensue rather than penis…
Well, if good be done and penis ensue… win win!
My province is in the process of reforming sex education. The number of parents (and other “concerned citizens”) that are completely hysterical just blows my mind.
“Oh my gawd, they’re going to tell kids about orgasms and masturbation and oral sex. They have the nerve to mention pleasure. They have no right to teach the children that such things exist. It’s wrong wrong wrong!”
Here’s a link to some of the uniformed.
That should read uninformed. Bwahahahaha :smack:
Cyros, do you find that there is a kind of visceral reaction in parents against the idea that their kids are sexual beings?
My kids are stepkids, and maybe that makes a difference, but my mate is very cool about this and we both agree that they are all going to understand what sex is and not get freaked out about it.
We accept the fact that the little ones are going to engage in “sex play” of some sort somewhere along the line, and that the older ones already have. We understand that masturbation becomes part of their lives at puberty, and though it’s not something we chat about over breakfast, we make decisions regarding room assignments and privacy rules accordingly.
Personally, I don’t see how anyone can expect their kids to stay safe in this world if they don’t know what’s what from a very young age. The way we see it, kids need to understand something about sex before they hit puberty, and they have to feel as comfortable as possible talking about it with us – or at least one of us – when they need to.
This is not a value I inherited. I come from a hugely dysfunctional family, and much of that dysfunction revolved around sex. It was a don’t-ask-don’t-tell household, as were the households my parents came from. I’m determined that my kids not go through the same thing I did.
But I don’t really understand where these attitudes come from. (My dad lives with us, and I still don’t dare broach the subject with him – there’d be no point.) If you care to elaborate, either here or in another thread, I’d be interested.
As for STDs, I remember coming across some military material talking about what soldiers should do if they contracted a venereal disease. We’re lucky that antibiotics had come into widespread use by WWII, or else I imagine quite a few more men would’ve brought clap back to their sweethearts.
Presumably these translate as internet (“e”) sex, dubious (“sus”) sex and vaginal sex?