Thud! (Major Spoilers! Do not enter!)

Finally read Thud! a few weeks ago, so I’ll toss out a few uncensored thoughts. BEWARE OF SPOILERS!

  • Vetinari stepping down? I can’t see it myself, as he’s too interesting a character. Pterry will keep Havelock around until the end of time.

  • And in that vein, I can’t see Vimes taking over as Patrician, either. He wouldn’t want the job, and he’d hate every second of it. He has a decent role in Thud! as the de facto head of Ankh-Morpork law enforcement (and part-time diplomat), and can tread water in that role.

  • I didn’t think the naked-Sally-and-Angua bit was titilation as much as just acknowledging the limits of the characters. Sally turning into a flock of bats was a novel idea, though.

  • I also don’t think Thud! changes the characterizations of the Discworld trolls and dwarfs too much, at least not initially. The two races have already been rather reconciliatory in earlier Discworld books, especially in Ankh-Morpork; if anything, the mounting antagonism in Thud! seems slightly contrived for this one, just to provide tension. My inner geek likes the idea of A-M trolls and dwarfs reconciling their differences at the game board, though.

  • Finally, I flipped through Where’s My Cow? at the bookstore, but didn’t pick it up. Amusing, but it’s a bit too thin for me, and doesn’t seem to work as a real “children’s primer” – it seems more of a novelty for adult Discworld fans.

Show of hands…how many here own either a Discworld Mappe, one of the Almanacs, or a copy of anny Ogg’s Cookbook?

Thought so. :smiley:

My daughter likes “Where’s my Cow?” My husband is displeased because she has tried to chew on it.

Looks like she’s developing a fondess for steak already.

Every time I saw the reference to “Where’s My Cow?” I keep thinking of the stoner version, “Dude, Where’s My COW?”

I don’t remember all these historical Discworld facts like the rest of you guys do. To me, Pratchett is all about characterization and dialogue, not painstaking accuracy.

Interesting thoughts about Vetinari making Vimes the next Patrician. Vimes wouldn’t want the position, but Vetinari would maneuver the situation to where he had no choice.

I’ve got a copy of the Mappe of Ankh-Morpork. I also have The Pratchett Portfolio, The Art of Discworld, and the GURPS Discworld RPG handbook. Do they count? :slight_smile:

Oh, yeah. The world is filled with people who want to actually see and feel the Disc. I’m setting out this Christmas…I mean Hogwatch to actually cook some of the recipes in Nanny Ogg’s cookbook.

Except those that require scumble. :slight_smile:

Scumble would be easy. It just contains apples.
Well, mainly apples…

[spoiler]Carrot came to the city at age sixteen, and was already a six-foot-six powerhouse who beat the hell out of all the customers in the Mended Drum and knocked Detritus out cold at the very same time. With boots and helmet he’s about as tall a Death. He not only pulled his sword from stone, he put it there to begin with. He’s a tiger stalking a city of sheep, if I recall Angua’s metaphor correctly, he wears the city like a cloak. Under his gaze even the most criminal bastard wants to be good. Even Big Fido merely bit him instead of tearing his arm off. He single handedly prevented at least a couple of riots, and when one was about to begin, everybody turned to him to follow his lead. He even got Nobby and Colon to follow him in ambushing a noble dragon, and he arrested the dragon in front of the entire populace. He’s the mythical king of Ankh-Morpork who’s smart enough to know that being king would be a Bad Idea.

Then some backwater fundies show up and all of the sudden he’s on the outside of the dwarf community looking in? I don’t buy it. It gives short shrift to the character.[/spoiler]

Rebuttal:

Carrot was “on the outs” only with the new arrivals; the dwarfs of Ankh-Morpork were – for the most part – still giving him the same respect he had before. It might have been tempered because the city dwarfs weren’t sure how to reconcile their feelings for Carrot with the resurgent waves of dwarf fundamentalism at the time.

