In that case, I think you can wash electronic components/boards etc. in pure distilled water. I’ll check on that later in the day… so don’t go a dippin’ yet. Or maybe someone here can confirm/deny.
If it is a Simpson, you can still buy the manual for it (see this Google search ). I just got a 262, sans manual, and am quite happy with its performance. The 22 volt batteries it uses can be hard to find though.
Swabbing the case with alcohol, or even a cleaner like 409 should get rid of much of the smoke odor for you.
Ah, gotcha. Not me. With reasonable care, those old Simpson meters will last just about forever. We had a bunch of 270s at the place I used to work at and I loved them. If I had one, it would only be relegated to the display case after it had died. I regret not holding on to one my dad gave me as a kid, but I was young and stupid then…
I really can’t understand the attraction of something like this. (Not to the OP, but to the others in this thread getting sentimental about it).
Last week, the first LCD DMM that I ever bought died. I bought it 25 years ago. It didn’t last “forever”, but it was certainly a long time. It performed flawlessly all that time. Plus, no parallax error, no accidentally reading off the wrong scale, no non-linear resistance scale, none of that crap.
And I’m not going to try to fix it. It’s just a tool, and a very old one at that. I’ll get a cheapie for everyday use, and reserve the newer ones for datalogging, or high precision work.
What, honestly, makes analog VOMs attractive? To me, it sounds just like someone saying that hard point saws and tungsten carbide cutting tips take all the fun out of carpentry and machining, because anyone can use them without having to learn the painful and now useless practice of blade sharpening.
I’ve always had a soft spot for nostalgic electronic devices, which is probably why I own four or five Simpson meters. I love those things. But I’ll also be the first to admit that any $20 modern meter will outperform them. A modern meter is smaller, more accurate, more sensitive, more stable, has more functions, better readability, has much higher input impedance when measuring voltage, and (usually) lower impedance when measuring current. And it’s cheaper.
Desmostylus - analog VOMs do one thing very well that DMMs just plain suck at - they will show changing voltage or current with needle sweeps, quivers, twitches and such, rather than flashing a new number at you 4 times a second.
My newer DMMs have bargraphs across the bottom of the screen to show that sort of thing. Not that I ever use them for that. Pocket 'scopes are much better.
Is that a scope in your pocket or are you really happy to see me?
Guess it’s been a while since I’ve been shopping for test gear. The last scope I worked with to any great extent was a marvel of smallness at roughly shoebox-size. Next came the PC-based display/logging sort, but that was even bigger.