So, I’m in the middle of this weeklong class to get taught on how to assess airfields based on their already-existing construction. Basically, given dirt strip, gravel strip (semi-improved), asphalt, or concrete, you dig down and find the different soil types and start your work.
I’m an Electrical Engineer. I have no fuckin’ idea about what the different soil types are.
But that’s okay. We have this tool called a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer [DCP], which will tell you how hard it is to drive through different layers, and through the use of charts with tiny, tiny, [sub]tiny fuckin’ lines[/sub], you can figure out your California Bearing Ratio [CBR]. I’m a “sparkchaser”. I’ve never really been to California, nor do I care what bearing it has on this class right now.
So, with your new-found CBRs, you can find the acceptable gross load [AGL] of an aircraft given limits you either set, or are given, thankfully through more charts. If you’re working with a dirt/gravel strip or asphalt concrete [AC], you have charts to tell you the AGL and acceptable number of passes (times you can run over the same spot without overstressing anything) for that AGL, or vice versa.
If you’re working with concrete [PCC], you first have to find the “K” value of all your subgrades, and then the ‘effective “K”’ by which you take into account all of the layers under that first layer of base course (the second layer on down). Then, you have to find the Load Factor [LF] given the thickness of the PCC, and calculate your Design Factor [DF], which thankfully . . . through more fuckin’ charts, will tell you the number of passes you can make.
Oh, but it gets better. If you have an “overlay”, being AC laid on top of PCC, you have a formula which will give you a replacement thickness value for either the layers of AC, PCC, which you can find either the AGL, or K values through the use of. . . [Abbot and Costello] . . . * more charts!*[/A&C].
So you can figure everything out. But wait, it gets better! Pilots apparently don’t talk in engineering terms. They like Aircraft Condition Numbers and Pavement Classification Numbers [ACNs and PCNs]. And, if we want, we can go back into history to Landing Condition Numbers [LCNs], we have charts to convert to several different systems: The British, and Air Mobility Commands’ [AMC’s] Weight Bearing Calculator [WBC], or some other system the International Civil Aviation Organization [ICAO] thought up.
And I haven’t even mentioned the bonuses one can reap if their Pavement Condition Indicator [PCI] (a subjective scale where the actual condition of your pavement is scored by the use of . . . more charts!) is high or low, either letting you land a fuckin’ 1,000,000 lb. spaceship on your runway, or limiting Newark Liberty’s to a 5,600 lb. Cessna.
Yeah, this class is real fuckin’ fun. At 4:00PM I left work, came home, relaxed for half an hour, and made dinner. I started at 6:30PM, and am just now taking a break. My head hurts from all these fucking factors and variables, but the worst is . . . the charts! Little tiny fucking lines a gnat needs a magnifying glass to see. :smack: I need a fuckin’ beer. . . But, after my test on Friday, I’ll be able to tell you what can or cannot land on any surface you put in front of me. Yeah, real impressive with the ladies. :rolleyes: But even better for bar tricks! [sub]I can’t believe I fuckin’ volunteered for this class. . . what the hell was I thinking?[/sub]
But, after venting some geek rage, I tried to make a sensical phrase out of all the damned anagrams I speak. My result:
:smack:
“Mothers, don’t let your sons grow up to be engineers. Let 'em grow up to be lawyers and doctors and such. . .”
Tripler
:: cracks a beer and salutes :: “Nerd Power!”

