The world's worst comic strips.

I’ll step up to defend Rose is Rose, I’ve seriously loved that strip on several occasions. Sure, it can get a bit syrupy sweet and unrealistic (actually, the entire strip is surreal) at times, but it almost always gets me to smile, especially the cat.

Family Circus is just plain awful, is it only reprinted because of longetivity?

I also am sick of Baby Blues, but not as much… Seems to replay the same jokes over and over, and degrade into stereotypes a bit too much for my liking.

Dennis the Menace needs to be put down. Now. The jokes are like some sort of depraved Mad Libs, where the creator inserts different words in the same gag for… gasp THE SAME EFFECT!

My paper only gets the Sunday version of Mark Trail, but from what I’ve seen, the strip is actually pretty cool. Taught me a thing or two many a time.

Strips I LIKE right now are Grand Avenue (suprising too, I thought it’d be dumb), Foxtrot (though I think it’s gone down a bit after reading the books), and Safe Havens, another strip that allows the characters to age.

Since several folks have mentioned The Dysfunctional Family Circus, here’s a link to the archive. Enjoy.

I stopped reading the comics when I started reading the news online, although I will still go to ucomics.com to catch up on Mr. Boffo. I remember when Mallard Filmore first came out I was willing to give it a chance in the interest of fairness (and because the artist had done some rather funny work in National Lampoon), up until his brilliant satire of public education, which consisted of a kid’s note from his teacher that contained about 5 misspellings per word. Gee, how can you argue with biting wit like that? :rolleyes:

–sublight.

The absolute worst is definitely Nancy. That strip should be retired and sent to the knackers’ NOW. I’m glad the Toronto Star no longer carries it.

And Garfield? I remember when it was funny; I used to cut them out and paste them in my sketchbooks. But then I remember that that was twenty years ago! Enough, already!!!

I second the vote on those older comics that have been around too long. Yes, I miss Bloom County, the Far Side and Calvin and Hobbes a lot, but I’m glad that their artists were wise enough to stop before the strips entered their senility.

And BC? I haven’t seen it for a long time. I remember that the books from the seventies were often quite funny.

OTOH, I like Zits. I love how the characters in For Better Or For Worse actually live lives, develop, and age. And I think that Sherman’s Lagoon has moments of genius.

I wonder whether the Toronto Star would bring back Robotman. Although I haven’t read much of it lately, and I wonder whether it is starting to show signs of senility.

Sunspace, Robotman is now Monty Robotman got in a spacecraft, I forget why or where he was going, and now Monty has a different sidekick. I don’t read it any more.

**

Nitpick: Farley didn’t drown; his heart gave out.

Tzel, the bong was seen in the first or second year of Fox Trot. Paige and her friend Nicole go to a seniors’ party. The host asks Paige if she wants a bong hit, then, when she declines, takes one himself. “[gurgle gurgle gurgle] Whoa! Almost tossed my cookies there! SURE you don’t want a hit?”

Y’know, despite the rut it’s hit as far as subject matter goes, Garfield will always have a special place in my heart, if only because of the leaf weasels…

(No, I won’t explain. <g>)

Oh, and despite one poster’s complaint about how Dilbert isn’t even remotely realistic, I’m continually amazed at the people who say it is… It always scares me. It really does.

Sunspace:

Complete agreement. My favorite recent one: Sherman’s wife makes him cook dinner for a week. The first night, she asks him what he made, and he tells her “Shake ‘n’ Bake.” She asks, pork? chicken? He uncovers the serving tray to reveal a smoldering box of “Shake ‘n’ Bake.” She asks, incredulously, “You just baked the box?”

He responds: “Duh, I shook it first.”

They wrote Robotman out, replaced him with a human-alien hybrid being named (well, numbered) “Pi” (Monty introduces him to Moondog, saying “They call him Pi for short.” Moondog asks what it’s short for. He says, “3.14159…”…the aliens gave him an irrational number due to his half-human heritage) and re-named it “Monty.” I still like it, but I liked it better a year or two ago (I wish to heck they’d print a collection that includes the Patrick Stewart strips.) You can judge for yourself at this web site.

