(Medical advice question)
Okay, background: kaylasmom was diagnosed with Type II diabetes in 1994. Except for during her 1995-1996 pregnancy, she has attempted to maintain her blood sugars using oral meds. Some have been more effective than others, and some have had side effects that required abandonment.
It may be relevant to note that she is blind from birth (not diabetes-related), and has been told that she is not a good candidate for an insulin pump on account of that. It may also be relevant to note that, in terms of being a compliant patient, her record could be characterized as “spotty.”
Anyways, down through the years, her HbA1c has been sometimes better, sometimes worse. Her latest one was one of the worse ones, and her PCP decided to insist that she get back to an endocrinologist, to see if there’s another oral medication she can try.
So (after blowing off and rescheduling her initial appointment in June), she went to see him two weeks ago. He had her immediate blood sugar tested (very high, in excess of 450 mg/dl), took a non-fasting blood draw for a test of some kind, and turned her over to his diabetic educator (NB: “his” diabetic educator is actually employed by Roche, according to her business card).
The diabetic educator put her on a regimen with a new meter, which allows you to tell it how many grams of carbohydrates your next meal will contain, and tells you how many units of fast-acting insulin you should take. If your blood sugar is low, it will also tell you how many grams of carbs to ingest right now. During the past two weeks, her blood sugars have been dramatically improving (compliance can be REALLY effective, right? ;)).
SO: Today, she went for a follow-up visit to the endocrinologist. The gist of his interaction with her was that he told her that the results of her blood test showed a reduced kidney function, which indicated that she was no longer a good candidate for oral meds. He also suggested that she ask the diabetic educator to evaluate her for fitting with an insulin pump.
Having had a few hours for this to sink in, kaylasmom is beginning to freak out that “reduced kidney function” means that she should be preparing herself emotionally for life as a dialysis patient. About which she has stated (and is currently stating) she would prefer to die.
Now, I recognize that we should have asked for more information at the time, but we didn’t (but we will. Just, it might be a while before we get the chance). The fact that he dropped the “kidney function” line without any numbers, but just as an indicator that she shouldn’t count on oral meds for glucose control, suggests to me that he does NOT see her as a candidate for dialysis (and she could have either of my kidneys for the asking – if we were a match), just not a good candidate for glucose control by oral meds. Am I wrong to have that impression?
Anyway, how does a kidney function result suggest anything about the efficacy of any non-kidney-disease-related medication? If he had mentioned a liver function result, I might be inclined to think differently about it.
Also, the doctor said that the initiation of an insulin pump doesn’t involve any surgical procedures, which is contrary to the impression we’ve always had about insulin pumps. Has insulin pump technology advanced to the stage there it can be used entirely non-invasively?