Top Ten Scientific Proofs of Creation

[GEEPERS]

@miss_elizabeth

I cannot build a car from scratch, or even if you gave me all the parts in a pile, and yet I can see that the placement of the gas tank in the old Ford Pintos was a design flaw.

In fact, I’d be willing to bet you see design flaws in things you cannot build yourself all the time.

You (and many other religious people) seem to think that since scientists, which you falsely equate to atheists, do not have a god, they hold themselves up as god, and you seek to show us that we are not divine as god, since we can’t “build a man from dirt”. But, you see, we don’t believe in ANY gods. Scientists recognize they cannot make a person in a lab from scratch*. So what? The point is that God didn’t build a man from dirt EITHER. Not being able to make a person from dirt is utterly irrelevant, since no one (except the ignorant) thinks man was built from dirt anyway.

You are incapable of seeing the world without your religious lens. Rest assured that others don’t have that problem, though.

*yet. It may happen one day

Nope, you are saying you could build the human body better yet you don’t have a clue on how to build a human body. Wind pipe in the wrong spot? Ok, where are you going to put it? And how do you know a relocation wouldn’t intefer with some other bodily function?

Atheists differ from scientists because atheists present their position as concrete conclusive proof. No, a perceived design flaw does not concretely disprove God. And even if the human body did not have your noted flaws, you would find some other way to criticize. WHy are bones allowed to break? Why can’t a decapitated head reattach? Why didn’t God give us 4 arms instead of two? It would be endless complaints with the insane judgements that atheists hurl in defiance to a living God.