QUOTE=Bryan Ekers;11219567]Shouldn’t “Awareness” be factored in?
[/QUOTE]
true ,if the equation was correct to stat with …
Albert made one misteak . he rewrote his Special Theory of Relativity 3 times .and knew there was something still wrong with the equation . he just had no way to define what was wrong he had ruled out thomas youngs theory of a real 5th element and based his Special Theory of Relativity on what he knew at the time … young was closer then albert knew to the real answer …
The Special Theory of Relativity
The validity of the classical concepts of absolute and independent time and space was challenged by H. A. Lorentz and others. Since absolute motion cannot be confirmed by objective measurement, Einstein suggested that it be discarded from physical reasoning; he explained the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment by means of the special relativity theory, which he enunciated in 1905. This theory accepts the hypothesis that the laws of nature are the same in different moving systems applies also to the propagation of light, so that the measured speed of light is constant for all observers regardless of the motion of the observer or of the source of the light. Einstein deduced from these hypotheses the full logical consequences and reformulated the mathematical equations of physics, basing them in part on equations of H. A. Lorentz (see Lorentz contraction) by which measurements made in one uniformly moving system can be correlated with measurements in another system if the velocity of one relative to the other is known.
The theory resolves the conflict between Newton’s mechanics and Maxwell’s electrodynamics by introducing fundamental changes in Newton’s theory. In most phenomena of ordinary experience the results obtained from the application of the special theory approximate those based on Newtonian dynamics, but the results deviate greatly for phenomena occurring at velocities approaching the speed of light. In innumerable cases where the results predicted by these theories are incompatible, experimental evidence supports the Einstein theory. Among its assertions and consequences are the propositions that the maximum velocity attainable in the universe is that of light; that mass and energy are equivalent and interchangeable properties (this is spectacularly confirmed by nuclear fission, on which the atomic bomb is based); that objects appear to contract in the direction of motion; that the rate of a moving clock seems to decrease as its velocity increases; that events that appear simultaneous to an observer in one system may not appear simultaneous to an observer in another system; and that, since absolute time is excluded from physical reasoning because it cannot be measured, the results of observers in different systems are equally correct.
The General Theory of Relativity
Einstein expanded the special theory of relativity into a general theory (completed c.1916) that applies to systems in nonuniform (accelerated) motion as well as to systems in uniform motion. The general theory is principally concerned with the large-scale effects of gravitation and therefore is an essential ingredient in theories of the universe as a whole, or cosmology. The theory recognizes the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass. It asserts that material bodies produce curvatures in space-time that form a gravitational field and that the path of a body in the field is determined by this curvature. The geometry of a given region of space and the motion in the field can be predicted from the equations of the general theory.
Details of the motions of the planet Mercury had long puzzled astronomers; Einstein’s computations explained them. He stated that the path of a ray of light is deflected by a gravitational field; observations of starlight passing near the sun, first made by A. S. Eddington during an eclipse of the sun in 1919, confirmed this. He predicted that in a gravitational field spectral lines of substances would be shifted toward the red end of the spectrum. This has been confirmed by observation of light from white dwarf stars. Further confirmation has been obtained in recent years from precision measurements using artificial satellites and the Viking lander on Mars, and from detailed observations of pulsars.
…
few under stand that albert used his own foundmentals as the basic logic for his work . the fact is he did not have all the data at the time to correctly define the real equation for a basic under standing of how matter moves threw space …if he had . we would most likely be reading my equation in his hand writeing …
but few under stand the basic of his Light Quanta and Wave-Particle Duality defind the logic ground work for his Special Theory of Relativity
sad thing is it was correct but not complete when he used it …
the problem is with the (Wave-Particle Duality)
this is where he made his misjudgement . true the Wave-Particles appear to be in Duality but in fact they are in trility…he messured what he could see and under stand . but only judged it by what he knew at the time …who could he have asked at the time . no one knew as much as he did … the fact remains . 3 parts of matter are controlled by there geomathatical atomic structure
what he saw was protons ,and eletrons …and how they pass threw time and space . but the nuetronic particals also do the same thing … if he had noted this his theory would have changed and he could have corrected the misteak …
just because we dont hear or see nuetronic weight dose not mean it has no cause and effects on sound and light particals …
do you under stand what i am saying …
all matter be it ,anti or matter . starts with nuetronic particals . and these particals become the basic wave structure for sound and light . when sound reaches a giiven seed and hermonic it becomes light and excellerates …
this is what albert was trying to under stand …
the values of this prime sequence never change its weight and mass dose . but the values never change …
from the smallest peice of nuetronic matter to the massive reaches of creation . this is the standard for unified matter…
“all of creation dose have one standard of unified matter atomic structure divition”
let me explan , it in a simple exsample
we see the lighting and then hear the thunder ,in reality thats backwards from how it is created. but the cause of the thunder is nuetronic matter , . the nuetronic matter is moved in its surounding air mass thus wind moves the nuetronic partical matter causeing thunder (sound waves ) and the sound reaches a given seed and becomes lighting
thus nuetronic partical waves ,sound partical waves ,light partical waves …
the basic prime sequence structure …
no need to reply … good luck and good by …
