Aye, me too.
That topic has always interested me, but I’ve never quite had the courage to start a discussion on it. Not wishing to hijack this topic but I’ve searched and can’t find any direct topic on it. Would you know if it has been discussed here?
grey_ideas
Or even the great-nephew of Lord Mountbatten, who is probably a little better known. :dubious:
Certainly has. A few Dopers were asking after 9/11 if the US President’s zeal for going after all who aided and harboured terrorists would extend to those Americans who funded Irish terrorism.
Ahh, thank you. I must have missed those, I’ll have a dig around to find them. It’s interested me, in light of events over the last 4 years, whether there has been a reevaluation of past actions regarding terrorist funding from certain areas of the US.
Thanks Futile Gesture
grey_ideas
Why do think the IRA’s talking about giving up violence as weapon? It’s hard to rally up the jar in the local pub, when our boys and girls are dying to prevent the very thing your $10.00 is going towards.
The IRA started down the road of disarmament LONG before 9/11.
You’re an idiot.
I didn’t mention 9/11. I was really referring to the London bombing, which seems to me to be a real line in the sand, for the fence sitters. You can’t be screaming that Arab terrorists are evil and must be destroyed, when the IRA has done the same thing. You know, there’s no way around it; there’s no, “Well it’s different.” Some of the IRA’s greatest support comes from Americans, whether they want to admit that it went into bombings and terror or not.
Maybe it’s me, but went I was a kid, and even into my mid-teens there was jar on the bar or under it and that money went to fight the cause and would be surprised if there aren’t still a few jars around.
YMMV, of course.
And once again, the IRA have been in a discomissioning process since before 2001.
Perhaps I’m not being clear. Once the US had been attacked by other terrorists groups, the IRA despite their statements to stop using violence prior to those attacks; realized that they DARE not use violence anymore, as they would lose any American support they had. Now perhaps they intented to stop using violence and would have stuck to it, however once 9/11 happened and now the London bombings, violence is no longer an opinion to them; even if they wanted to use it.
Say, he’s the same razor-sharp European analyst who recently observed that France and the Netherlands’ lack of support for the EU constititution signaled the turning of the tide in Europeans’ attitudes toward socialist economic policies, and that the public is crying out for American-style approaches with regard to taxation and social programs, isn’t he?
How cute!