[spoiler]I guess I got a different impression. Although I can’t recall anything specific enough to make the point, it seemed to me that the dwarf community became verily closed to him. I mean, given the relationship between him and the city, it seems like there would have been plenty of dwarves letting him know about the murder almost as soon as it happened. And while the fundie influence may had have a cooling effect on the city dwarves who were suffering from split loyalties, and while even those whose loyalties weren’t so split would have been victims of fundie intimidation, it still seems that his relationship w/ them would be far too strong to be overridden. Even if a tiny percentage kept him in an intimate loop, that’d still be a lot of connections that’d remain.

But I guess that it’s the character of Carrot that really makes the case for me. I mean, Big Fido, the most ill-tempered, hostile, human hater in the city merely gave him a bite. I’ve never seen any indication that he’s even intimidated by Vetinari, or has anything less than the man’s full respect.

Obviously we don’t agree, and that’s cool with me. I’m not trying to convince anybody so much as just explaining my view of the book.[/spoiler]

It’s a great book. I read it in two days & couldn’t put it down. There was just that bit that bothered me.

Finally managed to grab a copy of the book. I think he will take the whole Koom valley thing somewhere interesting and not neccesarily to the obvious conclusions. Koom valley will do a lot to reconcile troll/dwarf relations but it’s not going to be the pancea it intitially appeared to be. Like on roundworld, maybe overt specieism will be frowned upon but much mroe subtle forms of discrimination might develop and evolve. Look at the work he’s done on the clacks, evolving it from a rather simple and obvious technical innovation and then delving into the social and psychological complications that such a device creates.

Like I said, I got it as a treat for finishing (and doing quite well in) my exams.

I read it in a few hours, and will re-read it slowly and with more care later.

I agree that Carrot wasn’t, well Carrotty enough, but he hasn’t been for quite a while.

Vetinari is going nowhere. He wasn’t a major character in this book, but he was actually pulling all the strings.

I love the Trolls and Dwarfs…however Crysoprase wearing a suit makes me think of Troll strippers, and although it’s a nice visual image for him, it doesn’t feel right.

The one thing I did notice…Pterry’s puns are getting worse.

It’s a nice way to spend an afternoon, not deep and meaningful, but when i’m being told that racism and fundamentalism are bad things by Pterry, it’s much more palatable than when almost anyone else does it.

I agree withthe general tone of comments so far. It wasn’t a bad book, but it was very bland.

And the characters did seem to be acting a bit… strange. It was so much like they were being smaller-than-life caricatures of themselves that by about half way through I started to speculate that it was actually a story of a play about the characters, or taking place in a paralell (parasite?) universe. I was almost waiting for the sudden twist when this was all resolved as an alternate history. Either hat or it was ghost written.

Carrot was incompetent, dull and uninspiring. He did nothing that I could see, he seemed to simply exist. Considering that Carrot is supposed to be larger-than-life even in a world full of larger than life characters he was particularly bland. You could have substituted Cheery for Carrot in just about every scene and lost nothing. Carrot who can ride into a camp of hostile D’regs or a pack of Uberwald mountain wolves and immediately take over leadership. yet we are supose dto believe the dsame Carrot was having evidence of a major crime hidden from him by dwarves he has known for years? And he was unware that their were tunnels under the whole city? And 6 dwarves, all working in the tunnels, went missing simulatneously and he was totally ignorant? No way. That simply isn’t the same character. Carrot knows everyone on the city by name. He knows the whole city like the back of his hand. He is the King of Ankh, and in Discworld mythos the king and the country are one. There is simply no way he could be unware of major excavations continuing for months, much less a mass murder in the dwarf community.

