Just to clarify, is “the vile little post” refers to my request for clarification on who, exactly, are “we” that “get it”?
No, the vile little post was the one to which I posted the reply beginning “Yes, we get it”.
Yep, that’s the one, as he damn well knows.
And, once again, who are the “we” that you claim to represent?
Are you referring to me as “he”???
This is a deliberate insult.
Mods, please do take a note.
You say this person identifies herself as female, and yet the other females call her “Michael”. Is that the name she used? How long had she identifying herself as female before this incident?
Yes, that’s name she used.
I haven’t been keeping track of how long she had been identifying herself as female before this incident.
How do you know it was someone who identified herself as female, as opposed to an asshole male who forced his way into a girl’s bathroom to take pictures so that he be admired by those that admire assholes like that?
Because she identified herself as female, as opposed to an asshole male who forced his way into a girl’s bathroom to take pictures so that he be admired by those that admire assholes like that.
Was she still identifying herself as female when she was "engaging in a spirited 15-minute conversation with individuals, who identify themselves as males, while waving her cellphone around and demonstrating some newly-taken pictures, and getting approving comments, such as “wow, that’s a nice pic, Michael!”?
Yes, she was still identifying herself as female when she was "engaging in a spirited 15-minute conversation with individuals, who identify themselves as males, while waving her cellphone around and demonstrating some newly-taken pictures, and getting approving comments, such as “wow, that’s a nice pic, Michael!”.
NM. You’re not worth talking to.
I’m just telling you what she was identifying herself as.
Everyone who read your 10:20-timestamped post about “Michael” understood that it was about an alleged incident in which someone claiming to be a transgender girl took inappropriate pictures of girls in the girls’ restroom and showed them to boys.
That’s what I meant when I told you that “we get it”.
Note, by the way, that I do not “claim to represent” any opinions of anybody else in this thread (or elsewhere) concerning the actual substance of the debate. But given that your Michael-and-the-cellphone-photos anecdote wasn’t exactly subtle, I don’t think it was presumptuous of me to assure you that we all understood it.
The defeat acknowledgement is detected and acknowledged.
Can you please post a proof of the fact that “Everyone who read your 10:20-timestamped post about “Michael” understood…”, etc"?
Please make sure to include “everyone” in your post.
Thank you.
Sure.
Hey, brickbacon-here’s someone who claims he can back up your claim that fake transsexuals will take advantage of the system. Do you want him on your side?
Saying “sure” is not the same as posting a proof of the (alleged) fact that “Everyone who read your 10:20-timestamped post about “Michael” understood…”, etc.
Please post the proof or apologize for lying.
Thank you.
Just admit it. Nobody understood what his post meant, did they?