Blair seems to be making the argument that Assad had secret WMD programs so it was reasonable to assume Saddam might have had them too.
But Blair is ignoring a crucial distinction: Iraq was the site of ongoing international inspections after 1991. And we now know that these inspections worked. Saddam was unable to develop any secret WMD programs. So comparing Saddam’s situation to Assad’s is wrong.
AK84, you seem to think anybody reading your link will unquestionably come to the same conclusion as you. If somebody questions you, they instantly become a Blair crony and are therefore your enemy.
You’ve been here 6 years. Haven’t you noticed by now that no Doper will swallow anything without wanting details first? What is it about Blair’s essay do you find disagreeable? I’m still not sure what got your panties in a wad.
I’ve never lived in the UK, so I don’t really know what makes Blair beloved or behated by the UKsters. I read the essay, and I think his main point was that Islamic extremists have to be contended with one way or another. I sure as hell don’t want the US et al back in Iraq, but we may have no choice if the extremists take power.
99% of the time, I just scan through posts without ever bothering to notice the usernames attached to each one. But I swear that at least a dozen times a week, I’ll run across a post so breathtakingly stupid that I need to scroll back up and see who managed to shit it out. Nearly every single time that happens, I see the name “Drunky Smurf”. It’s quite astonishing…almost as if it’s being done on purpose.
What the fuck are you guys on about? Malacandra didn’t make a good pitting at all. He extremely overreacted to something extremely small. Not even I overreact that much. A good pitting has anger that actually matches the offense. Someone telling you to go read a fucking link should not inspire that much anger in a mentally healthy person.
Yes, the OP should have explained himself better. But Malacandra wanted the OP to quote part of the essay so he wouldn’t have to read the whole thing. His post was a fucking TL;DR post. Anyone who posts any TL;DR post deserves to be mocked a bit. That shit doesn’t fly on Yahoo Answers.
Malacandra first just pointed out the laziness of the OP and suggested what could be done to correct it. Sure it’s a TL;DR post, but an appropriate one given that the OP has neither quoted anything nor even given any argument. I may as well start a thread “OMG the EU constitution is bullshit (link)”.
The rant only came after AK84 accused him/her of being a Blair supporter simply by virtue of criticizing the quality of the OP. That shit doesn’t fly.