Vimes has become a sell-out, and if he continues as he did in this novel he will become just another petty Guild cheif. Vimes has always trodden awfully close to the line of abuse of power and corruption. He torched the college of heralds for example because he knew he couldn’t prove anything against the villain in a court of law. He set out to kill Wolfgang because he knew he had no other choice. He has full knowledge that Nobby abuses his position of power to commit petty thefts and tolerates it. He has commited countless acts that would make a ‘real’ police officer into just another criminal. But Vimes remained a sympathetic character because he was Vimes. He was scrupulously just and honest even if he was commiting illegal acts. If Vimes decided that Nobby was worth the crimes he commited then it was an honest appraisal. And if Vimes didn’t honestly believe something was in the best interests of his city he would act, whether that be arresting Nobby or arresting Vetinari.
In this novel Vimes is so much reduced that it casts a whole new light on his previous actions. The old Vimes who commited all those criminal acts would never have had second thoughts about enteirng any part of his city. But somehow because it’s underground he tolerates it and becomes diplomatic? Vimes allwoing anyone to dictate how a murder investigation would be carried out and by whom was simply unbelievable. Sam Vimes would never concede to amurder investigation being done in the dark. It’s almost the total antithesis of the Vimes motto of everthing being done in the light where peiople can see it.

That was a really jarring note for me. I could forgive the Vimes character his transgressions precisely because he was a simple man who saw the small picture: a crime is commited, he punishes the criminal. He had no time or undertsanding for legal complexisties or diplomacy. A Vimes that worries about diplomacy and legal niceties like “how deep does the city go” may be a more believable nobleman and diplomat, but if Pterry continues taking him down this path without seriously curtailing his illegal activities he will destroy the character. I noticed what I thought was an attempt to re-write history by suggesting that Nobby only steals from the watch petty cash fund. But Nobby has also freely admitted to stealing from any buildings he finds unlocked, and he steals from the evidence lockers and there have been strong hints that he still loots corpses.

I was also disappointed at the use of ‘clues’. Pterry has always had a distrust of clues in the past, and siad so outright. Clues are there to misdirect, or else the footprints in the flower bed were put there by the window washer. Yet for some reason the deep dwarfs left behind their listening horn when they sealed up the tunnels. And even though they were strong enough to overpower 6 healthy dwarven miners simulataneously they couldn’t bury the bodies. I’ll accept they thought the killings were justified, but the idea that they’d leave them without even bothering to bury them (or even collapse the tunnels) seems totally implausible. Far too convenient.

And the behaviour of the dwarves themselves was at odds with past behaviour. In “Men at Arms” when a dwarf was killed it was a big deal in the dwarf community. Here 6 dwarfs were murdered simulatenously an Vimes new nothing, Vetinari’s spies knew nothing and even Carrot was kept in the dark.

This was one point that I really was expecting to get resolved. I could almost believe the dwarf preists managed to cover up the murder of one of their own for a day or so. But how could they cover up the murder of 6 AM citizens for several days? But Pterry made no attempt at explaining this. He seems to have assumed they could do it, in apparent contradiction to everything we know about Vetinari and Vimes’ spy networks and Carrot’s connection with the citizens of AM, and the dwarf community especially. The idea that someone could construct tunnels under AM that could come up inside the cellar of a citizen as important as Vimes, and that Vetinari would be completely ignorant of it, is totally at odds with the developed character of Vetinari. He knows eveything of any interest that happens in his city. Maybe Vimes doesn’t have clerks going through nightsoil records looking for this sort of thing, but we know damn well that Vetinari does. So how did this slip under his radar?

The one bright point I thought the highlighting of Vimes’ different tretamentof the Deep Dwarfs and Mister Shine. That was classic Pratchett, and it really should have played a far greater role. In fact it should have been a major plot point. Vimes tretaing the Dwaf leaders with respect for diplomatic reasons but treating Mr. Shine like a suspect because he’s a troll. This from a man who belives he isn’t speciesist. It was a briliant peice of work, and gave just a flash of what Pratchett was at his peak. A truly interetsing insight into double standards in the real world, without being a bland and blatant allegoyy. Unfortunately the rest of the book was a bland and bllatant allegory.
All told the book seemed like Pterry was working on 4 or 5 different storylines: Vampire joins the watch and the rivalry with Angua. Carrot’s conflict betwen being a dwarf and an AM citizen. The idea of ethic enclaves within AM, Koom Valley.Then combined them into one book without fleshing out any of them.

