At any rate, Reeder, you should be happy in that some of your usual detractors are even defending you from my “Who the fuck is this moron posting bullshit” comments.
But I have not bashed him (Reeder) at all. I simply pointed out that klaatu’s expectation that Reeder *may * use this as vehicle to Bush-bash IS reasonable, even if it’s imprudent to say so.
I know. I meant Klaatu was bashing. The use of “you” was a mistake on my part. It was not intended to mean you specifically, although that was the obvious reading of my post. My apologies.
No, they wouldn’t have. You stepped out of line. I seriously recommend you step away from the computer until you have a sincere apology to make.
And while you’re at it, would you mind showing me where “preemptive strike” is an acceptable debating tactic? Is it when you insult someone and then justify it by claiming that it was an ad hominem and a strawman rolled into one? I’m fuzzy on the logic behind that method.
And on preview: spooje, it may be reasonable to expect Reeder to start bashing Bush in this thread, but I think that it is also reasonable to wait until a man commits a crime to convict him for it and it is inexcusable to not do so.
Bolding mine.
Actually according to a Washington Post article on Tillman’s death it’s gotten better, although it doesn’t give us all the stats on the drop.
I don’t care how Tillman died. The fact that he gave up so much just to serve his country says to me he would’ve died a hero even if he had lived to be a hundred.
It is because of Bush. His stupid policies allowed for the military unit Tilman was in to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. His war on terrorism also sucks.
Before we get too carried away with out private vendettas, let us remember on this of all days that Pat Tilman is the representative and symbol of all the young men and women who have died in national service in the last year or so, whether that service was in Afghanistan (where our military presence is in my judgment entirely proper) or Iraq (where in my judgment it is not) or in a training accident at some State-side base. That his death may have been from so-called Friendly Fire ought to be no surprise. If you will speak to anyone who has been in combat, you will find out that in the few moments that many fire fights take the level of noise, excitement, confusion, shock and anxiety are so high that it is only remarkable that there are not more accidental deaths. The only thing that prevents such incidents is discipline (in the sense of training to anticipate and cope with the noise, confusion, shock and anxiety). In the event however there is never time to think. This sort of thing is inevitable. It does not take much of a miscalculation to cause real trouble. One of the better known incidents in Vietnam was the result of the failure by an artillery unit to consider the height of trees on a ridge line when lobbing shells into the valley beyond.
None of that however detracts from Tilman’s sacrifice or the sacrifice of all the others whom we have lost forever.
The most recent NY Times story (over here) says Corporal Tillman, who died on April 22, “probably died as a result of friendly fire while his unit was engaged in combat with enemy forces,” the Army said in a statement. An investigation made no specific finding of fault in the incident, the statement said.
Man, a combat soldier must feel such remorse over these types of incidents. Although they did not find a specific fault, there are some people in tremendous pain right now. So very tragic.