I meant self-serving in this precise instance: he’s making what is, I think, a likely unwarranted and unsubstantiated inference about Obama because it serves his agenda (Agenda-serving is less punchy than self-serving).
That said, I do think Dawkins is often a bit self-serving because I think he genuinely likes being an Atheist mouthpiece, and he knows that ballsy, arguably insulting statements in public forums help keep him in that place.
Pretty much. If he says he’s a Christian and acts to fit in as a Christian agenda(s) then it’s really only a matter of intellectual interest whether he’s really a Christian inside his head. It makes no practical difference.
So, both Gandhi and Martin Luther King applied Jesus’ principles to their life’s work, and were successful. So what you said earlier has been disproven twice over.
And yet it did.
“Love your enemies” benefits the clergy? There was no Christian clergy when Jesus said it. And it sure didn’t benefit the Jewish establishment, which is why they crucified Him.
Actually, that “love thy neighbor” stuff wasn’t written by him, and I’ve heard Jesus vehemently deny that he was ever associated with it. Despite that fact that it was written in the Jesus Newsletter.
This. I used to agree with Dawkins on this Then, about a year ago, we had a thread about a related topic: whether it is hypocritical for atheist liberals to mock theist conservatives for their sky-fairy beliefs, but not theist liberals for theirs.
In that thread, several Dopers convinced me that Obama probably IS a “believing Christian”. I conceded that I WOULD, therefore, hold this “against him” – that indeed it lowered my opinion of him somewhat (though I still mostly like the guy and his policies.)
Jesus didn’t write everything in the newsletter; it just had his name on it. For crying out loud, he didn’t even read all of the articles and it was edited by a friend.
Maybe it’s been so ingrained in me by society that I cannot impartially determine this, but it seems to me that the golden rule is so basic and logical that any non-sociopath would probably come up with it on his or her own.