Two new ones that have appeared recently in my paper that need a size 12 boot to the ass…

Helen, Sweetheart of the Internet. I only hope she meets the same fate as every other dot.com.

And Mr. Potato Head, drawn by the same guy as Garfield (which clearly I’m on my own for still liking). Yeah, maybe when voiced by Don Rickles he’s funny, but as a comic strip it blows chunks.

You know, seeing this thread again makes me wonder if we could use this collected information to create the worst-possible-comic-strip-even-in-theory.

Of course, you can’t make it the worst right off the bat- you have to keep it going for a few years after it (immediately) goes stale, so that it’s abundantly clear that you’re beating the dead one-trick pony. Maybe eventually switch to a born-again theme too, like B.C. (I have nothing against Christian artists, like Michaelangelo. But I do have a thing against fundamentalist glurgists.)

I think I’d start with the glurge-factor of “Gamin and Patches” and “Family Circus” (“Love Is”, anyone? Come to think of it, the only thing more horrifying than two naked, genital-less married six-year-olds is… well, think of it this way. “Love is… stretching your arms out this wide.” (Hazy picture of a cross in the background, beneath which the uncanny couple hold hands and gaze into the distance.) Pray you die before it happens!) Then somehow combine that with the grating-main-character factor of some of the other strips, like “The Lockhorns.” You’d have to make it go really slow, like Apt. 4G and Mary Worth. I’m thinking of a narrative strip where in a typical story arc the grumpy old bastard- call him Mr. Grundy- meets a cancerous waif and is slooooowly glurged into momentary enlightenment as the story unfolds over several weeks, with each day’s strip containing at most one new frame of information. It would end with the G.O.B. having his heart melted, only to start the next day with a “new” story arc in which he’s a crusty jerk once again. (“New” in the at most purely ironic sense of “a new Marmaduke comic,” for example.) Oh yeah, and the waif talks with a cutesy speech impediment. “Mista Gwundy?” No comic strip can truly meet its potential for horror without a speech impediment.

Of course, once we enter the born-again phase, you have to mix in the militant unfunniness of Mallard Fillmore in his “too angry to think of a joke today” mode. (We can’t include it in the early phase, because then there would be no point at which the reader could say, “Man, when this started out I had no idea it could get so much worse!”) Maybe we could include B.C.'s occasional clueless offensiveness, too.

And, best of all, we’d take a cue from Chicken Soup for the ________ Soul and not even create original story ideas- instead, we’d take overly recirculated glurge emails which all our readership has already seen, possibly even seen against their will, and just find a way to insert Mr. Grundy as a character, if only as a completely redundant spectator.

In the final (possibly senile) phase of the comic, the homogeneity of the glurge source material and the inexorably slow pace of the narrative will combine until the narrative simply gurgles to a complete stop. (We would, of course, have to jettison the militancy and the occasional offensiveness, in order to make the terrain as unremarkable and featureless as possible.) No one can remember what happened two days ago, no one knows where the narrative is going, and no one really notices, because the comic is so undemanding and totally devoid of anything but vaguely emotive content that you don’t need any sort of direction. A formless, homogeneous mush, like white bread soaked in warm milk- and yet, on some subconscious level, a Philip K. Dickian psychological labyrinth from which there can be no escape. You might have a vague feeling that something is amiss, but you’d chalk it up to the fact that the strip never makes much impression on you, so you just don’t remember what events led up to the current situation. (Can you remember the last Marmaduke you read? The last Family Circus? I have a vague memory of reading it the last time I looked at a paper… was it the one where Marmaduke sits on the guy in the armchair? Or was that the Marmaduke parody I read? Was yesterday’s comic the one with Jeffy eating a cookie he wasn’t supposed to eat? Or was that the one from last week?) Even if you collected the last several months worth of “Mr. Grundy” and laid them out in front of you, you wouldn’t quite be able to figure it out. The repetitious nature of the comic, with each week reviewing the last two panels of the week before, with each new frame only adding a miniscule amount of information about the plot, and with so little actual plot to describe, all would combine to make it difficult even to tease out a concise plot summary, or even to stay focussed long enough to decide whether there’s any plot at all.

