You’ve got to love that arrangement of Africa. I swear, college a capella has kept Toto’s name fresh well beyond its “use by” date.
Frankly, if I were the members of Toto, I’d be pissed that other young guys are still getting laid for performing this song while they aren’t getting any of that action. Where’s their piece of the pie!?!?
As your later post notes, they at least were within their legal rights to make such a demand, stupid as we all might find it.
What’s even worse is that ISPs and content-hosting websites generally cave in to copyright challenges without checking their validity, and in many cases will remove perfectly legal content or, in the case of ISPs, non-infringing websites, on the mere say-so of any third party who happens to make a challenge.
A few years ago, an organization in Europe devoted to sensible copyright tested out about a dozen European ISPs. They got an account with each of the ISPs, and posted identical website content on each one. The content on the website was, IIRC, the text of a work that had been in the public domain for decades, perhaps even centuries. There was no possible copyright claim that anyone could make on it.
Then, having posted this content, they sent letters, on law firm letterhead, to each of the ISPs claiming copyright ownership of the content, and asking that it be removed.
Something like half of the ISPs removed the “offending” websites immediately, asking no questions of the claimants, and providing the site owners with no opportunity defend their content or refute the copyright claim. Another couple of ISPs informed the site owners, and still shut the sites down even though the owners attempted to make clear that the content was in the public domain. Only a few ISPs offered their customers any sort of protection from, or resistance to, fraudulent copyright claims.
This is all from memory; i’ll see if i can find the study online, because it doesn’t seem to be in my bookmarks anywhere.