IMO, not until he reaches 19.
Yes, competition is better and he is heads and tails better than anyone in his generation.
But it is hard to compare eras. Tiger played with SO MUCH better technology, (equipment and agronomy) than Jack. And yes, I realize the competition has the technology.
HOWEVER…(and bear with me with an open mind)
the old equipment puts a bigger degree of randomness in the equation. What does randomness do? Yields unpredictable results.
Simple Golf Example:
A Putting competition between you (an average hack) and Tiger Woods. 15 foot putts, straight putts, putts with 6" and 12" of break left and right. typical putts that you and tiger would see in a round of golf.
Do you have a better chance against Tiger with a perfect green?
Or do you have better chance if the green is littered with spike marks, ball marks, debris, etc.
IMO, the average hack has a much better chance against Tiger with the obstacles in the way.
Not that it would help your chances of making those putts, (It would actually hurt your chances) but it would hurt Tiger’s chances of making those putts a lot more than you.
An extreme example to illustrate my point, but quality control of golf clubs and golf balls is so much better today than it was 40 yrs ago in Nicklaus’ era. The old Balata balls would be out of round after a couple of hits. They would scar and blemish easily.
Same theory goes for clubs, shafts and heads.
And IMO, the biggest difference (and mostly ignored) is agronomy and lawn mowing. The grass is so much more consistent with technology in weed control, pest control, aeration, core sampling, acidity, etc.
And just the routine maintenance of the grass is much more consistent. Fairways and Greens are cut more precisely which leads to more predictable results.
Tiger is a great player, no doubt, the greatest of this generation, by far. But I would not call him the greatest ever.