To the "non-believers" and anyone who wants to argue

At least you made it past the front cover. :smiley:

I don’t think that you can rationallly conclude there is no god. That’s the problem: there’s no way to apply scientific methods to prove or disprove such an entitiy. While I cannot subscribe to any deity-based religion I’ve encountered, I cannot dismiss out of hand that there is no “higher power” who set the ball rolling. Perhaps there is a god that is merely observing us without any intervention, or at least none that we can be aware of. There’s enough good in the world to make me suspect there is a god and a purpose for us beyond our understanding.

This, of course, does not preclude that we won’t cease to exist upon our death!

QUOTE=Ale]I don´t see the need to read the bible, or any and all other teological scriptures to then become an atheist based on it´s inconsitencies. It´s much simpler to asses the likelyhood of a supernatural, all knowing, omiscient and all that entity and reach the conclussion that such things just can´t exist.
Just like I don´t have to read a book on the existance of the Invisible Pink Unicorn to be convinced that there are no IPUs.
[/QUOTE]

Sorry, but I’m perfectly convinced that the Bible has brought a tremendous amout of harm to homosexuals, not only by directly calling it an “abomination,” but also indirectly through the intolerance and persecution of believers. There’s no way to deny the Bible hasn’t been widely used to condemn homosexuals. Right or wrong, overwhelming damage has been done thanks to “God.”

If you feel that way, why are you bothering to reply? Just ignore this thread! There’s plenty of other people who want to participate! But maybe you just can’t leave it alone . . . BTW - which section should I have used to start this post IYO?

Now you’re talkin’!

Here’s a few logical reasons (from my humble POV): How could all the synchronous beauty in the world have come about just by chance, even after “oceans of time” (to use a great line from a mediocre movie)? If we are the smartest beings that have ever graced the Earth, how is it that our bodies are smarter than us? That is, how is it that our bodies continue to function and take care of our well-being beyond our understanding? There’s still so much about how our physical selves operate that we have yet to discover! How is it that our world has an element for just about any need or desire we can conceive of? We have drugs, uranium, steel, snow, etc. all at our disposal, all for us to use or abuse as we see fit! Doesn’t that all seem just a little too perfect to be nothing more than random chance?

That seems more like a kind of argument from awed ignorance to me. You’re saying you don’t understand how these things can be, so you’re ascribing them to a cause (god) that if you ask me is much more unlikely than the existence of the things themselves.

These quotes do seem particularly hard to defend! How 'bout it Jews? Christians? … While you’re at it, I’m curious, how many different reasons are there that “God” says you can be put to death for? I can think of some pretty outrageous ones - for example, somewhere it says you could be executed merely for cursing your parents. I know, I know, that was a much heavier thing for people back then … but how could a TRUE and TIMELESS god establish such a cruel law?

No, not really.

I’m neither, so maybe I should ignore this, but this has already been dealt with. It was the subject of much of this thread. And it’s to the detriment of the discussion you started, I think, that you’re not listening and being somewhat antagonistic. I’d like you to respond to my post #67, also.

I don’t believe in god because all gods that have been defined by humans either have serious flaws in predictive power or are unfalsifiable.
Another thing that informs me is that I know how gullable humans are and I know there is a great DESIRE to believe (especially when they consider the finality of death). There is great power in belief itself, but I could never kid myself into making it work for me. Some studies have suggested that our brains are physiologically predisposed to believe in a god, something that may have originally developed as a survival mechanism.

Theists provide tortured explanations for this, but when pressed for evidence that would stand up with accepted historical evidence, retreat into faith.
[/QUOTE]

Very true. When pressed, they also set up straw man arguements and knock 'em down. Or they simply claim my arguementative or deductive techniques are somehow flawed or unscholarly and refuse to answer because of their made-up technicality.

I completely agree. But I believe our world will never improve unless deity-based religions are exposed and refuted for the evil they cause by a rational, truth-seeking public (paraphrased from my recent letter to crosswindsweekly.com)

Well, I post at the library, so I imagine I’ll be coming back as someone else as long as I want. Why bother if I annoy you so much?

That’ll get you banned pretty quick.

You seem very intelligent. The reason I don’t so easily dismiss (for example) Christianity is that I believe it continues to do a tremendous amount of harm to society, despite people feeling like they “need it.”

Sorry guy, but you’re way off base. Just because I am obviously attacking deity-based religions doesn’t mean I’m coming from a place of hatred. I think the religious fanatics in Al-Quada are coming from a place of hatred. Same for the Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland, not to mention historical America.

My ultimate goal is to discredit all deity-based religions in a very, big, public way that would force people to deal with their sh*t. I’ve thought about starting a group to raise money for a national billboard campaign that would expose some of the less-savoury passages from the Bible publicly. I bet you would HATE that, wouldn’t you? No, it’s not about sheer hatred. I sincerely believe the world would/ will be a much better place without the benifit of deity-based religions.

Say - did you know that the Bible has been widely used by slave-owners to justify having slaves? Why wouldn’t they? The Bible makes it plain that this practice should not be banned but is in fact acceptable. What’s worse, “God” condones slavery. I’m absolutely convinced that human empathy and reasoning would’ve done away with slavery long ago if it weren’t for the Bible!

Well said, apart from the bad spelling (pelase note how perfect my writing is!)

Didn’t mean to imply all POVs contrairey (sp?) to mine were insults. I just think some people don’t like it that I’m not particularly INTERNET-savey (sp?) or that I don’t go about things the way they think everyone should. I think some people try to discredit what I’m saying without actually confronting the issues I’m talking about. I welcome all POVs!

In a roundabout way, that’s very optimistic of you. More realistically, I’m sure you can find slavery in places that don’t have any of the Occidental religions.

Here’s the thing: you’ve got kind of a crusading attitude going on here, and that’s responsible for some of religion’s worst excesses and disasters.

Good point(s) but being “against God” and “against theism” are 2 different things!