Admit it- can’t you see it happening? Can you honestly say that it hasn’t happened already, and you just haven’t noticed yet?

-Ben

You forgot the ugly art that looks like it was drawn by a blind man working while on a tilt-o-whirl.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by DKW *

**Get Fuzzy - Oh, here’s great idea: Take one of the WORST cartoon developments ever, i.e. centering everything around the most obnoxious, irritating, self-centered waste of flesh in the cast and let him (always a him) get away with murder, and build a comic strip around it.

Mallard Fillmore - Far too little substance for a strip that’s supposed to have political viewpoints. Pointing fingers and laughing does not constitute sound analysis (or even humor, for that matter).**

Thank God somebody feels the same way I do about Get Fuzzy! It has to be one of the most insipid, unfunny comic strips of all time. And it’s not even humorous, to boot!

I agree with you about Mallard Fillmore, too…my feeling is that it’s all well and good to express a political viewpoint, but there has to be more substance to it, or else it belongs on the editorial page. Besides, Mallard gets to be a bit, ah, boring after awhile.

As for other strips…despite lame jokes and tired material, I’m always going to read Garfield, Hagar The Horrible, and Blondie. I adore Curtis, even if it sometimes comes off as a bit “sit-comy”. And kudos to Lynn Johnson for aging her characters in FBOFW – I mean, what other comic strip does that? Foxtrot, I’ll admit, gets tiresome after awhile, as does Cathy. Sally Forth and Rose Is Rose, on the other hand…c’mon, at least give their creators credit for focusing in on two viewpoints of modern women today. Plus, I love Pasquale’s guardian angel!

…and has anyone noticed in reading “Classic Peanuts” that it actually was a somewhat depressing strip back in its early days?

Gasoline Alley. That’s what made it stand out from other strips, way back in its heyday.

What’s the name of that unfunny comic strip about a bunch of pirates, one of them named Seahawk? I was never even remotely amused by that one.

Overboard.

That’s it! Thanks.

Uproariously unfunny.

Blasphemer.

BTW, my favorite comic strip of all time was Cathy’s Sunday tribute to Charles Schulz’s last strip. I have a copy of it in my scrapbook, and I practically bawled like a baby over that one.

Blasphemer!!! Ernie Pook is the single greatest comic ever!

I also can’t believe anyone dislikes Zippy the Pinnhead, but to each there own.

The only true evil on the comics page is B.C., unfunny and offensive.

The Dinette Set is about these old fogies who, compare prices of stamps, try and defraud retail stores, recycle teabags, drop pennies in trick-or-treat bags, sneer at everyone who does not live in Crustwood, and just have pointless, mean-spirited, little lives.

**

I think the reason why most people dislike Zippy is because they don’t understand where he’s coming from. Sometimes I don’t either, but overall it’s the only comic strip which makes me think.

Those dirty cartoons people pass around at the office and even send over the fax.

Fred Basset, Fred Basset, Fred Basset!!! Without a doubt, for me, the absolute most unfunny comic I have ever read. Part of my daily routine used to be leafing through the Tribune to read that pathetic comic, in the hopes that one day I would find a Fred Basset strip that would make me chuckle. It never happened. It’s always that f@$%ing lazy-ass SOB of a dog stating the painfully obvious. It’s a crime that the artist actually got paid to draw that crap.
ARGHHH!!!

Oh yeah, just to provide an example of stating the painfully un-funny obvious, look here.

“Wretched gnats.” … “They seem to like him.”

That’s a frickin’ punchline? It’s a lot more fun filling in your own punchline. Like, for this one, “Son of a bitch deserves it” or “Maybe he should stop rolling around in his own shit” or “Um, those are locusts…hide that first born of yours” or something like that.