David Brent? Naive? That hero of modern management technique? Pshaw.
To quote the great man,
“Does a struggling salesman start turning up on a bicycle? No, he turns up in a newer car - perception, yeah? They got to trust me - I’m taking these guys into battle, yeah? And I’m doing my own stapling.”
Gary - we don’t all get to be our own boss you know. At least - not yet.
pan
But Pan, for every strong gut there is at least one turd.
Ho ho. I like that one.
Kabbes! Where have you beeeeeeeeeeen? Don’t go away again, we missed you!
Yes, I too would like to kill a fatted calf to mark the return of the prodigal Kab. I remember your former company troubles, but you saved yourself due to professional brilliance. What happened next?
[…arms akimbo… …disgruntled stare…]
Hey! No fair! We’ve been here all this time and you haven’t killed a fatted calf for us!
Maybe I missed where the OP indicated why it was not an option to BYOB…there was nothing, as I remember it, in the OP about there being, other than the bar being open for an hour, no option for alcohol.
[sub]Let’s see if this second post of mine on this very subject in this very thread, combined with Steve Wright’s post, gets any attention…[/sub]
Sisemi’s not an employee. She could stay away.
What difference does that make? People still use cocaine and serve it at parties; it’s still a norm.
But Sesimi’s the one complaining
I really don’t have to bring up the obviouse cliched examples to demonstate why “legally and historically acceptable” isn’t a valid argument, do I? Besides, I only have this “fucked attitude” because Sisemi had to gall to suggest that the temperant woman was cramming her lifestyle down people’s throat when macrocomically its exactly the other way around, and I know you know this as a non-drinker yourself.
Really? It’s a choice? Then why am I confronted with an obligitory drink requirement when entering clubs? And…Sorry, can’t finish post cause Internet Train is closing.
Aw, thanks for the big wb guys. I luvs yas all.
The last “business-sponsered” party I went to was the 30 June shin-dig for a national law firm. Wine, beer and spirits were provided, not to mention alcoholic jelly shots. Despite the place being crammed to the rafters with lawyers, the firm obviously had no liability concerns about their guests drinking. This isn’t mention Friday night drinks on the firm’s account, a custom which is damn near universal for city firms in this country.
I must concede, however, that this may be a practice since vanished in the US. OTOH, Gary Kumquat would indicate that it is not. Any other US dopers who work for corporations or big firms want to weigh in here? (Sorry to get all GQ on you. :))
**Libertarian:
**Wow, your rilly good at spotting typos! :rolleyes:
Pizzabrat, truly you are a fucking idiot if you think serving cocaine and serving alcohol at a party are comparable issues.
I’d also like some description of how people drinking at the same venue as you are “cramming [a] lifestyle down people’s throat” unless they’re somehow forcing you to drink too.
I’m starting to understand though just why people within earshot of you might need a stiff drink though.
Oh, and as everyone seems to be ignoring Steve and iampunha’s byo suggestion - it wouldn’t really be the done thing, would it. Any employer who’s so keen on keeping his wife happy could take a real dim view of employees swigging out of a hip flask.
Huh. First they came for the drink. Then they came for the cocaine. Next you’ll be telling me that your company won’t be providing any whores.
pan
What do you think I’m running here, the royal family?
“What are you drinking? What is that? Huh!?! Just water? Why? Why just water? Why aren’t you drinking? You don’t drink? Oh, why? Are you a muslim? No? Then why? Are you really religious, or something? No? Oh. Have you never, ever drank in your life? Really? Well, just try my drink. You sure? Come on, just a sip. Just sip it, for me. Please? Come on! Fine!.” Repeat 30x a night.
Clearly, pizzatwat, you have had a bad experience with drinkers. That’s sad. But you are a plonker if you consider that all of us are like that.
Maybe they just dislike you and are trying to wind you up?
Gary, your hypothesis has legs.
pizzatedium - I don’t suppose by any chance you find that people are rude to you in other areas of your life too do you?
pan
I’ve experienced what pizzabrat has, though I suspect he/she/it was employing some hyperbole. Something about a person drinking soft drinks when there’s alcohol avaiable makes some drinkers crazy–see my previous post on the hubby’s company X-mas party. I supposed that they mean well, but, you know, that whole decreased inhibitions / diminished mental capacity thing . . . Of course it’s not all drinkers, but it only takes one or two people who have decided that it is their personal mission in life to get you drunk to be really freakin’ annoying.
I don’t agree that this means having to go with a party with alcohol is having that lifestyle shoved on you. While it sometimes seems that “there’s one in every crowd,” that’s why we had to sit through all those bad movies in health class in high school where you learn how to say no to drugs and alcohol.
Of course, neither do I think that being forced to go to a party without alcohol constitutes having that lifestyle shoved on you . . . I think it’s either both or neither, right? Can’t say that being forced to go without drink for a few hours means you’re subjected to an unwanted intrusion of the teetotaler lifestyle while a non-drinker isn’t being imposed upon by being forced to hang out with drunks for a few hours.
In the end, it’s a few hours. I don’t particularly like my husband’s co-workers. We have nothing in common and they actually don’t seem very nice, and I get the feeling that they find me to be a brainiac freak, so, happily it’s all mutual. So alcohol aside, I’d prefer not to go the party. Does that mean that they’re imposing their sports-watching, cosmetics - comparing, talking - about - the - last - time - they - got - so - drunk - they - puked lifestyle on me?
I’m confused. Are you going to the same party as Siemsi? Are you Siemsi’s boss’s wife? Or is Podkayne your husband and you logged in under his name?
Given that you’d prefer not to go to the party, is it not fair to suggest that you’d be better off shitfaced while you’re there?
See - that’s my point. And, frankly, I think it’s a damn good one 
pan