Boring and uninspired. Not the worst discorld novel, but easily the worst published in the last 10 years.

Methinks you’re overexaggerting Carrot’s influence a bit here. Yes, Carrot is reknown and respected by everyone in Ankh-Morpork under normal circumstances, but it seems obvious to me that Thud! is taking place under abnormal circumstances. The arrival of the dwarf fundamentalists should not be lightly discounted; they apparently had a lot of influence on the city dwarfs, and could easily keep Carrot out of the loop by denigrading his human origins behind his back. Carrot is not omnipotent; if people feel really compelled not to tell him something, they won’t – and unless he has strong suspicions to press the point, he won’t.

I felt that he restrained himself very reluctantly; with the Koom Valley anniversary setting everyone on edge already, pissing off the dwarf community could have easily started a city-wide civil war.

Those might have been instances in the past that he no longer does nowadays, with Vimes leaning on him behind the scenes. At least, I don’t get the impression that Nobby does anything worse than bum a free donut or coffee these days, myself. Nobby is, in any case, easily thwarted – the only thing people put in the evidence locker are the stuff they want Nobby to take. :wink:

Wasn’t there a worry that the rising water level would get them (the fundamentalist killers), too?

How fast do the dwarfs dig? The novel suggests they dig pretty darn fast, which mean the tunnels under the Ramkin estates might have been dug that same day.

We know Vimes has traces of speciesism in him – just look at his reluctance to having a vampire in the Watch.

I’ll strongly disagree; IMO, Thud! is one of Terry’s better reads in quite a while. I’d easily rank it above Monstrous Regiment (which was also very somber, but extremely dry) and Jingo (funny, but doesn’t go anywhere) as examples.

Au contrarire. I took pains to point out that he is respected and can take command anywhere under any circumstances. He took command of a tribe of ‘D’regs, he took control of both sides on a battelfield in the middle of a freakin’ war. As a policeman he took control of two of the most teenage streetgangs in the city and had them playing CUb Scouts. He took control of a pack of Uberwald mountain wolves a day after they had lost their leader. He can take control of a riot as it’s happening.

That’s one of the defining traits of the Carrot character: he isn’t affected by circumstances, he fits in, anywhere, at any time. He warps reality around himself. He changes the circumstances, or at least people’s perceptions of the circumstances. And he does it largely unwittingly. The character is deliberately larger than life. He is the archetypal fanstasy king. He is Aragorn and Merlin and Canute and Ceasar and Alexander all rolled into one.

To say that such a character is now resitricted by circumstances, when in the past he has shown that he can immediately assume command under any circumstances, is a major re-write of the character as well as the entire character type.

That directly contradicts all previous represenations of Carrot, where he can extract information simply by saying nothing. The other person then feels compelled to fill in the blanks for him. Most notably seen in his ‘interrogation’ of the Fools guild members, but seen in numerous other sitiuations as well. The idea that a Carrot who is in intimate daily contact with the Dwarf community could have information withheld from him is totally out of keeping with the character as it has been represented so far.

Carrot may not be omnipotent, but he is certainly supernaturally powerful, as are all the fantasy kings he is based on.

It wasn’t the fact that he restrained himself reluctantly, it’s the fact that he restrained himself at all. The same man had no qualms about setting sail for Klatch, and that act was interpreted as the sialingof an invasion fleet and did start a war, and placed AM at a massive disadvantage in that war.

