Things in movies that really bug you ...

In Species the woman is nearly 100% alien, she just mimics human appearance to fool the researchers. The reason the kid is 100% alien too is because the alien DNA is supposed to surplant human DNA and replace it.
The VCR I used to have made enough noise to drown out a jet whether forwarding or rewinding. My current VCR is a little quieter, but it still makes an awful lot of noise when you rewind it or forward it.

The thing that bugs me the most in movies is serial killers having supernatural powers for no explicible reason. I think Micheal Myers and Jason Vorhees are perfect examples of this. I can accept the fact that these killers are supernaturally strong because they’re insane. I can even accept that they’d be more resistant to pain for the same reason. But these characters usually take enough punishment to kill ten people during the movie. Not to mention the fact that he usually gets killed in a pretty spectacular fashion at the end of the movie. Yet there he is hale and hearty at the beginning of the next film. I also hate the fact that these characters constantly show up in places where no normal person could get to in the time involved. Did these characters master teleportation?
Another thing that bugs me is when the put a character in a movie just so he can be killed. I think the Star Trek films are particularly bad in this matter.

Err…sorry about the erronious Species explanation. :o
The alien DNA in the woman’s system basically uses the human DNA provided to mimic the human form. Once she escapes she’s guided by instinctual behavior provided by the DNA. What bugged me most about this film is that it seemed (to me at least) basically an excuse to show the lead actress naked as much as possible. Not that I mind naked women, but if their going to make a soft porn film why not just say so. Don’t diguise it as an SF film.

Ah, but making it SF makes soft-porn respectable. Disguising it as SF allows the producers to claim they’re really trying to say something about an Important Issue, genetic engineering in this case.

I find this kind of duplicity annoying too.

…the director’s cut, a sniplet of film the director inserts to explain something happening later. All is does is ruin the ending.
The worst director’s cut was in Aliens 3 when people are dying everywhere but the director inserts three seconds of a hot bucket cracking/exploding when suddendly chilled. I almost walked out of the theater right then and there. The movie was ruined, no surprise ending.

My pet peeves:

-Defusing the bomb will never be completed until less than 10 seconds remain on the clock (and do real bombs have a big red LED countdown on them anyway)

-**rdone explanations[/b get the viewer up to speed:
“How are you today clyde?”
“well Jason, I’m fine, except as you know the space station that we’re living in will plummet into the black hole in 48 hours”
“Yes Clyde, but don’t forget that the oxygen reserves will only last us another ninety minutes…”

-t pile of empty cardboard cartons that is always there for the hero to fall into when punched.

-Antidotes that will still work even when administered as the patient is actually dying.

-beating on a dead man’s chest and shouting “come on, don’t give up on me now” will usually revive him.

-Leather gloves -why do the bad guys always wear them.

-futuristic body armour that is obviously made from motorbike tyres.

My pet peeves:

-Defusing the bomb will never be completed until less than 10 seconds remain on the clock (and do real bombs have a big red LED countdown on them anyway)

-Overdone explanations get the viewer up to speed:
“How are you today clyde?”
“well Jason, I’m fine, except as you know the space station that we’re living in will plummet into the black hole in 48 hours”
“Yes Clyde, but don’t forget that the oxygen reserves will only last us another ninety minutes…”

-that pile of empty cardboard cartons that is always there for the hero to fall into when punched.

-Antidotes that will still work even when administered as the patient is actually dying.

-beating on a dead man’s chest and shouting “come on, don’t give up on me now” will usually revive him.

-Leather gloves -why do the bad guys always wear them.

-futuristic body armour that is obviously made from motorbike tyres.

My American aunt and uncle lived in London for twelve years; their three kids were born there. They moved to the US when the oldest was twelve and the youngest was five, and all three had very serious English accents. My aunt and uncle had picked up slight accents and English word usage in their twelve years there, but they still had extremely different accents from their kids.

But where did Hayley Mills get her accent in The Parent Trap?

My big problem with movies isn’t really a continuity thing; it’s just something that grates, and that is when someone tries to pretend that they’re someone else. Like when a girl pretends to be a boy to play football, or when a boy makes up a fake background to impress some girl. This is sooo predictable, sooo lame, and it always ends up the same way. Couldn’t you come up with a better plot? The only exception to my total loathing of this storyline is Some Like It Hot, which is a great movie anyway.

Then we see the real-life mates of Celine Dion, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Angelina Jolie, among others.

Truth is stranger than fiction.

People like you who talk in the movies while I’m trying to suspend my disbelief :smiley:

Just kidding. I have nothing valuable to add to this thread at the moment.

Carry on.

-“Human Shield”: No bullet, no matter how large or small, will pass through a body into another.
(Total Recall)

-Or anything that is rediculously recognized as “bullet proof”: Wood tables, knocked-over chairs, modern walls, car doors, cars themselves (surprise! They’re NOT!), clothing dummies…

Speaking of bullets:
-WOUNDS:
No wonder there is so much gunplay in America. Everybody seems to be under the assumption that if

  1. you shoot someone with a gun, they’ll still be able to walk around/breathe. “Hydrostatic shock” does not occur.
  2. you shoot someone with a .22 calibre shell, nobody will die. In fact, they might just be alright after a quick bandage job using an old shirt. You need at LEAST a 9mm…and about three of those.

-Car smashes through glass…and no flat tires/dents/broken windshields
(The Rock)

-“Double-round binoculars”
…uh, no. When a person looks through binoculars, they see one circle.