I could believe that he’d restrain himself from brekaing the doors down. But the idea that the same Vimes was willing to concede that a murder investigation take place in the dark after it has been established that he has a right to investigate is totally out of character. If Vimes is doing his job he does it, properly, and in the light where everyone can see it. If it’s politics then he simply passes it on to Vetinari to sort out.

This weak parody of Vimes who is part hard-nosed copper and part politically savvy guild leader/nobleman is just a thug. He has become a charcter who will threaten guild leaders with an axe or burn down a building full of pricelss documents out of pique. But when he has to apply the actual law to people who can fight back he backs down and does a half-arsed, crippled invetsigation of a murder. By that one concession Vimes has become what he once said he despised: he has started aplying the law differentially to differnet groups. He has made the watch into just another gang/guild. No longer is Vimes law applied equally to all. If you’ve got enough axes and are willing to start a riot it won’t be applied ot you at all. But if you won’t start riots and chop knees off Vimes will burn down your guildhouse or threaten you with an axe.

As I said above, I could forgive the character for burning down a guldhouse full of priceless documents. (A point that should have been brought up by the Deep Dwarves since it is common knowledge amongst the AM guilds, and far more serious then being blackboard monitor WRT destroying words). The reason I could forgive such an act was because it was Vimes applying the law to everyone impartially. He would do that to anyone, or die trying. But now we are to believe that if the Heralds had threatened to start a riot he would have walked away and not even bothered with a proper investigation. Vimes is supposed to be a character who will carry out an investigation even when ordered not to, even at the risk of his badge and his life. Now we find out that there is an exception to the at universal: not if the criminals are prepared to start a riot to prevent it. Vimes law applies everywhere: just not this bit.

As recently as “Feet of Clay” Nobby was still a petty thief in all those ways. That was only a few years ago, and long after Vimes had become watch commander. The point being that long after Vimes had the power to stop this petty crime he still tolerated it. Something I could forgive of the Vimes character who was totally straight, applied justice to all and prepared to bend the rules. But a Vimes who will concede to a half-arsed murder investigation because it might start a riot is not nearly so sympathetics in that respect.

Yes, I appreciate the real-politik aspect of the situation, but if Vimes can see the necessities and politics now then there is no excuse for allowing Nobby’s crimes (or his own) because he is a small picture copper, which has always been his defence in the past. This new big-picture, politically expedient Vimes might be a natural character development, but unless Pterry makes damn sure he doesn’t break the law himself as he so often has (and continues to do) then he has simply become a corrupt police officer and Vetinari’s gestapo.

As I said, a few years ago (novels time) he admitted that he would take stuff from any unlocked businesses before he contacted the owner and asked them to lock up. That’s much worse than mumping donuts.

I’m not sure what you mean by “too”. Nobody was killed by the rising water. Several days to a week later Angua and Sally were almost trapped, but only because the area was poorly shored up. Given that it was only a few metres to the airlock door and the shoring had been put in place the day of the murders (presumably witin an hour of the murders) it’s inconcievable that was a worry for the murderers.

Those specific tunnels might have been, but that was only possible because the excavations were already inplace, and had already covered most of the city. That had taken several months, as the nightsoil records showed. Yet somehow Vetinari remained oblivious to this major security risk to his own city. Once again, possible in the real world but inconceivable for the character of Vetinari as it’s been developed so far.

Vetinari has suffered the same fate as carrot in this story. He has been taken from larger-than-life down to high level competent. In the real world he may not have known about the excavation, but the Discworld isn’t the real world, and Vetinari would never be ignorant of such a fact for months on end.

Vime doesn’t like anyone much. He certainly doesn’t like undead. But the point is that he credits himself with treatong al species, especially dwarves and trolls equally. The unthinking unequal treatment given to the dwarf and troll clerics was a really clever bit of writing. Pity it wasn’t capitalised on.

I think that Vetinari knows that if Vimes did want the job, he’d be inappropriate for it. If anything did happen to Vetinari (which I doubt) who else could do it?