-No matter what the employment, the protagonist’s home is always a large, well-furnished place with a great view.
(Heat)

-He/She can afford to have a relatively expensive car (either brand new or, if older, in concours condition)
AND
…never run out of gas,
…never have motor trouble,

But, HEY EVERYbody’s rich and good looking in the real world, didn’t you KNOW that?

-That’s right up there with “Technology ALWAYS works”
(Computer’s never crash or seize, phones don’t cut out, printers (run out of paper, but) never out of ink…)

-People can always outrun an explosion or rushing water.
(Most “Adventure” movies)

Speaking of water:
-It’s night. You’re underwater. But you can still see things FIVE FEET AWAY CLEARLY underwater.
(Lethal Weapon 4, What Lies Beneath)
-Grocery bags are light; Because eggs, meat, packaged goods and all liquids have the same mass as styrofoam.

-Car chase scenes: People will always be able to jump out of the way… no matter how fast you’re going.
Traffic? What traffic? When there is traffic, there will always be room to maneuver around the cars that are there… drivers in a chase will never get “blocked in”.
(Ronin, Taxi)

Danimal:“What does bother me is that we don’t see any older-but-still-beautiful women hook up with younger guys. Let Fanny Ardant and Isabella Rosellini in on some of the action!”
…never saw “White Palace” or “Bull Durham”, huh? There ARE other episodes of this happening. Not so much the norm, but they are out there.

-The amount of damage that a person fighting bad guys is easily explained, ignored, or negated by the fact that he actually GETS/KILLS the bad guy. Insurance companies and bureaucratic law enforcement agencies do NOT demand the paperwork or monetary compensation that needs to be filled out in these instances:
“You just created $5 million dollars worth of private and property damage… and don’t ask me how I came to that figure seeing as insurance companies don’t get their heads together that quickly…”
“…but I killed the bad guy.”
“OH! So you even have no arrest to show for it. Great. Wonderful. What was he at fault for again?”
“Second-degree murder.”
“So, essentially, your actions, which were directly or indirectly resposible for the injuries of 15 people and the deaths of 2 other people during that car chase twelve minutes ago through the mall will be ignored because you managed to kill the guy who ran over a kid…”
“Yeah, that was my thinking.”

…“Okay. Sure, I’ll take care of all the paperwork, too, because as a Captain, I’m not overworked with other responsibilities of the precinct.”

Which allows me to finish off with:
-He’s the “best cop on the beat”, but he’s also the Captain’s nemesis until the very end.

Heh, heh, heh. I call that preview “Thirty-Eight Ways to Dislocate Your Shoulder.”

Bad guy walking along floor in disused warehouse, good guy pounces on him from a catwalk above, but instead of doing so silently, he has to shout ‘YAAAaahhhhh’, alerting the bad guy in enough time for him to turn around and fight.

Ok, here is something that bugs THE SHIT OUT OF ME.

Recently, HBO has been airing these dumb movies at odd hours. They are basically made for TV movies that take a theatrical blockbuster movie, steal the plot, replace the actors with B grade actors, and use cheasy special effects (bad blue screens, archive footage, or actual footage from other films).

Specifically, there was some ‘president gets kidnapped’ movie where the bad guy is cornered by the good guy (played by Eric Roberts). The good guy has a gun pointed at his head and they have this freakin conversation for 5 minutes. The conversation ends when the bad guy says the good guy “made a mistake because hes too close” and takes his gun away. The good guy then says the bad guy screwed up because “the gun isn’t loaded and he never keeps a round chambered” and then steals the gun back.

The entire time I’m like “just fuckin shoot him!!! You can explain shit to him while his brains are leaking out the back of his head!!”.

So that’s my pet peave. Just shoot the bad guy and gloat later.

the main thing in movies that bug me is…the price to see the bloody thing.

Expletives aside, I agree. In The Peacemaker, an otherwise unremarkable flick, there is a scene where George Clooney is being chased by The Bad Guy. At the end of the chase Clooney gets the BG to wreck his car. Clooney walks up to the crash, pulls out his gun and without saying a word or pausing he shoots the guy. I think that was completely in character and it was cool to see a Good Guy making sure the Bad Guy can’t follow him to another scene and make trouble. :wink:

Speaking of The Peacemaker there’s something in that movie that really bugs me!

SPOILER ALERT!!!

Why the hell don’t they just cut all the wires to the explosive on the bomb at the end instead of trying to pry some of it away from the warhead (which probably wouldn’t have been enough to keep the thing from going critical)? Admittedly, they wouldn’t have had that shot of them jumping through the stainglass window at the end (which is impossible BTW) as the thing went off, but it would have been more realistic.

The movie with the exploding monitor is Final Destination, right? Ahh…I laughed with that movie.

Strange things that bug me:

People crash into glass windows, walls, panels, etc., yet they have not an injury, not a minor scratch not a darn drop of blood. That really anoys me because I once did a similar thing, and guess what? Some of the glass entered my ear and started bleeding.

The thing about movies that bugs me the most is…
…the real reason why studio heads, writers, directors and producers insist on putting as many cliches as they can into their movies…
…Check out the lastest grosses for “Pearl Harbor.”
Another thing that bugs me is movies where they’re whispering so softly that you can barely hear them one minute, then they blast you out of the theater with overly loud music a moment later.

The Mummy was on Starz again Sunday morning, so I watched the first ten minutes again. Just before the Legionnaire sequence begins, there is a title that says “Hamunaptra - 1923”. The remainder of the film is set in 1925.

So everyone is eight or ten years older in the scond movie. They sure don’t LOOK that much older.

KarlGrenze wrote:

The glass started bleeding?

Call the Vatican, it’s a genuine Miracle!